Man killed in Tyson’s Corner shooting

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ok so just theft? They absolutely had to hunt him down and kill him?

At this point, good. Tysons has been plagued with shootings, thefts, fights, etc. for the past 2 years. I hope this incident will deter the criminals who are now coming in droves to commit acts of violence at the mall. I go there with my family. I will not mourn the loss of another criminal who tried to rob the mall and put innocent lives in danger. He made his choice. And it turned out to be a very bad one.

I get that you're concerned about safety. But do you understand that shoplifting shouldn't result in an execution?

Maybe he should have stayed to be arrested? A year ago, I would've agreed with you. But I no longer care much about the lives of the career criminals at Tysons. And I care even less about criminal gun owners who put the lives of our community at risk. We were at the mall not too long ago when cops came to arrest an armed suspect at Macy's. I'm done with gun violence. LEt's be rid of the perpetrators. Oh well.

I hope the irony doesn't escape you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ok so just theft? They absolutely had to hunt him down and kill him?

At this point, good. Tysons has been plagued with shootings, thefts, fights, etc. for the past 2 years. I hope this incident will deter the criminals who are now coming in droves to commit acts of violence at the mall. I go there with my family. I will not mourn the loss of another criminal who tried to rob the mall and put innocent lives in danger. He made his choice. And it turned out to be a very bad one.

It won't deter anything. It will create more division and hate. Didn't you follow the news the last few years?

Create division and hate between who? Criminals and the police?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ok so just theft? They absolutely had to hunt him down and kill him?

At this point, good. Tysons has been plagued with shootings, thefts, fights, etc. for the past 2 years. I hope this incident will deter the criminals who are now coming in droves to commit acts of violence at the mall. I go there with my family. I will not mourn the loss of another criminal who tried to rob the mall and put innocent lives in danger. He made his choice. And it turned out to be a very bad one.

No. This is America and we have laws. We don’t murder people for theft.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ok so just theft? They absolutely had to hunt him down and kill him?

At this point, good. Tysons has been plagued with shootings, thefts, fights, etc. for the past 2 years. I hope this incident will deter the criminals who are now coming in droves to commit acts of violence at the mall. I go there with my family. I will not mourn the loss of another criminal who tried to rob the mall and put innocent lives in danger. He made his choice. And it turned out to be a very bad one.

It won't deter anything. It will create more division and hate. Didn't you follow the news the last few years?

Create division and hate between who? Criminals and the police?

Ok go back under your rock or whatever deep sleep you were in.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ok so just theft? They absolutely had to hunt him down and kill him?

At this point, good. Tysons has been plagued with shootings, thefts, fights, etc. for the past 2 years. I hope this incident will deter the criminals who are now coming in droves to commit acts of violence at the mall. I go there with my family. I will not mourn the loss of another criminal who tried to rob the mall and put innocent lives in danger. He made his choice. And it turned out to be a very bad one.

No. This is America and we have laws. We don’t murder people for theft.

Ah, that's right. The law.
Shame we don't have laws against theft, larceny, aggravated assault, resisting arrest, obstructing justice, dangerous use of firearm, public endangerment, and similar. Because those would be really good ones to have.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ok so just theft? They absolutely had to hunt him down and kill him?

At this point, good. Tysons has been plagued with shootings, thefts, fights, etc. for the past 2 years. I hope this incident will deter the criminals who are now coming in droves to commit acts of violence at the mall. I go there with my family. I will not mourn the loss of another criminal who tried to rob the mall and put innocent lives in danger. He made his choice. And it turned out to be a very bad one.

No. This is America and we have laws. We don’t murder people for theft.

Actually, it's legal to use deadly force to protect property in Texas. Derives from horse thieving days, when one could be hanged for stealing horses. Not that it stopped all horse thieves, just sayin' that it's not unacceptable in all of America to use deadly force to stop a thief.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trees, loser PP, those are trees. Not woods.

Jungle.

[Anonymous]

Bungle in the jungle.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ok so just theft? They absolutely had to hunt him down and kill him?

