Elise Stefanik

[Anonymous]

So he nominated her as a favor. What is she going to do?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She will be fine in this job even if she is a disappointing Trump sycophant.

I do love that MAGA people are defending some of these silly nominees by citing their Ivy League degrees. Is elite good or bad?

It’s good when THEY have Ivy League degrees and live in coastal cities; it’s bad when Dems do. The irony is that Trump himself is very impressed by ivy league degrees and likes to
cite his own educational credentials from Wharton.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She will be fine in this job even if she is a disappointing Trump sycophant.

I do love that MAGA people are defending some of these silly nominees by citing their Ivy League degrees. Is elite good or bad?

It’s good when THEY have Ivy League degrees and live in coastal cities; it’s bad when Dems do. The irony is that Trump himself is very impressed by ivy league degrees and likes to
cite his own educational credentials from Wharton.

You forgot an adjective: "own FAKE educational credentials..." Source: Mary T.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

They are scared of losing a Trump +21 seat. go figure.

[Anonymous]

Because the two Florida special elections next Tuesday, in very red areas, are polling within the margin of error, and after the Pennsylvania loss, the administration is thinking of pulling Stefani's nomination. She gave up her leadership position for this. And now, because MAGA and Musk are so tremendously unpopular, she's going to end up with no position at all.

But the administration isn't thinking of changing anything about themselves, to reduce their massive unpopularity. They think they have two years to remake the federal government and the entire country. If they lose the special elections, they might not have that long.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Because the two Florida special elections next Tuesday, in very red areas, are polling within the margin of error, and after the Pennsylvania loss, the administration is thinking of pulling Stefani's nomination. She gave up her leadership position for this. And now, because MAGA and Musk are so tremendously unpopular, she's going to end up with no position at all.

But the administration isn't thinking of changing anything about themselves, to reduce their massive unpopularity. They think they have two years to remake the federal government and the entire country. If they lose the special elections, they might not have that long.

I love this for her. When you lie down with dogs, you rise up with fleas.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because the two Florida special elections next Tuesday, in very red areas, are polling within the margin of error, and after the Pennsylvania loss, the administration is thinking of pulling Stefani's nomination. She gave up her leadership position for this. And now, because MAGA and Musk are so tremendously unpopular, she's going to end up with no position at all.

But the administration isn't thinking of changing anything about themselves, to reduce their massive unpopularity. They think they have two years to remake the federal government and the entire country. If they lose the special elections, they might not have that long.

I love this for her. When you lie down with dogs, you rise up with fleas.

Please. Stefanik did not and will not "rise up". She will slither away with fleas like the comic, spineless gremlin she is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Because the two Florida special elections next Tuesday, in very red areas, are polling within the margin of error, and after the Pennsylvania loss, the administration is thinking of pulling Stefani's nomination. She gave up her leadership position for this. And now, because MAGA and Musk are so tremendously unpopular, she's going to end up with no position at all.

But the administration isn't thinking of changing anything about themselves, to reduce their massive unpopularity. They think they have two years to remake the federal government and the entire country. If they lose the special elections, they might not have that long.

Good she deserves to lose

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Hahahahahahaha

[Anonymous]

Prediction: She’s next in line for a bigger job as soon as Waltz or Rubio get fired.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Hahahahahahaha

Then Trump's nominee's from Congress will be 0 for 3.

If Waltz fired because of Signal gate, I assume he does not go back to congress? SMH

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Prediction: She’s next in line for a bigger job as soon as Waltz or Rubio get fired.

Of course she wants that - but would she get it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She's a climber; unimpressive, brainwashed and big mouthed. She will be a global laughingstock.

Sad that a qualified ambitious woman is called a climber. I remember it was not too long ago that she was mocked that she didn’t have kids yet and Harvard (she is a Harvard Law grad) threw her off some committee. She didn’t fall apart. I like her.

Get your facts straight. She is not a lawyer. She went to undergrad at Harvard, not law school.