Kamala Harris for President

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’m losing hope she’s going to win. I’ve basically accepted another Trump admin. Sorry to be a Debbie downer maybe it’s the weather but all the hype and hope we had a few weeks ago has basically fizzled and I miss don’t think she’s got the votes.

Hey look at the Republican here to sow sadness! Welcome, friend!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here's the latest polls that make a Madame President seem far more likely...
@MorningConsult
battleground tracking among LVs:

AZ: Harris 47%, Trump 49%
GA: Harris 48%, Trump 48%
MI: Harris 49%, Trump 46%
NV: Harris 48%, Trump 48%
NC: Harris 48%, Trump 48%
PA: Harris 49%, Trump 46%
WI: Harris 49%, Trump 46%

These are not great at all.

Why not? If she wins PA, her path to 270 i pretty easy.

PA is one of the biggest Trump states in the NE so don’t count on it. Biden only won by 1.4% and that’s his home state. PA is Pennsyltucky after all.


Western PA and Ohio are all Trump
Land.

She has more of a shot in Georgia than PA.

You are believing your rural Pennsyltuckey friends and family far too much. With the exception of 2016, when Trump scored PA because the Clinton campaign manager screwed up, PA has not voted for a Republican for president since Bush in 1988--36 years. Trump scored a coup when the Clinton campaign essentially relied on Pennsylvania voting reliably blue and did not defend it. Trump's went and campaigned in rural PA and some of the smaller cities and managed to get just enough votes (barely 0.5%) to win the state. Note that Biden's campaign was wise to pay attention in 2020 and they won the state by 2.2%. Harris' campaign will do that again.

The Philadelphia metropolitan area has 50% of the state voters and is reliably blue. Pittsburgh metropolitan area is blue in the most populous county, Allegheny county. The area is 20% of the state population and tends to vote about 75% Democratic, mostly in Allegheny county, the other counties tend to lean slightly red. Scranton, Allentown, Harrisburg, State College and Eric all lean blue.

So the areas that you cite as Trump county add up to barely 1/3 of the state voter population.

Trump has a very weak chance of taking Pennsylvania again as long as Harris and her surrogates campaign there, which they have been doing regularly throughout the campaign. It would be very unlikely that Trump takes PA.

+1 And Harris is not ignoring rural Pennsylvania voters.

Rural Pennsylvania voters will not vote for this left-wing California socialist.

Saying that she wants to eliminate the filibuster will not help win over swing voters.

It will when you finish the sentence, which is the fact that she will get back the rights for women that the GOP gleefully stripped from us.

What right?

The right to have full autonomy to control one's own body, health and medical treatment.

Does that apply to the covid vaccine as well?

Unless you work for the federal government, no one forced you to get vaccinated.

Plenty of employers required the covid vaccine at one point. In fact, the Harris/Walz campaign requires it as a condition of employment right now: "Harris for President requires all employees to be "up to date" on COVID-19 vaccination status as prescribed by the CDC as a condition of employment, unless otherwise prohibited by applicable law."

Is full autonomy over one's body only relevant in certain cases?

Yet women in forced birther states have no bodily autonomy and you love that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here's the latest polls that make a Madame President seem far more likely...
@MorningConsult
battleground tracking among LVs:

AZ: Harris 47%, Trump 49%
GA: Harris 48%, Trump 48%
MI: Harris 49%, Trump 46%
NV: Harris 48%, Trump 48%
NC: Harris 48%, Trump 48%
PA: Harris 49%, Trump 46%
WI: Harris 49%, Trump 46%

These are not great at all.

Why not? If she wins PA, her path to 270 i pretty easy.

PA is one of the biggest Trump states in the NE so don’t count on it. Biden only won by 1.4% and that’s his home state. PA is Pennsyltucky after all.


Western PA and Ohio are all Trump
Land.

She has more of a shot in Georgia than PA.

