The Tucker Carlson videos are dropping

[Anonymous]

Also, Sicknick's family is suing Trump for $10million. Of course, they don't want to see tape that does not support this suit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:bLuE lIvEs mAtTeR

This goes against the family's "story."
The video suggests their story is wrong.
The autopsy also says that their story is wrong.

It is human nature to want to blame someone else. I have compassion for the family, but,they have also been lied to. How many times have people on the Jan 6 committee said that Sicknick was killed that day?

The committee should have been honest about this. The White House should have been honest about this.

This makes me doubt EVERYTHING the committee did. Especially, since it was reported within days that Sicknick did not die that day.

Did the event contribute to his death? Maybe. Maybe not. But the story coming from the White House and the committee was unequivocal.

This is eerrily familiar...where have we seen this before, where Fox News sensationalizes a death, gets all of its viewers riled up into a conspiracy and then completely recant the story?


https://www.forbes.com/sites/jemimamcevoy/202...conspiracy-theories/


PizzaGate, mass voter fraud, vaccines, Obama's birth certificate, 9/11; gun confiscation, etc The record of truth from Fox News is rather thin, wouldn't you say?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Also, Sicknick's family is suing Trump for $10million. Of course, they don't want to see tape that does not support this suit.

There are, um, a lot of tapes. If there was a film of Lee Harvey Owsald easing an omelette in the morning before going to the book repository, would that be an exoneration? Because that is what Tucker, and by transitive property, you, are arguing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:bLuE lIvEs mAtTeR

This goes against the family's "story."
The video suggests their story is wrong.
The autopsy also says that their story is wrong.

It is human nature to want to blame someone else. I have compassion for the family, but,they have also been lied to. How many times have people on the Jan 6 committee said that Sicknick was killed that day?

The committee should have been honest about this. The White House should have been honest about this.

This makes me doubt EVERYTHING the committee did. Especially, since it was reported within days that Sicknick did not die that day.

Did the event contribute to his death? Maybe. Maybe not. But the story coming from the White House and the committee was unequivocal.

I hope karma finds people like you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Also, Sicknick's family is suing Trump for $10million. Of course, they don't want to see tape that does not support this suit.

There are, um, a lot of tapes. If there was a film of Lee Harvey Owsald easing an omelette in the morning before going to the book repository, would that be an exoneration? Because that is what Tucker, and by transitive property, you, are arguing.

Good. The tapes have been released. January 6 committee only showed part ot the story--and, I agree, that story is bad. But, they didn't have to lie. And, they did about Sicknick.

Certainly, there were many bad actors that day on January 6 who deserved to be punished. They could have told that story without the lies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Also, Sicknick's family is suing Trump for $10million. Of course, they don't want to see tape that does not support this suit.

There are, um, a lot of tapes. If there was a film of Lee Harvey Owsald easing an omelette in the morning before going to the book repository, would that be an exoneration? Because that is what Tucker, and by transitive property, you, are arguing.

Good. The tapes have been released. January 6 committee only showed part ot the story--and, I agree, that story is bad. But, they didn't have to lie. And, they did about Sicknick.

Certainly, there were many bad actors that day on January 6 who deserved to be punished. They could have told that story without the lies.

Poor Sicknick. His death is being minimized by partisans because... I'm not sure. Because Tucker Carlson said so, I guess.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Also, Sicknick's family is suing Trump for $10million. Of course, they don't want to see tape that does not support this suit.

There are, um, a lot of tapes. If there was a film of Lee Harvey Owsald easing an omelette in the morning before going to the book repository, would that be an exoneration? Because that is what Tucker, and by transitive property, you, are arguing.

Good. The tapes have been released. January 6 committee only showed part ot the story--and, I agree, that story is bad. But, they didn't have to lie. And, they did about Sicknick.

Certainly, there were many bad actors that day on January 6 who deserved to be punished. They could have told that story without the lies.

There are no lies. There was a violent insurrection, coordinated with civilian paramilitary to seize the US Capitol and push the certification back to the "controversial" states, where Trump would be declared the winner by fiat. It was all forecast in the Fall after the election but before 1/6. Everyone knew it was coming, but for a few US Capitol police and Dan Quayle advising Mike Pence, it would have been successful.

The tapes do nothing to undermine that story, no matter how much Tucker "I lie to my viewers" Carlson tries to convince you otherwise.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Democrats were hiding the truth for two years, while innocent American protesters can’t get their cancer treatment in the DC gulag. This is a human rights atrocity.

So he didn’t die later that day? You are a sick person.

[Anonymous]

The posts here show what the country is up against. The republicans/Jan 6th’ers will stop at nothing to destroy the country. Fox News is the propaganda arm of the insurrectionists party.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:bLuE lIvEs mAtTeR

This goes against the family's "story."
The video suggests their story is wrong.
The autopsy also says that their story is wrong.

It is human nature to want to blame someone else. I have compassion for the family, but,they have also been lied to. How many times have people on the Jan 6 committee said that Sicknick was killed that day?

The committee should have been honest about this. The White House should have been honest about this.

This makes me doubt EVERYTHING the committee did. Especially, since it was reported within days that Sicknick did not die that day.

Did the event contribute to his death? Maybe. Maybe not. But the story coming from the White House and the committee was unequivocal.

What makes you what? Did you quote the wrong post?

[Anonymous]

You know, Alex Jones just found out what happens when you f*ck around with victims’ families. Maybe Tucker will find out too. Fox needs to fire him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You know, Alex Jones just found out what happens when you f*ck around with victims’ families. Maybe Tucker will find out too. Fox needs to fire him.

This thread is making me think the same thing. There's a parallel of Fox denying someone's death. That didn't work out well for them then.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Also, Sicknick's family is suing Trump for $10million. Of course, they don't want to see tape that does not support this suit.

There are, um, a lot of tapes. If there was a film of Lee Harvey Owsald easing an omelette in the morning before going to the book repository, would that be an exoneration? Because that is what Tucker, and by transitive property, you, are arguing.

Good. The tapes have been released. January 6 committee only showed part ot the story--and, I agree, that story is bad. But, they didn't have to lie. And, they did about Sicknick.

Certainly, there were many bad actors that day on January 6 who deserved to be punished. They could have told that story without the lies.

Are you actually suggesting being attacked and beaten up can’t lead to a stroke? That manor stress is never linked to strokes? Are you a medical researcher with some new evidence of this assertion?

[Anonymous]

Why did Democrats so fiercely fight the release of these official evidence recordings?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is all about exposing the security apparatus in the US Capitol to our adversaries. Those of you getting upset about this need to remember, Kevin MCCarthy ONLY gave this footage to Tucker Carlson, not to all media outlets writ large.

And, Tucker Carlson, like other Fox "News" hosts, are entertainment and not news. They all admitted they KNEW the election was fair and they KNEW what they were doing in terms of suggesting the insurrection was legitimate.

And yet, here you are believing them and their on camera persona and not the texts disclosed in court where they were literally laughing at how stupid and gullible their viewers were (and apparently, are)

Exposing thd security apparatus?

No, that would be a foreign power sending a balloon with all sorts of equipment on it clear across the US and our missile silos and military bases before democrats decide to respond.