You guys, the PP already responded to this, and you can tell if you just read it again that she's not saying her daughter is CURRENTLY 5. She says her daughter has always been pretty, but she was popular even when she was 5, and 5 year olds probably aren't that into looks. |
+1 Great kid! |
Actually I disagree. Sounds like everyone is saying the same thing… attractive, enough intelligence to have a good sense of humor, and CONFIDENCE. |
And being fairly easygoing/laidback. |
|
I wouldn’t say my child is popular in the traditional sense (she is no Regina George), but she has always had a lot of friends at school.
So much of it is that she just clicks with the atmosphere at school. She is very liberal/alt (queer, blue hair, outspoken about social issues, involved in service projects, etc, etc) and goes to a school where so many people are like that that it’s easy for her to fit in and relate. If she were to go to the kind of school where cheerleaders were popular, I think she would just be a misfit and get bullied with the other misfits. I’m quite surprised she has so many friends. At home she is really emotionally sensitive, she has a lot of insecurities, etc. But at school she just gets along with people easily. |
The bolded is the meat of it with the other 2 as condiments on top. Without the meat, you just don't have a meal. Maybe loving parents of popular kids know the subtle details that make up their kids' personalities and think those fine details are what attract other kids. Really children on the whole are much more straightforward. |
Don't count on this. I was terrorized by the same non-cute, queen bee from 2nd grade until Senior year in high school. I was the cute little blonde girl. I wish someone would have taught me how to stand up for myself, or teach me to not let it bother me. Lacking that, the "queen bee" understood that I was a target who cared and didn't stand up for myself, and no one dared stand up to her. |
Attractive by itself is not enough. |
Meat by itself is not enough. But one of the others would do it for you. All two would be excellent for popularity (not to be confused with intimidating others a la Queen Bee.) |
| You can’t just be attractive. You have to also be outgoing I think. I was stereotypically attractive all through school (tall, thin, long shiny hair, clear skin, light eyes) but I was and am introverted and that came across as shy when I was school aged. So I wasn’t popular. I had a good group of friends, who also weren’t the popular kids so we didn’t care that we weren’t popular. We were in the middle somewhere in the social pecking order. I also think you can be popular without being attractive if you have a really dominant kind of personality. I knew many girls in school who were not beautiful (but average cute) but because they had extroverted, alpha type personalities, they became popular. My kid is 5, so I don’t know how it will go for her yet. |
You nailed the real meat. |
This is the only answer. |
| Parent of a 5 YO here and Kindergarten has felt very different than PreK. At least for my son's school, it feels like some of this sorting is starting to happen more rapidly. Agree that defining "popular" among Kindergarteners is a little ridiculous, but I can see if starting to take shape more bluntly (so and so says they don't want to be my friend) so I can imagine that's why it on the mind of Kindergarten parents. |
+1 There are a few similar types on my SM feeds. |
Mean kids, by definition, are not popular. No one likes them. |