You are believing your rural Pennsyltuckey friends and family far too much. With the exception of 2016, when Trump scored PA because the Clinton campaign manager screwed up, PA has not voted for a Republican for president since Bush in 1988--36 years. Trump scored a coup when the Clinton campaign essentially relied on Pennsylvania voting reliably blue and did not defend it. Trump's went and campaigned in rural PA and some of the smaller cities and managed to get just enough votes (barely 0.5%) to win the state. Note that Biden's campaign was wise to pay attention in 2020 and they won the state by 2.2%. Harris' campaign will do that again.

The Philadelphia metropolitan area has 50% of the state voters and is reliably blue. Pittsburgh metropolitan area is blue in the most populous county, Allegheny county. The area is 20% of the state population and tends to vote about 75% Democratic, mostly in Allegheny county, the other counties tend to lean slightly red. Scranton, Allentown, Harrisburg, State College and Eric all lean blue.

So the areas that you cite as Trump county add up to barely 1/3 of the state voter population.

Trump has a very weak chance of taking Pennsylvania again as long as Harris and her surrogates campaign there, which they have been doing regularly throughout the campaign. It would be very unlikely that Trump takes PA.

+1 And Harris is not ignoring rural Pennsylvania voters.

Rural Pennsylvania voters will not vote for this left-wing California socialist.

Saying that she wants to eliminate the filibuster will not help win over swing voters.

It will when you finish the sentence, which is the fact that she will get back the rights for women that the GOP gleefully stripped from us.

What right?

The right to have full autonomy to control one's own body, health and medical treatment.

They have that. Plus the baby has that.

They do not have that. Two women who had ectopic pregnancies and should have been granted an abortion of the pregnancy. These women were refused treatment from hospitals afraid of the legal liability and repercussions should they treat the patients and be sued by the draconian Texas state government. These women lost their fallopian tubes and their ability to get pregnant again in the future. This should have been an easy decision, but the Texas laws caused them to become infertile. These women lost the ability to control their own health and medical treatment.
[url]
https://www.texastribune.org/2024/08/12/texas-abortion-law-ectopic-pregnancies/[/url]

This woman's water broke at 18 weeks, 5 or more weeks before viability. There is no medically known way at this point to save the baby. Or for the baby to survive until birth. But, because this baby had a heartbeat, Texas law forbade her from getting an abortion. With zero chance of life for the baby. With no time to drive to another state for an abortion, she was sent home and told to "look for signs of infection". She had to wait until she had a fever of 103 degrees, chills and shaking and was delirious and at risk of dying before the doctors considered it safe enough to perform the abortion that was indicated hours earlier before the infection signs had settled in. She developed sepsis and had to be transported to the ICU. She nearly died. She and her doctors knew that it would have been safest to have had the abortion hours before shortly after her water broke. But she didn't have the right to make the decision to avoid endangering her life to protect a baby that had no chance to live.
https://www.cnn.com/2022/11/16/health/abortion-texas-sepsis/index.html

There are many more stories out there about women who do not have the right to make decisions about their own health or control their own medical treatment.

How would you feel if you had a medical condition that could threaten your life and you were not allowed to choose the medical treatment that was most likely to safe your life? Imagine that you had an appendix on the verge of rupturing, but you were not allowed to have the appendix removed and you had to wait until the appendix ruptured, risking sepsis and risking losing your life before you were allowed to have the surgery to save your life? That's the situation these women are in.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here's the latest polls that make a Madame President seem far more likely...
@MorningConsult
battleground tracking among LVs:

AZ: Harris 47%, Trump 49%
GA: Harris 48%, Trump 48%
MI: Harris 49%, Trump 46%
NV: Harris 48%, Trump 48%
NC: Harris 48%, Trump 48%
PA: Harris 49%, Trump 46%
WI: Harris 49%, Trump 46%

These are not great at all.

Why not? If she wins PA, her path to 270 i pretty easy.

PA is one of the biggest Trump states in the NE so don’t count on it. Biden only won by 1.4% and that’s his home state. PA is Pennsyltucky after all.


Western PA and Ohio are all Trump
Land.

She has more of a shot in Georgia than PA.