At this point, good. Tysons has been plagued with shootings, thefts, fights, etc. for the past 2 years. I hope this incident will deter the criminals who are now coming in droves to commit acts of violence at the mall. I go there with my family. I will not mourn the loss of another criminal who tried to rob the mall and put innocent lives in danger. He made his choice. And it turned out to be a very bad one.

How, exactly, does “trying to rob the mall…put innocent lives in danger”? There’s no report that the suspect had a weapon or tried to hurt anyone. Do you have more information than what’s been reported here?

Are you suggesting that shoplifters — even the ones who frequent Claire’s — should be gunned down by cops because they “put innocent lives in danger”? Or is there something about this particular situation that stands out to you as warranting being shot to death?

[Anonymous]

Thanks to who poster the picture and identified the woods. Those ARE woods. The news articles CALL it woods.

WHY do you all have to pick a stupid fight about ever.little.thing? You all are unbearable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Thanks to who poster the picture and identified the woods. Those ARE woods. The news articles CALL it woods.

WHY do you all have to pick a stupid fight about ever.little.thing? You all are unbearable.

OT, but I am almost 50 and grew up in this area. They definitely USED to be woods and thus I can see that people would still call them that.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ok so just theft? They absolutely had to hunt him down and kill him?

Body cam footage will tell the story. They have not said whether or not the person was armed or pulled a gun first.

Well it was notably absent in all the early reports. Besides, they need time to plant that evidence.

It’s protocol to do an investigation (e.g. review bodycam tape, interview officers who discharged the weapon) before releasing that info to the public. In this case both a uniformed and plain clothed officer were involved and per the briefing both discharged the weapon. That would indicate that both felt there was an immediate reason to discharge their weapon.

Two wrongs don’t make it right. And the police always lead with how they were placed in danger before they fired. Not so here.

Sorry, incorrect. They cannot fully search the scene for evidence due to lack of daylight so they are resuming the search of the area tomorrow. They would not lead with info they do not have.

Don’t be sorry.
Police always say they (or another person) were in danger before they fire. Always. Classic CYA.

FFX Police Chief did not say that tonight. He said they needed to complete the investigation before commenting on that. Which is the right thing to do.

Because they weren’t in danger. They need to work on their statement.

The police are generally over eager to release favorable information to the media after such incidents. Eg, if the suspect had a weapon the police definitely would have made that information public immediately.

However, it is very possible that FCPD are releasing all of the information they have because the officers are taking their 72 hour time to talk with their FOP attorney before making a statement to policr investigators and that might be why more information has not yet been released.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ok so just theft? They absolutely had to hunt him down and kill him?

At this point, good. Tysons has been plagued with shootings, thefts, fights, etc. for the past 2 years. I hope this incident will deter the criminals who are now coming in droves to commit acts of violence at the mall. I go there with my family. I will not mourn the loss of another criminal who tried to rob the mall and put innocent lives in danger. He made his choice. And it turned out to be a very bad one.

I get that you're concerned about safety. But do you understand that shoplifting shouldn't result in an execution?

Being shot while resisting arrest is not “an execution.” Committing crimes and fleeing from the police is an inherently risky thing to do, as in the chaos of such events it’s quite foreseeable that the police can believe themselves threatened and need to take action. Obviously what the bodycam footage shows is important here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ok so just theft? They absolutely had to hunt him down and kill him?

At this point, good. Tysons has been plagued with shootings, thefts, fights, etc. for the past 2 years. I hope this incident will deter the criminals who are now coming in droves to commit acts of violence at the mall. I go there with my family. I will not mourn the loss of another criminal who tried to rob the mall and put innocent lives in danger. He made his choice. And it turned out to be a very bad one.

No. This is America and we have laws. We don’t murder people for theft.

Ah, that's right. The law.
Shame we don't have laws against theft, larceny, aggravated assault, resisting arrest, obstructing justice, dangerous use of firearm, public endangerment, and similar. Because those would be really good ones to have.

Exactly.
Shits getting out of hand. This is the risk you take when you act like an a$$.