King Charles evicts Harry and Meghan from Frogmore

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Not sure how he can publish a tell-all, disparage his family, profit off this betrayal and expect the royal treatment when he returns for a visit. Is he that entitled to expect the taxpayers to continue to pay for him? These are the consequences of his actions.

But apparently no consequences for Andrew and Fergie! Hmmm.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Agreed with OP. and prince andrew is moving in? It’s laughable how much more willing Charles is to take care of a serious sex offender than his own son and grandchildren, all because one person is more willing to keep his mouth shut and kiss Charles’s a**. Honestly, gross Charles. Clearly a terrible father with serious narcissistic issues.

+1

This is crazy! Charles said he won't leave his brother homeless and penniless.... but he has no trouble doing that to his son.

There were rumors that Charles is not the biological father of Harry. I wonder if Charles knows that these rumors are true.

Harry is prince charles' on. Look at those ears!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It’s so petty. Charles is kicking out his own son—essentially ensuring Harry will never come back to the UK—but letting Andrew and Fergie live there?? Andrew, friend of Epstein and accused sexual offender, and Fergie who has had her own share of scandal in the past.

It’s almost like everything Harry has said about his dysfunctional is true…

Do you know where Andrew was living before?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not sure how he can publish a tell-all, disparage his family, profit off this betrayal and expect the royal treatment when he returns for a visit. Is he that entitled to expect the taxpayers to continue to pay for him? These are the consequences of his actions.

But apparently no consequences for Andrew and Fergie! Hmmm.

That's a silly take.

[Anonymous]

Lol why are people responding to this like he’s a 16 year old kid getting kicked out of mom and dad’s house. He’s an almost 40 year old man who lives in California and has made it clear he doesn’t want to be a part of the royal family anymore. This is not that hard to understand.

[Anonymous]

I follow Elizabeth Holmes- So Many Thoughts- on Instagram. She’s mostly about how royal fashion is interpreted but also researched a lot of things regarding the royal family. One thing she found was that this is a bit of a domino effect. William and Kate are currently in a 4 bedroom residence and want to upgrade. Charles wants to give them Andrews current home, which is much larger. In order to do that, Andrew needs to go elsewhere, and Frogmore is much cheaper to maintain for him than his current home. For charles it’s a win, win, win (will and Kate get a better home, Andrew costs less, he gets to kick out Harry/Megan), except for the negative PR.

[Anonymous]

Sure I believe Andrew should be living in goverbment provided housing but, you know, the kind you should be living in when you raped underage girls.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s so petty. Charles is kicking out his own son—essentially ensuring Harry will never come back to the UK—but letting Andrew and Fergie live there?? Andrew, friend of Epstein and accused sexual offender, and Fergie who has had her own share of scandal in the past.

It’s almost like everything Harry has said about his dysfunctional is true…

Do you know where Andrew was living before?

Yes there aren’t any other residences they could’ve gone to instead of Frogmore? Charles could’ve moved them elsewhere.

[Anonymous]

No wonder Charles can’t find anyone to perform at his coronation. H&M are liked in the US and Charles isn’t gaining anyone’s sympathy by doing this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Agreed with OP. and prince andrew is moving in? It’s laughable how much more willing Charles is to take care of a serious sex offender than his own son and grandchildren, all because one person is more willing to keep his mouth shut and kiss Charles’s a**. Honestly, gross Charles. Clearly a terrible father with serious narcissistic issues.

+1

This is crazy! Charles said he won't leave his brother homeless and penniless.... but he has no trouble doing that to his son.

There were rumors that Charles is not the biological father of Harry. I wonder if Charles knows that these rumors are true.

Harry is a dead ringer for a friend of Diana's, James Hewitt. He's also a dead ringer for his grandfather, Prince Phillip. Go figure.

Harry is a dead ringer for his maternal aunt Jane, also a ginger. No clue about his paternity but he is all Spencer in appearance.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Confused -- did H&M pay for the upgrades or did the taxpayers pay for it? The article you link to indicates that the renovation was taxpayer funded but your post indicates they paid out of pocket.

It does seem vindictive but on the other hand it's not like they are homeless. They will likely argue that this makes it too hard for them to travel to the UK because staying in a hotel or another house might not have the security benefits of Frogmore. I get why they would worry about that but I also think that's probably a solvable problem.

Sometimes I find this family drama engaging because aspects of it are relatable -- the emotionally distant parent, the family dynamics that pit siblings against each other, a bunch of dysfunctional communication styles and the one family member who is finally getting therapy and realizing his family has been super screwed up all along.

Other times I'm like whatever you are all rich and most of you didn't earn any of your money yourselves, surely you can find a way to sort this out without involving the rest of us. Megan's the only one whose ever had an honest job, the rest base their very privilege existences on the idiotic premise that a long time ago, God ordained their family as the rules of England. I mean, it's comically dumb. And all their problems flow from that ridiculous fiction they have all chosen to believe in. It's like the world's stupidest religious cult.

Taxpayers initially paid for the upgrades but Charles reimbursed the monies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:No wonder Charles can’t find anyone to perform at his coronation. H&M are liked in the US and Charles isn’t gaining anyone’s sympathy by doing this.

Is this really true? I think the jury is very much out on that; I hear so many mixed opinions, I'm not sure you're correct.

[Anonymous]

My husband has this kind of dysfunctional family. (Not the royal part but the rest of it). There are families that TRULY favor one child more than the other and TRULY are this mean, spiteful and vindictive. If you don’t believe Charles is doing this just to be a dick, well, you haven’t lived through it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Agreed with OP. and prince andrew is moving in? It’s laughable how much more willing Charles is to take care of a serious sex offender than his own son and grandchildren, all because one person is more willing to keep his mouth shut and kiss Charles’s a**. Honestly, gross Charles. Clearly a terrible father with serious narcissistic issues.

+1

This is crazy! Charles said he won't leave his brother homeless and penniless.... but he has no trouble doing that to his son.

There were rumors that Charles is not the biological father of Harry. I wonder if Charles knows that these rumors are true.

Harry is a dead ringer for a friend of Diana's, James Hewitt. He's also a dead ringer for his grandfather, Prince Phillip. Go figure.

Harry is a dead ringer for his maternal aunt Jane, also a ginger. No clue about his paternity but he is all Spencer in appearance.

Poor Aunt Jane, whoever she is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I follow Elizabeth Holmes- So Many Thoughts- on Instagram. She’s mostly about how royal fashion is interpreted but also researched a lot of things regarding the royal family. One thing she found was that this is a bit of a domino effect. William and Kate are currently in a 4 bedroom residence and want to upgrade. Charles wants to give them Andrews current home, which is much larger. In order to do that, Andrew needs to go elsewhere, and Frogmore is much cheaper to maintain for him than his current home. For charles it’s a win, win, win (will and Kate get a better home, Andrew costs less, he gets to kick out Harry/Megan), except for the negative PR.

This actually makes sense. H&M don't need Frogmore, a waste to let a fully renovated residence sit there.