Viral tweet woman listing her dream bf attributes

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The girl is stunning looks like Margot Robbie. I’m sure she’ll find what she dreams of

This Twitter account is so obviously fake; why are people posting about it and falling for this nonsense here?

This is a troll Twitter account designed to get your attention, folks. Scroll down the actual Twitter feed for even a nanosecond. The "dream bf attributes" list is almost a copy of a "my dream startup investment" list that "Cooper" retweets in her own feed just below it. The writing in every post sounds like ChatGPT's version of a supposedly inspirational and aspirational young NYC go-getter.

You think that's her real photo? Look closely. It's surely something someone pulled from the internet to use. Might even BE a young Margot Robbie modeling underwear.

The Twitter account also links to "Cooper's" own store, which is a site selling exactly two very expensive baseball caps, and to an Instagram which is also obviously a bot or troll. The Insta only reposts two of "her" tweets (always a bad sign on Insta -- very few posts and/or no original ones at all) and links again to that online store with generic hats for $70.

Amazing that people here are taking this "viral tweet woman"'s list so seriously. One click on the tweet and a quick scroll, and it's obvious you're responding to a person who doesn't exist.

It’s just a fan account.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:By all means let's encourage behavior that will lead 3% of women to be very happy, and the remaining 97% or women to be lonely cat ladies who spend their time complaining about men.

Most women are happy single. Men however, are not.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The girl is stunning looks like Margot Robbie. I’m sure she’ll find what she dreams of

This Twitter account is so obviously fake; why are people posting about it and falling for this nonsense here?

This is a troll Twitter account designed to get your attention, folks. Scroll down the actual Twitter feed for even a nanosecond. The "dream bf attributes" list is almost a copy of a "my dream startup investment" list that "Cooper" retweets in her own feed just below it. The writing in every post sounds like ChatGPT's version of a supposedly inspirational and aspirational young NYC go-getter.

You think that's her real photo? Look closely. It's surely something someone pulled from the internet to use. Might even BE a young Margot Robbie modeling underwear.

The Twitter account also links to "Cooper's" own store, which is a site selling exactly two very expensive baseball caps, and to an Instagram which is also obviously a bot or troll. The Insta only reposts two of "her" tweets (always a bad sign on Insta -- very few posts and/or no original ones at all) and links again to that online store with generic hats for $70.

Amazing that people here are taking this "viral tweet woman"'s list so seriously. One click on the tweet and a quick scroll, and it's obvious you're responding to a person who doesn't exist.

It’s just a fan account.

So? Is that supposed to make it fine that people here are acting as if the post is for real and is someone's serious list?
And "fan account"? A fan account actuallly posts...fan musings about some celebrity. That's not what this one is. It's random "inspirational" crap clearly genereated by a bot or a troll. Unless of course you're mistaking this for "Only Fans" and think the chick in the photo is going to take her clothes off for you.

[Anonymous]

Remember how much trouble that guy got in for tweeting his list of requirements. It had things like "know how to cook" "don't be fat" "be feminine". They tried to cancel his life.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:By all means let's encourage behavior that will lead 3% of women to be very happy, and the remaining 97% or women to be lonely cat ladies who spend their time complaining about men.

Better lonely and complaining than in an unhappy relationship or marriage.

+1

Better to encourage the remaining 97% of men to step up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:By all means let's encourage behavior that will lead 3% of women to be very happy, and the remaining 97% or women to be lonely cat ladies who spend their time complaining about men.

Better lonely and complaining than in an unhappy relationship or marriage.

You think the lonely and complaining women are happy? Not just with their relationship, but overall?

Relationships are primarily for procreation and raising children. Companionship is a distant second. Make yourself happy. Find a hobby. Hang out with friends. And have a family.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:By all means let's encourage behavior that will lead 3% of women to be very happy, and the remaining 97% or women to be lonely cat ladies who spend their time complaining about men.

Better lonely and complaining than in an unhappy relationship or marriage.

You think the lonely and complaining women are happy? Not just with their relationship, but overall?

Relationships are primarily for procreation and raising children. Companionship is a distant second. Make yourself happy. Find a hobby. Hang out with friends. And have a family.

I don’t think single women are unhappy. Incels mostly tell themselves they are.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Remember how much trouble that guy got in for tweeting his list of requirements. It had things like "know how to cook" "don't be fat" "be feminine". They tried to cancel his life.

Good thing no woman is signing up for that. I’m not a personal chef.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Height and income first two priorities.

Pay attention, guys.

Ok men can take action to adjust the income, but how do you expect them to gaine a few inches in height? Only about 15% of the US population of men is 6ft or taller, so the other 85% will need to take drastic measures.

That's a misleading statistic because Asian and Hispanic men bring down the average.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What’s she bringing to the table? There are guys who fit all or most of that criteria, but they’re not just looking for a pretty face, they tend to want an equal.

Also worth noting for the 100th+ time that the men and women who fit this description tend to find their eventual spouses in college, grad school, or at an early job through their professional networks. Not as random online dating hookups. If she’s 27-33 also, the clock is definitely ticking.

No, they don’t. Looks are everything in women. For the 100th+ time.

Not really. Look at the old NYT wedding announcements. All those average looking Biglaw associates and guys working in finance were getting married to average looking rich women. Either high achievers themselves or from family money or both. They all went to like, the same private HS’s, same colleges, same grad schools, and got the same types of jobs. You never saw “the groom is an employee of Goldman Sachs and graduated from Phillips Exeter, Yale, and Wharton, and the bride graduated from local public school in Alabama and works at Starbucks.”

I do think weight matters though in the sense that upper income people are rarely obese in their 20s/30s.

Those are society people. People in that network look for the same. I went to HS with someone who was the scion of a prominent family and he dated an admiral's daughter. It's what happens in those circles.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Height and income first two priorities.

Pay attention, guys.

Ok men can take action to adjust the income, but how do you expect them to gaine a few inches in height? Only about 15% of the US population of men is 6ft or taller, so the other 85% will need to take drastic measures.

That's a misleading statistic because Asian and Hispanic men bring down the average.

Do they not count as being part of the US population of men?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Height and income first two priorities.

Pay attention, guys.

Ok men can take action to adjust the income, but how do you expect them to gaine a few inches in height? Only about 15% of the US population of men is 6ft or taller, so the other 85% will need to take drastic measures.

That's a misleading statistic because Asian and Hispanic men bring down the average.

Do they not count as being part of the US population of men?

white women with options don’t really consider them in their dating pool

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t see what the problem here is? Another person upset that women are allowed to have preferences? It’s 2023…surely that secret is out by now?

Bingo!. A women having a preference or standards bringing out all the haters

I don't think the haters are coming out over women having preferences. It's having preferences over something a man can't change.

Just change "don't be short" to "don't be black, hispanic, asian, jewish, etc., etc." for the true flavor of that preference.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t see what the problem here is? Another person upset that women are allowed to have preferences? It’s 2023…surely that secret is out by now?

Bingo!. A women having a preference or standards bringing out all the haters

I don't think the haters are coming out over women having preferences. It's having preferences over something a man can't change.

Just change "don't be short" to "don't be black, hispanic, asian, jewish, etc., etc." for the true flavor of that preference.

Why does it matter that they can’t change it? They shouldn’t date this woman! They should date women who find *them* attractive. It just reeks of entitlement to female attention.