You don’t find: “Please keep me in the loop about your next steps” problematic? I’m a different lawyer with fancy degrees and would not advise this. |
Hahahahahaha! Loser. |
Context makes clear that line is referring to usage of leave, etc. That's fine. |
|
Contact HR. I was the L&E attorney supporting HR and the first thing HR should do is loop lawyers in. They’ll advise you down to exactly how to respond and potentially the employee will never know lawyers or HR was involved.
Laypeople try to be nice, and that totally effs the company. The least of any of your problems are actually helping the employee. |
|
1) Call 988 for advice.
2) Discuss with your firm’s lawyer (to see if you now have a duty to take action). |
+1 Surprised at the reaction of another who claims to be a lawyer with fancy degrees. Just shows that fancy degrees do not mean that one has commonsense. |
Sorry, but I find it hard to believe that you are an attorney--with or without fancy degrees--if you cannot understand the difference between the two letters. |
Would like to hear how that works out for you in court. |
Please identify what federal statutes you believe are violated, please identify how each element is met, and please identify the damages you believe would be awarded. You all want to talk a big game, so out your damn money where your mouth is. |
I live in the real world and there is minimal litigation risk difference between the two letters. You think there's a difference, then identify the statutes you believe would give rise to liability and explain how every element is met. |
Uh, nobody is claiming one line in a letter amounts to a definitive statutory violation with damages. But, it’s a misstep and opens the employer up to liability. More so if there are other missteps or worse transgressions as the situation progresses. Employment attorneys are in the business of ensuring compliance, counseling their clients proactively, and saving a company from well-meaning employees who don’t fully understand the repercussions of their actions and statements. It’s all about minimizing liability for the business. |
I doubt that you are an attorney and I strongly suspect that you do not live in the world regarding litigation and threatened litigation with respect to employment matters. The more that you post, the clearer this becomes. |
This is a private health issue matter. None of my business. The employee should see a doctor if they want to. The employer isn’t their parent. |
This is bad advice unless your HR department is terrible. I work in HR and recently was made a aware of an employee with suicidal ideations. This employee lives outside of the US and I was able to work with our EAP provider to identify providers in the employee's country of residence and contract for their services. We have the ability to contact and influence providers. |
|
Do NOT contact HR.
I saw this play out once....HR got nervous that the employee dealing with suicidal ideation was a danger to themselves and the company....and immediately cut off their access to company email/assets and put them on leave. The employee wasn't involved in this decision. Imagine dealing with suicidal ideation and THEN ON TOP OF THAT having to deal with being cut out of work. I would make sure the employee knows about EAP and the suicide lifeline. |