Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Can someone explain to me the issues the schools have that make a school untenable by 2nd grade when it was great in ECE? Is it simply that the UMC kids leave by then or is there something else going on?
I don't know if this is true for all schools but I can share our experience. We started in PS3 at a HRCS. It was wonderful. Diverse classroom (race, socio-economic, language) and they used kindness and soft voices to communicate needs and wants to kids. That was great for several years. Then 1st or 2nd grade happened and the kindness and squishy stuff had to give way to actual learning. Our school was ill quipped. The ED hid behind "equity" as a shield and anyone who questioned the low expectations or increasing behavioral issues was softly labeled a racist. As kids got older and hormones kicked in, the ECE approach did not work, but they were so committed to "equity" and their "approach" that, absent a violent act in school, kids were left in classrooms to distract and create havoc. Admins were nowhere to be found and teachers either lacked the tools or support from the top to abate the descent. Kids figured out there were no consequences so most days pickup was stories about all of the kids who acted out or the classes that didn't teach the subject because the teachers had lost all control. Starting in 2nd or 3rd grade the black families started to leave. These were the kids at the top of the class whose parents were NOT ok with poor behavior and disrespecting school being equated with "equity". We lost POC to GDS, Sidwell and other parochial and private schools. As those kids left the backfilled kids were not steeped in the culture of the school so even that cultural backstop failed (kindness, civility, community). More often than not the kids who came in were behind, so we traded high performing kids for low performing kids. A cohort that was evenly distributed with a material group of top performers became a few (2, maybe 3) working ahead of grade level and teachers triaging behavioral issues and kids a grade or two behind. Kids at the top were put in the corner in front of educational computer programs and/or became assistant teachers. As this happened in 3rd, more kids left by 4th. The cycle accelerated. Behavioral issues got worse (hormones' kicked in harder, kids got bigger and those who got frustrated by unsuccessful academic progress acted out more regularly and were treated like 6 year old's with zero consequences). We had a kid in a class attack another kid during class and all they did was remove the attacker for a moment and then have him come back and apologize to the victim in public moments later. The school did not tell us our kids witnessed an assault in class. When the issue was raised they hid behind privacy laws. No one asked for the assailant's name, but our kids witnessed violence in the classroom and the school was concerned almost exclusively with making sure the attacker was made to feel better. Nary a thought for the kids whose concept of safe spaces was shattered. Of course the attacker was back in class that same day. I could recount similar stories from that and other grades. By 5th grade the Latin and BASIS attrition decimated what was left of the high performing cohort. At our school, anyone who suggested unchecked behavioral issues were an increasing problem was labeled a racist.
We finally escaped before MS started. The middle school that our ES fed into started this January on a staggered start with 6th, 7th and 8th graders coming back separately to try and reset the significant behavioral issues. Too little, too late.