+1 |
Absolutely wrong. Saw Naviance for past several years. This year’s outcomes are not even close. Things are different. |
This +100. Wish we had applied to rollings early. Wish we had applied to more safeties. |
What makes a person take the time to post this? |
And state the GPA. |
I am sorry if I was not clear enough in my description. The numbers referred to the number of students and the 100 is the total number of kids in the advanced academic program (starts out with 125 and usually ends in senior yr with around 100), not the entire HS. In our district, competitive special programs are housed in regular HS. UVA has reliably received 15 students from this public school program (sure it was a few more who were accepted but did not commit, but could not tell you for sure or how many). The top 5% of this public school have ended up in the past 3 years at the following Top10: Harvard, Princeton, MIT, Stanford, UPenn, Johns Hopkins, Columbia. Next 5% of the graduating class have ended at: Brown, Cornell, Rice, WUSTL, Duke. |
I suspect your location matters a great deal, so what you have to say may be perfectly valid for your kid's school, but it may not apply to students from the DC area. |
I know but still saying it makes people feel better. I have been hearing the same thing for more than 10 years. It's same every time. You just smile, nod and move on. |
Maggie Walker? |
Until pp lists the GPA, I don't think you can assess anything. Plus, NMS meant little this year, You could get it using your SAT score if you got your form in by a certain date. |
Nope, but DC had an EC friend who went there and got accepted ED into Princeton Another from Flint Hill got into Harvard.
My point was just that I cannot discern, at least for DC program, any real shift in acceptance for the year before covid, during covid and last year. Numbers-wise I see still as many get into the same range Universities as before. |
So only DC area high stats kids get shut out but not other area high stats kids ??? |
|
I think it is harder today than it used to be before the common app. That said, grade inflation makes it appear tougher than it really is. The reality is that many school districts graduate 20-50 percent of their classes with 3.9/4.0 unweighted. The issue is the school has to send in a profile that shows what percentage of the class had similar grades. Kids are not smarter or harder working today than they used to be. Top grades are easier to get. If your child goes to a school that graduates only 4-7 percent of its class with uw 4.0, that shows a more rigorous standard for grading. Colleges know if a 4.0 uw gpa is a dime a dozen.
If child’s school has a record of grade inflation, it is then necessary to do 4-5 years of every core subject taking the most rigorous courses offered to stand out. Electives can’t be fluff and 3 years of any core subject no longer suffices to stand out. It has to be 4 or more. I think the schools also look to see where you came from in the sense that if you are from an affluent area, born on third base, you need to prove you are willing to work hard and just getting As in hard classes isn’t enough. Does the student do that and have a job and play sports/instrument and volunteer? Kids coming from more challenging circumstances have to work and do well in school with far fewer supports. When they do well, it shows willingness to work hard through the circumstances. I am glad the schools are beginning to see the value in these kids. |
I don't know a single high stats kid that has gotten rejected from VT. They are waitlisted because VT thinks they are using it as a safety. If they stay on the waitlist they will get in because VT keeps space on the waitlist for this. |
|
The difference is that people who feel they are entitled to those spots for their kids after paying for tutoring/SAT prep/expensive ECs are being disappointed that they are not getting in everywhere as they assumed they would.
People who make a reasonable list focused on fit, including some safeties they really like are doing fine. |