You are believing your rural Pennsyltuckey friends and family far too much. With the exception of 2016, when Trump scored PA because the Clinton campaign manager screwed up, PA has not voted for a Republican for president since Bush in 1988--36 years. Trump scored a coup when the Clinton campaign essentially relied on Pennsylvania voting reliably blue and did not defend it. Trump's went and campaigned in rural PA and some of the smaller cities and managed to get just enough votes (barely 0.5%) to win the state. Note that Biden's campaign was wise to pay attention in 2020 and they won the state by 2.2%. Harris' campaign will do that again.

The Philadelphia metropolitan area has 50% of the state voters and is reliably blue. Pittsburgh metropolitan area is blue in the most populous county, Allegheny county. The area is 20% of the state population and tends to vote about 75% Democratic, mostly in Allegheny county, the other counties tend to lean slightly red. Scranton, Allentown, Harrisburg, State College and Eric all lean blue.

So the areas that you cite as Trump county add up to barely 1/3 of the state voter population.

Trump has a very weak chance of taking Pennsylvania again as long as Harris and her surrogates campaign there, which they have been doing regularly throughout the campaign. It would be very unlikely that Trump takes PA.

+1 And Harris is not ignoring rural Pennsylvania voters.

Rural Pennsylvania voters will not vote for this left-wing California socialist.

Saying that she wants to eliminate the filibuster will not help win over swing voters.

It will when you finish the sentence, which is the fact that she will get back the rights for women that the GOP gleefully stripped from us.

What right?

The right to have full autonomy to control one's own body, health and medical treatment.

Does that apply to the covid vaccine as well?

That was different. That was a case of public safety.

A pregnancy does not endanger any other citizen's health or life. At the time the vaccines were mandated, there was no treatment. This was before Paxlovid was approved for medical use. Coronavirus was known to be an extremely infectious disease that was fatal for many vulnerable subgroups of the population. So, one unvaccinated person could expose many others to the virus that could be known to kill them because there was no way to treat them.

Once paxlovid and other successful treatments (not H-ine or I-tin) were available, the vaccine mandates were dropped. But at the time, it was the only solution known to protect many in the community.

[Anonymous]

2016: no SC abortion decision
2024: SC abortion decision
We are NOT going back!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here's the latest polls that make a Madame President seem far more likely...
@MorningConsult
battleground tracking among LVs:

AZ: Harris 47%, Trump 49%
GA: Harris 48%, Trump 48%
MI: Harris 49%, Trump 46%
NV: Harris 48%, Trump 48%
NC: Harris 48%, Trump 48%
PA: Harris 49%, Trump 46%
WI: Harris 49%, Trump 46%

These are not great at all.

Why not? If she wins PA, her path to 270 i pretty easy.

PA is one of the biggest Trump states in the NE so don’t count on it. Biden only won by 1.4% and that’s his home state. PA is Pennsyltucky after all.


Western PA and Ohio are all Trump
Land.

She has more of a shot in Georgia than PA.

You are believing your rural Pennsyltuckey friends and family far too much. With the exception of 2016, when Trump scored PA because the Clinton campaign manager screwed up, PA has not voted for a Republican for president since Bush in 1988--36 years. Trump scored a coup when the Clinton campaign essentially relied on Pennsylvania voting reliably blue and did not defend it. Trump's went and campaigned in rural PA and some of the smaller cities and managed to get just enough votes (barely 0.5%) to win the state. Note that Biden's campaign was wise to pay attention in 2020 and they won the state by 2.2%. Harris' campaign will do that again.

The Philadelphia metropolitan area has 50% of the state voters and is reliably blue. Pittsburgh metropolitan area is blue in the most populous county, Allegheny county. The area is 20% of the state population and tends to vote about 75% Democratic, mostly in Allegheny county, the other counties tend to lean slightly red. Scranton, Allentown, Harrisburg, State College and Eric all lean blue.

So the areas that you cite as Trump county add up to barely 1/3 of the state voter population.

Trump has a very weak chance of taking Pennsylvania again as long as Harris and her surrogates campaign there, which they have been doing regularly throughout the campaign. It would be very unlikely that Trump takes PA.

+1 And Harris is not ignoring rural Pennsylvania voters.

Rural Pennsylvania voters will not vote for this left-wing California socialist.

