Epstein Files

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's fake,
Totally fake.
Somebotty forged it back then,
And somehow got it into the birthday book, in 2003.

Because they knew it would come in handy 22 years later,
As a way to put out fake news on Trump.

And it's a disgrace.

It's like republicans no longer have any common sense.

It's a hoax! /s

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where is Mitch McConnell in all this??

He put out a statement a couple of days ago lamenting the state of the country.

Despicable. Too bad he didn’t consider how his many actions paved the road for Trump.

He is a huge contributor to the demise of our country and the creation of the corrupt, rubber-stamp, ridiculous SCOTUS. Who cares what that saggy evil old windbag thinks now.

[Anonymous]

So, is anything going to come of this? I am not hearing a lot of outrage. Is everyone just going to move on?

[Anonymous]

The estate is supposedly sending more information over. That was only the first tranche.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So, is anything going to come of this? I am not hearing a lot of outrage. Is everyone just going to move on?

MAGA is going to ignore it in favor of the stories that are better for them like the Charlotte metro stabbing and Charlie Kirk being shot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why can't we see the entire "Birthday Book"?

There is a link to the entire document on the House Oversight Committee website.

In the index to the book, https://drive.google.com/drive/mobile/folders/1ZSVpXEhI7gKI0zatJdYe6QhKJ5pjUo4b

What are the names of the two Friend contributors that are blacked out?

One comes alphabetically between Black and Brunel. The other comes between Rosovsky and Wexner.

PP here -- Ha, I'm slow! Obviously the second blackout is Trump.

Actually, Trump's name is listed there right before Rosovsky, out of alphabetical order. So it's somebody else.

Oh right! On what grounds does someone other than victims merit redaction?

Perhaps somebody who was underage at the time, or maybe a "friend" that is also considered a victim?
Obviously the names listed under CHILDREN have all been redacted, but I feel so sorry for whatever kids wrote the stuff in this book. It's so f'ed up.

I can’t get this photo out of my mind. Trump didn’t keep little Ivanka away from Epstein.

I hope Ivanka breaks her silence. Her dad is an obvious pedo who probably leveraged her innocence to these men (and maybe to himself).

At the US Open, hTrump's granddaughter, Arabella age 14, did not want to sit next to her grandfather even though her father Jared told her to sit next to her pedophile grandfather. What is wrong with her parents?

A) Jared really didn’t want to sit next to Trump

B) Positioning Arabella next to Trump was supposed to soften Trump’s image, make him look grandfatherly, dissuade the crowd from booing him because his granddaughter was right there

C) Both A and B

[Anonymous]

Can someone explain what Schumer did today? Why are we discussing this today instead of a year or years ago when the Epstein files first were compiled?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why can't we see the entire "Birthday Book"?

There is a link to the entire document on the House Oversight Committee website.

In the index to the book, https://drive.google.com/drive/mobile/folders/1ZSVpXEhI7gKI0zatJdYe6QhKJ5pjUo4b

What are the names of the two Friend contributors that are blacked out?

One comes alphabetically between Black and Brunel. The other comes between Rosovsky and Wexner.

PP here -- Ha, I'm slow! Obviously the second blackout is Trump.

Actually, Trump's name is listed there right before Rosovsky, out of alphabetical order. So it's somebody else.

Oh right! On what grounds does someone other than victims merit redaction?

Perhaps somebody who was underage at the time, or maybe a "friend" that is also considered a victim?
Obviously the names listed under CHILDREN have all been redacted, but I feel so sorry for whatever kids wrote the stuff in this book. It's so f'ed up.

I can’t get this photo out of my mind. Trump didn’t keep little Ivanka away from Epstein.

I hope Ivanka breaks her silence. Her dad is an obvious pedo who probably leveraged her innocence to these men (and maybe to himself).

At the US Open, hTrump's granddaughter, Arabella age 14, did not want to sit next to her grandfather even though her father Jared told her to sit next to her pedophile grandfather. What is wrong with her parents?

A) Jared really didn’t want to sit next to Trump

B) Positioning Arabella next to Trump was supposed to soften Trump’s image, make him look grandfatherly, dissuade the crowd from booing him because his granddaughter was right there

C) Both A and B

See image of poster 9/10 11:46. Disgusting. 🤮

[Anonymous]

Charlie Kirk shooting is tragic.

I sure hope it’s not Current Administration or foreign entity to detract attention on Trump and the Epstein files.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why can't we see the entire "Birthday Book"?

There is a link to the entire document on the House Oversight Committee website.

In the index to the book, https://drive.google.com/drive/mobile/folders/1ZSVpXEhI7gKI0zatJdYe6QhKJ5pjUo4b

What are the names of the two Friend contributors that are blacked out?

One comes alphabetically between Black and Brunel. The other comes between Rosovsky and Wexner.

PP here -- Ha, I'm slow! Obviously the second blackout is Trump.

Actually, Trump's name is listed there right before Rosovsky, out of alphabetical order. So it's somebody else.

Oh right! On what grounds does someone other than victims merit redaction?

Perhaps somebody who was underage at the time, or maybe a "friend" that is also considered a victim?
Obviously the names listed under CHILDREN have all been redacted, but I feel so sorry for whatever kids wrote the stuff in this book. It's so f'ed up.

I can’t get this photo out of my mind. Trump didn’t keep little Ivanka away from Epstein.

I hope Ivanka breaks her silence. Her dad is an obvious pedo who probably leveraged her innocence to these men (and maybe to himself).

At the US Open, hTrump's granddaughter, Arabella age 14, did not want to sit next to her grandfather even though her father Jared told her to sit next to her pedophile grandfather. What is wrong with her parents?

A) Jared really didn’t want to sit next to Trump

B) Positioning Arabella next to Trump was supposed to soften Trump’s image, make him look grandfatherly, dissuade the crowd from booing him because his granddaughter was right there

C) Both A and B

Whatever her reason, she did not want to be near him
And her father should have listened to her. It is highly likely he has made inappropriate comments to her or put his little hands on her

[Anonymous]

Looks like Mandelson will be out over Epstein correspondence. The walls are closing in on these people.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/sep/10/mandelson-more-very-embarrassing-details-of-epstein-friendship-to-come

[Anonymous]

And hardly any news about Trump and Epstein in the Washington Post and other US news outlets.

Share links and sources if I’m mistaken.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Looks like Mandelson will be out over Epstein correspondence. The walls are closing in on these people.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/sep/10/mandelson-more-very-embarrassing-details-of-epstein-friendship-to-come

One of these scumbags will sing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Looks like Mandelson will be out over Epstein correspondence. The walls are closing in on these people.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/sep/10/mandelson-more-very-embarrassing-details-of-epstein-friendship-to-come

Rich people must have an Epstein photos auto-reply at this point.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like Mandelson will be out over Epstein correspondence. The walls are closing in on these people.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/sep/10/mandelson-more-very-embarrassing-details-of-epstein-friendship-to-come

One of these scumbags will sing.

For sure.