Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Tenleytown and Wesley heights kids needed a bus and the d6 don't
Pick around this area .dcps is making very hard to get to the school. The city need to do something about this problem like deal did
This. To get to the new high school from just over a mile away, the kids would have to take three buses (mass ave, wisconsin ave, and then back out macarthur). It's a major deterrent for these neighborhood families.
If they are just over a mile away, they can walk.
Biking would be nice too, but bike infrastructure sucks over there.
Few students will live within a mile. We're in Wesley Heights, and Apple Maps puts the walk at 2 mi and 45 min (in the downhill direction). All of the Eaton boundary is significantly farther (3-5 miles).
That’s far. How do they get to Deal and JR now?
They don't go to deal.... they go to Hardy.
Correct. But to get to J-R and (in the old days) Deal, they walk, bike, ride the bus, or get dropped off. Because J-R and Deal are much closer to them and are centrally located at the center of several major roads.
Macarthur is convenient to almost no one. You would never pick it for it's location, unless you were aiming to be accessible to VA and MD commuters.
For almost all of the MacArthur catchment, MacArthur is closer than JR.
Your data? For students living inbounds for Eaton and most of Mann, it is not closer. And for a bunch of other students, Macarthur may be closer as the crow flies, but not easier to get to.
My data is looking at a map.
So your data is not very useful. Few DCPS kids live in Georgetown, Foxhall, or Palisades. The bulk of the kids zoned for Macarthur have to get from the Wisconsin Ave corridor (on which their homes and Deal/J-R lie) over to Macarthur Blvd. It is not easy by bus, it is not easy walking or biking (distance and hills), it is not quick driving (small roads + traffic).
But don't let knowledge get in the way of your making assertions.
Let's review. I said, "For almost all of the MacArthur catchment, MacArthur is closer than JR." By "catchment" I meant the land area; a quick look at a map tells you that most of the area is closer to MacArthur.
Let me turn the question around: what's your data? Because I've actually studied the issue, and I know that DCPS has studiously avoided releasing any information about the geographic composition of the current Hardy student body. Sure, you can look at the in-boundary rate for Hardy, and you can look at the in-boundary rate for the feeder schools, and maybe make some inferences, but DCPS won't share a few key facts that you'd need to make any sort of meaningful analysis. Like, for example, what percentage of in-boundary kids at each feeder school go on to Hardy.
So what's your data?