Saying that she wants to eliminate the filibuster will not help win over swing voters.

It will when you finish the sentence, which is the fact that she will get back the rights for women that the GOP gleefully stripped from us.

What right?

The right to have full autonomy to control one's own body, health and medical treatment.

Does that apply to the covid vaccine as well?

Unless you work for the federal government, no one forced you to get vaccinated.

Wrong.

All th health care worker and police/fire people. Got fired in NY if they did not take the vaccine .

Employers are allowed to set the conditions of employment. Employees are allowed to comply or quit. This is America.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here's the latest polls that make a Madame President seem far more likely...
@MorningConsult
battleground tracking among LVs:

AZ: Harris 47%, Trump 49%
GA: Harris 48%, Trump 48%
MI: Harris 49%, Trump 46%
NV: Harris 48%, Trump 48%
NC: Harris 48%, Trump 48%
PA: Harris 49%, Trump 46%
WI: Harris 49%, Trump 46%

These are not great at all.

Why not? If she wins PA, her path to 270 i pretty easy.

PA is one of the biggest Trump states in the NE so don’t count on it. Biden only won by 1.4% and that’s his home state. PA is Pennsyltucky after all.


Western PA and Ohio are all Trump
Land.

She has more of a shot in Georgia than PA.

You are believing your rural Pennsyltuckey friends and family far too much. With the exception of 2016, when Trump scored PA because the Clinton campaign manager screwed up, PA has not voted for a Republican for president since Bush in 1988--36 years. Trump scored a coup when the Clinton campaign essentially relied on Pennsylvania voting reliably blue and did not defend it. Trump's went and campaigned in rural PA and some of the smaller cities and managed to get just enough votes (barely 0.5%) to win the state. Note that Biden's campaign was wise to pay attention in 2020 and they won the state by 2.2%. Harris' campaign will do that again.

The Philadelphia metropolitan area has 50% of the state voters and is reliably blue. Pittsburgh metropolitan area is blue in the most populous county, Allegheny county. The area is 20% of the state population and tends to vote about 75% Democratic, mostly in Allegheny county, the other counties tend to lean slightly red. Scranton, Allentown, Harrisburg, State College and Eric all lean blue.

So the areas that you cite as Trump county add up to barely 1/3 of the state voter population.

Trump has a very weak chance of taking Pennsylvania again as long as Harris and her surrogates campaign there, which they have been doing regularly throughout the campaign. It would be very unlikely that Trump takes PA.

+1 And Harris is not ignoring rural Pennsylvania voters.

Rural Pennsylvania voters will not vote for this left-wing California socialist.

Saying that she wants to eliminate the filibuster will not help win over swing voters.

It will when you finish the sentence, which is the fact that she will get back the rights for women that the GOP gleefully stripped from us.

What right?

The right to have full autonomy to control one's own body, health and medical treatment.

Does that apply to the covid vaccine as well?

Unless you work for the federal government, no one forced you to get vaccinated.

Plenty of employers required the covid vaccine at one point. In fact, the Harris/Walz campaign requires it as a condition of employment right now: "Harris for President requires all employees to be "up to date" on COVID-19 vaccination status as prescribed by the CDC as a condition of employment, unless otherwise prohibited by applicable law."

Is full autonomy over one's body only relevant in certain cases?

Apples and oranges. You an always choose not to get the vaccine and not to work for those employers. You are not required to work for any employer that has a vaccine requirement. Employment for those employers is voluntary. The number of employers that have vaccine requirements is less than 1/3 of employers. You are welcome to work for any of the 2/3+ other employers out there and not be vaccinated.

A pregnant woman who is in danger of losing her fertility or dying, does not have the choice to not get pregnant any more.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’m losing hope she’s going to win. I’ve basically accepted another Trump admin. Sorry to be a Debbie downer maybe it’s the weather but all the hype and hope we had a few weeks ago has basically fizzled and I miss don’t think she’s got the votes.

