Republicans use gross language — Will it stop?

[Anonymous]

I kinda feel like there are TONS of legitimate things to complaint about republicans, and specifically Cawthorne.

Going after language because your kids hurt it, and targeting it at "republicans" seems a little too one-sided. Be mad at the man if you want, but vulgar language is not a partisan issue.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Hey OP.
Just be glad you didn’t have children when Bill Clinton was president.
Sheesh!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just have to wonder what you let your children watch.

And, clearly, you must not let your children listen to rap music or hip hop or watch the grammys or oscars because Lord knows....... there is far worse to be seen and heard on these.

The news.

Did you even read the OP?

No, they didn’t. They have to get their racism on the record here. It is telling how far the GOP has slid that they’re just coarse and vulgar all the time now.

+1

Curse words aren’t ideal yet don’t mind them. It’s the more descriptive sex acts, bodily functions related to sex, and/or sexual assault acts: “blood coming from her whatever,” “grab them by the p—-y,” “moved on her like a b—h but she was married,” “orgies.”

Or even Trump saying he would date Ivanka. Yuck.

And the conspiracy theory about prostitution in Comet Ping Ping. Some of this is about demonizing DC people.

The ones who speak loudest are telling us what they are. I find Republicans are more likely to loudly complain about that which they themselves are doing. Prostitution rings, etc.

I’m not saying a Democrat means you don’t engage in these things. I’m not seeing them talking about it so much.

Part of it, I bet, is about disparaging and demonizing people to deflect their own bad actions.

What a damned hypocrite you are. "Curse words aren't ideal yet I don't mind them."
Guess you didn't mind when Joe said, "This is a big f***ing deal."
How do you explain the meaning of the word Joe used??????

Why are you so angry?

A curse word is different than the description of an act. If you don’t know the difference, too bad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I kinda feel like there are TONS of legitimate things to complaint about republicans, and specifically Cawthorne.

Going after language because your kids hurt it, and targeting it at "republicans" seems a little too one-sided. Be mad at the man if you want, but vulgar language is not a partisan issue.

Which elected Ds use vulgar language?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hey OP.
Just be glad you didn’t have children when Bill Clinton was president.
Sheesh!

He didn’t run around accusing others. Unlike you, I’m not partisan on the topic of men who are so insecure as to push themselves into and onto younger women who work for them. That’s more of a “men problem.”

Clinton DID gross things but I am not talking about what Trump or Cawthorn DID. I’m talking about how they DESCRIBE it.

Clinton describing anything under oath doesn’t count because he was forced to do that. Otherwise, he didn’t go around to the press talking about orgies.

Trump freely brings up gross descriptions to the press. It’s Republicans who talk to the press about their (projected) sex lives—way more than Democrats.

Trump even got it out into the press that Marla said he was the best sex she ever had. Trump planted the quote to make himself look good.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Ironic that you are also dreadfully upset that kindergartners in Florida can’t be taught about homosexuality and trans-sexuality

Meanwhile you don’t want to wear a mask because “freedom,” but you don’t mind someone taking the freedom to say “gay.”

Funny that.

Yay
For
Gays

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Clutching pearls, aren't we?

The Democrats hold no higher moral road when it comes to gross language. Remember all the f*** Trump signs and utterance in national TV including at the Academy Awards?

And let’s not forget all those delightful p*ssy hats!

What's wrong with pussy hats?

You have an issue with vulvas and vaginas?

Do you find them intimidating? threatening?

You mean “coitus” ?

No. The hats didn’t mean “coitus”. Do you know what that means?

What’s wrong with vulvas and vaginas?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Clutching pearls, aren't we?

The Democrats hold no higher moral road when it comes to gross language. Remember all the f*** Trump signs and utterance in national TV including at the Academy Awards?

Do you watch the Academy Awards? Lol

Do you watch movies? Most are probably made by people you don’t agree with politically. Who has the talent? All you got is Fox News. 🤣🤣

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I kinda feel like there are TONS of legitimate things to complaint about republicans, and specifically Cawthorne.

Going after language because your kids hurt it, and targeting it at "republicans" seems a little too one-sided. Be mad at the man if you want, but vulgar language is not a partisan issue.

Language is everything.

It can start wars. It can create truces.

Okay, I’ll be mad at the man. Good advice. All the men who are describing sex acts are Republicans, though. Maybe they are partisan because someone must be telling them at their ALEC meeting to say these things.

They do gather together to align on their talking points.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ironic that you are also dreadfully upset that kindergartners in Florida can’t be taught about homosexuality and trans-sexuality

Meanwhile you don’t want to wear a mask because “freedom,” but you don’t mind someone taking the freedom to say “gay.”

Funny that.

Yay
For
Gays

Say "gay" all you want. Just don't teach our K-3 kids about what it means to be gay or trans.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Clutching pearls, aren't we?

The Democrats hold no higher moral road when it comes to gross language. Remember all the f*** Trump signs and utterance in national TV including at the Academy Awards?

Do you watch the Academy Awards? Lol

Do you watch movies? Most are probably made by people you don’t agree with politically. Who has the talent? All you got is Fox News. 🤣🤣

Good point about the Academy Awards and movies. Music videos too.
If OP is upset about what a couple politicians say, she must be needing a fainting couch for what Hollywood and the music industry says and shows.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ironic that you are also dreadfully upset that kindergartners in Florida can’t be taught about homosexuality and trans-sexuality

Meanwhile you don’t want to wear a mask because “freedom,” but you don’t mind someone taking the freedom to say “gay.”

Funny that.

Yay
For
Gays

Say "gay" all you want. Just don't teach our K-3 kids about what it means to be gay or trans.

Why not?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I kinda feel like there are TONS of legitimate things to complaint about republicans, and specifically Cawthorne.

Going after language because your kids hurt it, and targeting it at "republicans" seems a little too one-sided. Be mad at the man if you want, but vulgar language is not a partisan issue.

Which elected Ds use vulgar language?

Can You define “vulgar language”? Or is it just the words “cocaine” and “orgy”?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I kinda feel like there are TONS of legitimate things to complaint about republicans, and specifically Cawthorne.

Going after language because your kids hurt it, and targeting it at "republicans" seems a little too one-sided. Be mad at the man if you want, but vulgar language is not a partisan issue.

Which elected Ds use vulgar language?

Can You define “vulgar language”? Or is it just the words “cocaine” and “orgy”?

Ask PP who said: “Be mad at the man if you want, but vulgar language is not a partisan issue.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hey OP.
Just be glad you didn’t have children when Bill Clinton was president.
Sheesh!

He didn’t run around accusing others. Unlike you, I’m not partisan on the topic of men who are so insecure as to push themselves into and onto younger women who work for them. That’s more of a “men problem.”

Clinton DID gross things but I am not talking about what Trump or Cawthorn DID. I’m talking about how they DESCRIBE it.

Clinton describing anything under oath doesn’t count because he was forced to do that. Otherwise, he didn’t go around to the press talking about orgies.

Trump freely brings up gross descriptions to the press. It’s Republicans who talk to the press about their (projected) sex lives—way more than Democrats.

Trump even got it out into the press that Marla said he was the best sex she ever had. Trump planted the quote to make himself look good.

This is pretty hysterical considering he had to talk about what he had done.
Nothing like explaining oral sex, BJs and what a man does with a cigar and a woman to kids.