|
I really think that the issue is that MIL realized that if OP hosts the event, even her side of the family will come. In other words, when holidays are hosted by MIL, she calls her side of the family. Now, she will have to share the holiday with a bunch of people from OP's side of the family.
My compromise would be - OP should host Easter in her own house and call everyone she wants to call. Then you can have an Easter egg hunt at MIL's house, whenever you go to her house next. |
You're the one exaggerating, PP. I never said MIL was a terrible person. My own mother is like this. She is self-absorbed and immature. She's nice otherwise! It blows your mind, right, but people are complex and both good and bad. You've got to learn to manage them, and I've personally experienced that with some of these people, mirroring their actions just doesn't work, because they don't see themselves like that. They'd rather be in denial. |
Incorrect. They asked and MIL said yes and it would be “lovely.” She’s an adult, not a child. You don’t get to throw a tantrum later about what’s already been decided. |
In you mind, would there be a way to re-raise an issue when you are regretting/second-guessing your decision that would not qualify as "throwing a tantrum"? |
You're right, you didn't say MIL was a terrible person. You said she was an immature self-absorbed person who plays the victim and "baits and switches." You have somehow derived what "type of person" she is and assumed you know how she would react. All I know from OP's few sentences is that in this instance a person who has grown accustomed to hosting agreed not to host and then wanted to reraise the issue later. |
OP says they have a rotation with each family. And that when OP hosts her side of the family, they have not invited MIL. So what makes you think it would be different in this situation? |
NP. In a high-stakes or unbalanced situation? Sure. While I agree the word “tantrum” is too big here, there’s really no reasonable way for MIL to go back on her word when she’s hosted every other holiday and doesn’t have young kids or any good reason not to drive two hours and let someone else host for once. |
| I feel bad for the SIL who now has to decide whose house to go to for Easter. Shame on MIL for putting SIL in that position. |
|
We know where SIL is going.
Good for your DH!!! |
|
OP here. One update, one clarification:
1) SIL is now definitely coming to our house. Her feeling is that it was agreed upon, she accepted after MIL/FIL accepted, no reason not to. 2) For the poster who said my parents would be part of all holidays in the future…what? No. DH and I rotate holidays with our respective families. So one year might be Thanksgiving with ILs; Christmas with my family; Easter with ILs; Fourth of July with my family, etc. In a rotation. There is no overlap, because it doesn’t make logistical sense, AND my sister and brother also have “turns” with my parents, etc. So that just…isn’t a thing. |
Bingo. |
Wow so both your husband and SIL are making all the right calls here. This is great, OP! |
| Enjoy it this year because I don't see your mother-in-law giving up a single holiday....weekend... or any other traditional day that she has gotten in the past. Oofta. |
Welp, she can stay home alone if DH and his sister both decide they like the change of pace! Oofta…yeah, sure, yabetcha! |
My mother-in-law did this. Agreed to come to our house for Thanksgiving about 6 years ago. Complained about it the entire time and refused to even talk about anyone else hosting it. We just stopped showing up every year and started going to my family's every other year. |