You are not the only one to think this way.
Ask yourself, have you tried to help one orangehad-felon-voting person change their decision to even think of voting for that orange head felon? If you have not, go out there (or from inside your place) and DO SOMETHING! If each sane one of us can change the mind if just one to vote Harris, we are not going back.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here's the latest polls that make a Madame President seem far more likely...
@MorningConsult
battleground tracking among LVs:

AZ: Harris 47%, Trump 49%
GA: Harris 48%, Trump 48%
MI: Harris 49%, Trump 46%
NV: Harris 48%, Trump 48%
NC: Harris 48%, Trump 48%
PA: Harris 49%, Trump 46%
WI: Harris 49%, Trump 46%

These are not great at all.

Why not? If she wins PA, her path to 270 i pretty easy.

PA is one of the biggest Trump states in the NE so don’t count on it. Biden only won by 1.4% and that’s his home state. PA is Pennsyltucky after all.


Western PA and Ohio are all Trump
Land.

She has more of a shot in Georgia than PA.

You are believing your rural Pennsyltuckey friends and family far too much. With the exception of 2016, when Trump scored PA because the Clinton campaign manager screwed up, PA has not voted for a Republican for president since Bush in 1988--36 years. Trump scored a coup when the Clinton campaign essentially relied on Pennsylvania voting reliably blue and did not defend it. Trump's went and campaigned in rural PA and some of the smaller cities and managed to get just enough votes (barely 0.5%) to win the state. Note that Biden's campaign was wise to pay attention in 2020 and they won the state by 2.2%. Harris' campaign will do that again.

The Philadelphia metropolitan area has 50% of the state voters and is reliably blue. Pittsburgh metropolitan area is blue in the most populous county, Allegheny county. The area is 20% of the state population and tends to vote about 75% Democratic, mostly in Allegheny county, the other counties tend to lean slightly red. Scranton, Allentown, Harrisburg, State College and Eric all lean blue.

So the areas that you cite as Trump county add up to barely 1/3 of the state voter population.

Trump has a very weak chance of taking Pennsylvania again as long as Harris and her surrogates campaign there, which they have been doing regularly throughout the campaign. It would be very unlikely that Trump takes PA.

+1 And Harris is not ignoring rural Pennsylvania voters.

Rural Pennsylvania voters will not vote for this left-wing California socialist.

Saying that she wants to eliminate the filibuster will not help win over swing voters.

It will when you finish the sentence, which is the fact that she will get back the rights for women that the GOP gleefully stripped from us.

What right?

The right to have full autonomy to control one's own body, health and medical treatment.

Does that apply to the covid vaccine as well?

That was different. That was a case of public safety.

A pregnancy does not endanger any other citizen's health or life. At the time the vaccines were mandated, there was no treatment. This was before Paxlovid was approved for medical use. Coronavirus was known to be an extremely infectious disease that was fatal for many vulnerable subgroups of the population. So, one unvaccinated person could expose many others to the virus that could be known to kill them because there was no way to treat them.

Once paxlovid and other successful treatments (not H-ine or I-tin) were available, the vaccine mandates were dropped. But at the time, it was the only solution known to protect many in the community.

So, in the case of the covid vaccine, there are limits on full body autonomy due to a potential injury to another person from that autonomy. But, there should not be limits on full body autonomy due to an injury to another person from that autonomy, if the other person is a baby?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here's the latest polls that make a Madame President seem far more likely...
@MorningConsult
battleground tracking among LVs:

AZ: Harris 47%, Trump 49%
GA: Harris 48%, Trump 48%
MI: Harris 49%, Trump 46%
NV: Harris 48%, Trump 48%
NC: Harris 48%, Trump 48%
PA: Harris 49%, Trump 46%
WI: Harris 49%, Trump 46%

These are not great at all.

Why not? If she wins PA, her path to 270 i pretty easy.

PA is one of the biggest Trump states in the NE so don’t count on it. Biden only won by 1.4% and that’s his home state. PA is Pennsyltucky after all.


Western PA and Ohio are all Trump
Land.

She has more of a shot in Georgia than PA.

