TC on Lockdown?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DP. It is interesting that this is what you are quibbling about. There is enough consensus among ACPS staff members that Nolan can make that statement and those of use who work for ACPS applaud her for saying it. There is a very, very small number of staff members who do not support the return of the SROs to the schools but the vast majority does indeed support it, as do the Principals of the schools, and a majority of students.

I am “quibbling” about Nolan because Nolan has previously made completely disrespectful statements about the council people who voted not to fund the SROs going forward. Rather than agree to a proves for discussing whether SROs should return and if so, what it would look like, Nolan just wanted to get her way immediately. I think the safety concerns are real but I think the downsides of having police permanently in school is real too.

Typo - “process for discussing”

So, the building is on fire but you want to argue about which phone to use to call the fire department? Brilliant.

These comments in this post are going to age so horribly if there is a shooting in the school and a kid dies.

Nailed it. Great response to the PP.

So if the “building is on fire” (I am not saying it is not), why isn’t Hutchings doing more than whining about how hard everything is and begging for City Council to vote back funding for the SRO funding which is not a practical immediate solution. What I mean is that APD has reassigned the previous SROs by now and who knows if they are even still with APD.

What Hutchings should be doing is talking with the APD chief of police and/or the Mayor / City Manager about immediate police support from patrol officers to contend with the “building being on fire.” Hutchings should be talking about how and why his security department has failed and what is going to be done about it. Hutchings did not nothing about that. ACPS/Hutchings are just trying to pass the buck on responsibility for what has occurred and for actually fixing it in the short term.

[Anonymous]

OMG. You are so tiresome. Please just stop. You go back and forth between ranting about Hutchings and giving pedantic lectures about idiotic things. Go eat dinner and get some sleep. Things will be better in the morning and the rest of us perhaps will give a f about your opinion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:OMG. You are so tiresome. Please just stop. You go back and forth between ranting about Hutchings and giving pedantic lectures about idiotic things. Go eat dinner and get some sleep. Things will be better in the morning and the rest of us perhaps will give a f about your opinion.

Frack you

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DP. It is interesting that this is what you are quibbling about. There is enough consensus among ACPS staff members that Nolan can make that statement and those of use who work for ACPS applaud her for saying it. There is a very, very small number of staff members who do not support the return of the SROs to the schools but the vast majority does indeed support it, as do the Principals of the schools, and a majority of students.

I am “quibbling” about Nolan because Nolan has previously made completely disrespectful statements about the council people who voted not to fund the SROs going forward. Rather than agree to a proves for discussing whether SROs should return and if so, what it would look like, Nolan just wanted to get her way immediately. I think the safety concerns are real but I think the downsides of having police permanently in school is real too.

Typo - “process for discussing”

So, the building is on fire but you want to argue about which phone to use to call the fire department? Brilliant.

These comments in this post are going to age so horribly if there is a shooting in the school and a kid dies.

Nailed it. Great response to the PP.

So if the “building is on fire” (I am not saying it is not), why isn’t Hutchings doing more than whining about how hard everything is and begging for City Council to vote back funding for the SRO funding which is not a practical immediate solution. What I mean is that APD has reassigned the previous SROs by now and who knows if they are even still with APD.

What Hutchings should be doing is talking with the APD chief of police and/or the Mayor / City Manager about immediate police support from patrol officers to contend with the “building being on fire.” Hutchings should be talking about how and why his security department has failed and what is going to be done about it. Hutchings did not nothing about that. ACPS/Hutchings are just trying to pass the buck on responsibility for what has occurred and for actually fixing it in the short term.

The sueprintendent holds no sway over City Council. The role doesn't even enjoy a vote on all things school related. That something like this can occur without the actual stakeholders (students, teachers, sup, principals, etc) having an official voice is just pathetic.

It reminds me of the obscene power your HMO holds over the outcome of the decisons you DR makes.

Who knows whats best for your health? Your GP or your HMO's 23 year old call center staffer?

Who knows whats best for the schools? The families of the students, the career educators, the principals or 3 nitwits clamoring for woke points?

Chapman, Aguirre and Bennet Parker are playing games with our kid's lives.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DP. It is interesting that this is what you are quibbling about. There is enough consensus among ACPS staff members that Nolan can make that statement and those of use who work for ACPS applaud her for saying it. There is a very, very small number of staff members who do not support the return of the SROs to the schools but the vast majority does indeed support it, as do the Principals of the schools, and a majority of students.

I am “quibbling” about Nolan because Nolan has previously made completely disrespectful statements about the council people who voted not to fund the SROs going forward. Rather than agree to a proves for discussing whether SROs should return and if so, what it would look like, Nolan just wanted to get her way immediately. I think the safety concerns are real but I think the downsides of having police permanently in school is real too.

Typo - “process for discussing”

So, the building is on fire but you want to argue about which phone to use to call the fire department? Brilliant.

These comments in this post are going to age so horribly if there is a shooting in the school and a kid dies.

Nailed it. Great response to the PP.

So if the “building is on fire” (I am not saying it is not), why isn’t Hutchings doing more than whining about how hard everything is and begging for City Council to vote back funding for the SRO funding which is not a practical immediate solution. What I mean is that APD has reassigned the previous SROs by now and who knows if they are even still with APD.

What Hutchings should be doing is talking with the APD chief of police and/or the Mayor / City Manager about immediate police support from patrol officers to contend with the “building being on fire.” Hutchings should be talking about how and why his security department has failed and what is going to be done about it. Hutchings did not nothing about that. ACPS/Hutchings are just trying to pass the buck on responsibility for what has occurred and for actually fixing it in the short term.

The sueprintendent holds no sway over City Council. The role doesn't even enjoy a vote on all things school related. That something like this can occur without the actual stakeholders (students, teachers, sup, principals, etc) having an official voice is just pathetic.

It reminds me of the obscene power your HMO holds over the outcome of the decisons you DR makes.

Who knows whats best for your health? Your GP or your HMO's 23 year old call center staffer?

Who knows whats best for the schools? The families of the students, the career educators, the principals or 3 nitwits clamoring for woke points?

Chapman, Aguirre and Bennet Parker are playing games with our kid's lives.

Well said.