+1 The media hates Democrats (until they win, at which point they love them for about ten minutes and then it’s back to the “but here’s how that’s bad for Biden” and “thanks, Obama”). They enjoy bullying them and pushing them around, slapping them for fun and never holding the GOP to the same standards. |
No. A mini primary and brokered convention would have produced a stronger candidate. |
Yes, media hates Dems so much that they created a pathway for Biden to be convinced to get the heck out of the way so that a more fit candidate could make sure we don't have another four years of Trump in The White House. Lol... you're a real genius buttercup |
Right back at you, creeping bellflower. They didn’t really think they could get Biden out. They just enjoyed dinging him for their own pleasure. Much like how they - and snowed people like you - choose not to notice that not only is Trump old, but he’s also deranged. You should do as VP Harris, not a convicted felon like Trump is, invited and you should go watch a Trump speech in its entirety, if you can even find such a thing as the media goes out of its way to sanewash Trump. People who are forced to listen to him at length come away understanding he’s a puppet, and not a very good one. |
No, because those very processes would have torn everybody apart with only a few months to put the winner back together. |
The Republican who posted that knows that; they’re feeling very burnt that Biden did the right thing and now the Democratic Party has an intelligent, magnetic candidate who chose a good, solid, decent running mate and they have a felon and a guy who can’t stop fondling couches at campaign events. |
There are plenty of stronger candidates, but none that are more electable than Harris. Even though Harris has her issues and those who will not support her, in general, as sitting VPOTUS, she is the best person to consolidate the party right now and her work over the last 8 weeks has shown that. There is no one else who would have been able to be competitive with Trump in 8 weeks time. And there are no other currently nationally known candidates that would have been able to get a presidential campaign up and running in 4 weeks, like she was. As the second on the ticket, she was able to take over the running Biden-Harris campaign offices, the war chest, and the staffing and keep things rolling. She had the staff available to help her get in contact with all delegates within 48 hours to consolidate the party ticket. If Biden had stepped down in March, there would have been better candidates available and it might have been a horse race, but frankly, there were no other candidates who could have gotten their campaign to a competitive level in the time left when Biden actually stepped down. |
If by media you are referring to Fox News or MSNBC, yes, they have politically biased intentions within all of their reporting and that's why normal people don't watch those networks. If you watched the George Stephanopoulos interview with Biden in July, you would have clearly seen how that MSM interview cleared a path for Biden to remove himself from the race so that a more fit Dem nominee could make sure Trump doesn't win this election. If MSM had any desire for Trump to be re-elected, they would have done everything in their power to keep Biden in the race. How is this so difficult for you to understand? |
Nice. Lincoln Project has done some good ads but where are they shown? |
Defund police, against deporting illegal criminal migrants, abolition of ICE…… https://www.livemint.com/news/us-news/down-for-deportation-us-vp-kamala-harris-old-video-of-protest-goes-viral-us-elections-2024-donald-trump-watch/amp-11727141017365.html |
How are those positions socialist? |
Just because a particular policy is a poor policy doesn't mean that it is product of socialism, dimwit. |