You are believing your rural Pennsyltuckey friends and family far too much. With the exception of 2016, when Trump scored PA because the Clinton campaign manager screwed up, PA has not voted for a Republican for president since Bush in 1988--36 years. Trump scored a coup when the Clinton campaign essentially relied on Pennsylvania voting reliably blue and did not defend it. Trump's went and campaigned in rural PA and some of the smaller cities and managed to get just enough votes (barely 0.5%) to win the state. Note that Biden's campaign was wise to pay attention in 2020 and they won the state by 2.2%. Harris' campaign will do that again.

The Philadelphia metropolitan area has 50% of the state voters and is reliably blue. Pittsburgh metropolitan area is blue in the most populous county, Allegheny county. The area is 20% of the state population and tends to vote about 75% Democratic, mostly in Allegheny county, the other counties tend to lean slightly red. Scranton, Allentown, Harrisburg, State College and Eric all lean blue.

So the areas that you cite as Trump county add up to barely 1/3 of the state voter population.

Trump has a very weak chance of taking Pennsylvania again as long as Harris and her surrogates campaign there, which they have been doing regularly throughout the campaign. It would be very unlikely that Trump takes PA.

+1 And Harris is not ignoring rural Pennsylvania voters.

Rural Pennsylvania voters will not vote for this left-wing California socialist.

Saying that she wants to eliminate the filibuster will not help win over swing voters.

It will when you finish the sentence, which is the fact that she will get back the rights for women that the GOP gleefully stripped from us.

What right?

The right to have full autonomy to control one's own body, health and medical treatment.

Does that apply to the covid vaccine as well?

That was different. That was a case of public safety.

A pregnancy does not endanger any other citizen's health or life. At the time the vaccines were mandated, there was no treatment. This was before Paxlovid was approved for medical use. Coronavirus was known to be an extremely infectious disease that was fatal for many vulnerable subgroups of the population. So, one unvaccinated person could expose many others to the virus that could be known to kill them because there was no way to treat them.

Once paxlovid and other successful treatments (not H-ine or I-tin) were available, the vaccine mandates were dropped. But at the time, it was the only solution known to protect many in the community.

So, in the case of the covid vaccine, there are limits on full body autonomy due to a potential injury to another person from that autonomy. But, there should not be limits on full body autonomy due to an injury to another person from that autonomy, if the other person is a baby?

Fetuses aren’t babies

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here's the latest polls that make a Madame President seem far more likely...
@MorningConsult
battleground tracking among LVs:

AZ: Harris 47%, Trump 49%
GA: Harris 48%, Trump 48%
MI: Harris 49%, Trump 46%
NV: Harris 48%, Trump 48%
NC: Harris 48%, Trump 48%
PA: Harris 49%, Trump 46%
WI: Harris 49%, Trump 46%

These are not great at all.

Why not? If she wins PA, her path to 270 i pretty easy.

PA is one of the biggest Trump states in the NE so don’t count on it. Biden only won by 1.4% and that’s his home state. PA is Pennsyltucky after all.


Western PA and Ohio are all Trump
Land.

She has more of a shot in Georgia than PA.

You are believing your rural Pennsyltuckey friends and family far too much. With the exception of 2016, when Trump scored PA because the Clinton campaign manager screwed up, PA has not voted for a Republican for president since Bush in 1988--36 years. Trump scored a coup when the Clinton campaign essentially relied on Pennsylvania voting reliably blue and did not defend it. Trump's went and campaigned in rural PA and some of the smaller cities and managed to get just enough votes (barely 0.5%) to win the state. Note that Biden's campaign was wise to pay attention in 2020 and they won the state by 2.2%. Harris' campaign will do that again.

The Philadelphia metropolitan area has 50% of the state voters and is reliably blue. Pittsburgh metropolitan area is blue in the most populous county, Allegheny county. The area is 20% of the state population and tends to vote about 75% Democratic, mostly in Allegheny county, the other counties tend to lean slightly red. Scranton, Allentown, Harrisburg, State College and Eric all lean blue.

So the areas that you cite as Trump county add up to barely 1/3 of the state voter population.

Trump has a very weak chance of taking Pennsylvania again as long as Harris and her surrogates campaign there, which they have been doing regularly throughout the campaign. It would be very unlikely that Trump takes PA.

+1 And Harris is not ignoring rural Pennsylvania voters.

Rural Pennsylvania voters will not vote for this left-wing California socialist.

Saying that she wants to eliminate the filibuster will not help win over swing voters.

It will when you finish the sentence, which is the fact that she will get back the rights for women that the GOP gleefully stripped from us.

What right?

The right to have full autonomy to control one's own body, health and medical treatment.

Does that apply to the covid vaccine as well?

That was different. That was a case of public safety.

A pregnancy does not endanger any other citizen's health or life. At the time the vaccines were mandated, there was no treatment. This was before Paxlovid was approved for medical use. Coronavirus was known to be an extremely infectious disease that was fatal for many vulnerable subgroups of the population. So, one unvaccinated person could expose many others to the virus that could be known to kill them because there was no way to treat them.

Once paxlovid and other successful treatments (not H-ine or I-tin) were available, the vaccine mandates were dropped. But at the time, it was the only solution known to protect many in the community.

So, in the case of the covid vaccine, there are limits on full body autonomy due to a potential injury to another person from that autonomy. But, there should not be limits on full body autonomy due to an injury to another person from that autonomy, if the other person is a baby?

Fetuses aren’t babies

The forced birthers just can’t seem to understand that concept no matter how many times it’s explained to them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here's the latest polls that make a Madame President seem far more likely...
@MorningConsult
battleground tracking among LVs:

AZ: Harris 47%, Trump 49%
GA: Harris 48%, Trump 48%
MI: Harris 49%, Trump 46%
NV: Harris 48%, Trump 48%
NC: Harris 48%, Trump 48%
PA: Harris 49%, Trump 46%
WI: Harris 49%, Trump 46%

These are not great at all.

Why not? If she wins PA, her path to 270 i pretty easy.

PA is one of the biggest Trump states in the NE so don’t count on it. Biden only won by 1.4% and that’s his home state. PA is Pennsyltucky after all.


Western PA and Ohio are all Trump
Land.

She has more of a shot in Georgia than PA.

You are believing your rural Pennsyltuckey friends and family far too much. With the exception of 2016, when Trump scored PA because the Clinton campaign manager screwed up, PA has not voted for a Republican for president since Bush in 1988--36 years. Trump scored a coup when the Clinton campaign essentially relied on Pennsylvania voting reliably blue and did not defend it. Trump's went and campaigned in rural PA and some of the smaller cities and managed to get just enough votes (barely 0.5%) to win the state. Note that Biden's campaign was wise to pay attention in 2020 and they won the state by 2.2%. Harris' campaign will do that again.

The Philadelphia metropolitan area has 50% of the state voters and is reliably blue. Pittsburgh metropolitan area is blue in the most populous county, Allegheny county. The area is 20% of the state population and tends to vote about 75% Democratic, mostly in Allegheny county, the other counties tend to lean slightly red. Scranton, Allentown, Harrisburg, State College and Eric all lean blue.

So the areas that you cite as Trump county add up to barely 1/3 of the state voter population.

Trump has a very weak chance of taking Pennsylvania again as long as Harris and her surrogates campaign there, which they have been doing regularly throughout the campaign. It would be very unlikely that Trump takes PA.

+1 And Harris is not ignoring rural Pennsylvania voters.

Rural Pennsylvania voters will not vote for this left-wing California socialist.

Saying that she wants to eliminate the filibuster will not help win over swing voters.

It will when you finish the sentence, which is the fact that she will get back the rights for women that the GOP gleefully stripped from us.

What right?

The right to have full autonomy to control one's own body, health and medical treatment.

Does that apply to the covid vaccine as well?

That was different. That was a case of public safety.

A pregnancy does not endanger any other citizen's health or life. At the time the vaccines were mandated, there was no treatment. This was before Paxlovid was approved for medical use. Coronavirus was known to be an extremely infectious disease that was fatal for many vulnerable subgroups of the population. So, one unvaccinated person could expose many others to the virus that could be known to kill them because there was no way to treat them.

Once paxlovid and other successful treatments (not H-ine or I-tin) were available, the vaccine mandates were dropped. But at the time, it was the only solution known to protect many in the community.

So, in the case of the covid vaccine, there are limits on full body autonomy due to a potential injury to another person from that autonomy. But, there should not be limits on full body autonomy due to an injury to another person from that autonomy, if the other person is a baby?

The Constitution says that the baby has to be US born before it has rights. Until the point of viability, the fetus is not a person and has no protection under the US Constitution and laws. The 14th amendment provides protections for "All persons born or naturalized in the United States... ". So, until the fetus is born, it is not a person protected by law.

I am fully supportive of these abortion bans only for life or health of mother AFTER the point of viability. But abortion bans at 6, 12, 15, 18 weeks or anywhere below viability (typically around 23 weeks), is not appropriate.

[Anonymous]

I think she's too short to be elected president. She's only 5'4
The only President that short was James Madison, and that was like 200 years ago. And of course he practically authored the Constitution, so maybe he got some credit for that. Kamala has nothing remotely comparable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here's the latest polls that make a Madame President seem far more likely...
@MorningConsult
battleground tracking among LVs:

AZ: Harris 47%, Trump 49%
GA: Harris 48%, Trump 48%
MI: Harris 49%, Trump 46%
NV: Harris 48%, Trump 48%
NC: Harris 48%, Trump 48%
PA: Harris 49%, Trump 46%
WI: Harris 49%, Trump 46%

These are not great at all.

Why not? If she wins PA, her path to 270 i pretty easy.

PA is one of the biggest Trump states in the NE so don’t count on it. Biden only won by 1.4% and that’s his home state. PA is Pennsyltucky after all.


Western PA and Ohio are all Trump
Land.

She has more of a shot in Georgia than PA.

You are believing your rural Pennsyltuckey friends and family far too much. With the exception of 2016, when Trump scored PA because the Clinton campaign manager screwed up, PA has not voted for a Republican for president since Bush in 1988--36 years. Trump scored a coup when the Clinton campaign essentially relied on Pennsylvania voting reliably blue and did not defend it. Trump's went and campaigned in rural PA and some of the smaller cities and managed to get just enough votes (barely 0.5%) to win the state. Note that Biden's campaign was wise to pay attention in 2020 and they won the state by 2.2%. Harris' campaign will do that again.

The Philadelphia metropolitan area has 50% of the state voters and is reliably blue. Pittsburgh metropolitan area is blue in the most populous county, Allegheny county. The area is 20% of the state population and tends to vote about 75% Democratic, mostly in Allegheny county, the other counties tend to lean slightly red. Scranton, Allentown, Harrisburg, State College and Eric all lean blue.

So the areas that you cite as Trump county add up to barely 1/3 of the state voter population.

Trump has a very weak chance of taking Pennsylvania again as long as Harris and her surrogates campaign there, which they have been doing regularly throughout the campaign. It would be very unlikely that Trump takes PA.

+1 And Harris is not ignoring rural Pennsylvania voters.

Rural Pennsylvania voters will not vote for this left-wing California socialist.

Saying that she wants to eliminate the filibuster will not help win over swing voters.

It will when you finish the sentence, which is the fact that she will get back the rights for women that the GOP gleefully stripped from us.

What right?

The right to have full autonomy to control one's own body, health and medical treatment.

Does that apply to the covid vaccine as well?

That was different. That was a case of public safety.

A pregnancy does not endanger any other citizen's health or life. At the time the vaccines were mandated, there was no treatment. This was before Paxlovid was approved for medical use. Coronavirus was known to be an extremely infectious disease that was fatal for many vulnerable subgroups of the population. So, one unvaccinated person could expose many others to the virus that could be known to kill them because there was no way to treat them.

Once paxlovid and other successful treatments (not H-ine or I-tin) were available, the vaccine mandates were dropped. But at the time, it was the only solution known to protect many in the community.

So, in the case of the covid vaccine, there are limits on full body autonomy due to a potential injury to another person from that autonomy. But, there should not be limits on full body autonomy due to an injury to another person from that autonomy, if the other person is a baby?

Fetuses aren’t babies

They will be if you leave them alone.

[Anonymous]

So naive, get an education