Sydney Sweeney / American Eagle Controversy

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Nobody actually thinks that mannish thing is more appealing than a curvy blonde hair blue doe eyed big boobed coquet.

I don’t find Rachel Zigler incredibly attractive but neither is Sydney Sweeney. She’s incredibly sexy and hot. Her face is not blue for eyed. If she weren’t blonde and didn’t have those two other assets (which are impressive) she wouldn’t be nearly as popular as she is.

Stage actors don’t have to be as “hot” as television and movie actors. Also Rachel has never been sold as supposedly hot, I don’t know why people are comparing the two out of nowhere. Her talent is being good at musical theater, nobody pays her to do anything else. They really aren’t comparable people.

Rachel is a movie actress- she has played the lead female character in several movies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Nobody actually thinks that mannish thing is more appealing than a curvy blonde hair blue doe eyed big boobed coquet.

I don’t find Rachel Zigler incredibly attractive but neither is Sydney Sweeney. She’s incredibly sexy and hot. Her face is not blue for eyed. If she weren’t blonde and didn’t have those two other assets (which are impressive) she wouldn’t be nearly as popular as she is.

+1 people agree with you. They always talk about her two assets, no one ever mentions her face.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Nobody actually thinks that mannish thing is more appealing than a curvy blonde hair blue doe eyed big boobed coquet.

I don’t find Rachel Zigler incredibly attractive but neither is Sydney Sweeney. She’s incredibly sexy and hot. Her face is not blue for eyed. If she weren’t blonde and didn’t have those two other assets (which are impressive) she wouldn’t be nearly as popular as she is.

Stage actors don’t have to be as “hot” as television and movie actors. Also Rachel has never been sold as supposedly hot, I don’t know why people are comparing the two out of nowhere. Her talent is being good at musical theater, nobody pays her to do anything else. They really aren’t comparable people.

Rachel is a movie actress- she has played the lead female character in several movies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Nobody actually thinks that mannish thing is more appealing than a curvy blonde hair blue doe eyed big boobed coquet.

I don’t find Rachel Zigler incredibly attractive but neither is Sydney Sweeney. She’s incredibly sexy and hot. Her face is not blue for eyed. If she weren’t blonde and didn’t have those two other assets (which are impressive) she wouldn’t be nearly as popular as she is.

+1 people agree with you. They always talk about her two assets, no one ever mentions her face.

Who cares about her face when she looks like that?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Nobody actually thinks that mannish thing is more appealing than a curvy blonde hair blue doe eyed big boobed coquet.

I don’t find Rachel Zigler incredibly attractive but neither is Sydney Sweeney. She’s incredibly sexy and hot. Her face is not blue for eyed. If she weren’t blonde and didn’t have those two other assets (which are impressive) she wouldn’t be nearly as popular as she is.

Stage actors don’t have to be as “hot” as television and movie actors. Also Rachel has never been sold as supposedly hot, I don’t know why people are comparing the two out of nowhere. Her talent is being good at musical theater, nobody pays her to do anything else. They really aren’t comparable people.

Rachel is a movie actress- she has played the lead female character in several movies.

Yes but most of her roles require her to sing and or dance, that is what she gets paid for, she doesn’t get paid to be hot. I want to see Rachel vocal frying on a Jeans ad as much as I want to hear Sydney Sweeney attempt to sing lead on West Side Story.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Nobody actually thinks that mannish thing is more appealing than a curvy blonde hair blue doe eyed big boobed coquet.

I don’t find Rachel Zigler incredibly attractive but neither is Sydney Sweeney. She’s incredibly sexy and hot. Her face is not blue for eyed. If she weren’t blonde and didn’t have those two other assets (which are impressive) she wouldn’t be nearly as popular as she is.

Stage actors don’t have to be as “hot” as television and movie actors. Also Rachel has never been sold as supposedly hot, I don’t know why people are comparing the two out of nowhere. Her talent is being good at musical theater, nobody pays her to do anything else. They really aren’t comparable people.

Rachel is a movie actress- she has played the lead female character in several movies.

Yes but most of her roles require her to sing and or dance, that is what she gets paid for, she doesn’t get paid to be hot. I want to see Rachel vocal frying on a Jeans ad as much as I want to hear Sydney Sweeney attempt to sing lead on West Side Story.

Irony is dead. How dare you criticize Sydney Sweeney’s genes/jeans ad! Let’s all pile on Rachel Ziegler for daring to play Snow White.

[Anonymous]

Fit blond women ARE LITERALLY HITLER !!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Nobody actually thinks that mannish thing is more appealing than a curvy blonde hair blue doe eyed big boobed coquet.

I don’t find Rachel Zigler incredibly attractive but neither is Sydney Sweeney. She’s incredibly sexy and hot. Her face is not blue for eyed. If she weren’t blonde and didn’t have those two other assets (which are impressive) she wouldn’t be nearly as popular as she is.

Stage actors don’t have to be as “hot” as television and movie actors. Also Rachel has never been sold as supposedly hot, I don’t know why people are comparing the two out of nowhere. Her talent is being good at musical theater, nobody pays her to do anything else. They really aren’t comparable people.

Rachel is a movie actress- she has played the lead female character in several movies.

Yes but most of her roles require her to sing and or dance, that is what she gets paid for, she doesn’t get paid to be hot. I want to see Rachel vocal frying on a Jeans ad as much as I want to hear Sydney Sweeney attempt to sing lead on West Side Story.

Irony is dead. How dare you criticize Sydney Sweeney’s genes/jeans ad! Let’s all pile on Rachel Ziegler for daring to play Snow White.

The original point was that someone said SS’s career would now be over for being considered conservative. The counter point is look at Rachel Zegler and her career for her own outspokeness. She singlehandedly caused Snow White to flop. I don’t think Sydney’s career is in as much trouble.

[Anonymous]

How old is Sydney Sweeney? The ad looked like child porn to me. Like an Epstein video.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Nobody actually thinks that mannish thing is more appealing than a curvy blonde hair blue doe eyed big boobed coquet.

I don’t find Rachel Zigler incredibly attractive but neither is Sydney Sweeney. She’s incredibly sexy and hot. Her face is not blue for eyed. If she weren’t blonde and didn’t have those two other assets (which are impressive) she wouldn’t be nearly as popular as she is.

Stage actors don’t have to be as “hot” as television and movie actors. Also Rachel has never been sold as supposedly hot, I don’t know why people are comparing the two out of nowhere. Her talent is being good at musical theater, nobody pays her to do anything else. They really aren’t comparable people.

Rachel is a movie actress- she has played the lead female character in several movies.

Yes but most of her roles require her to sing and or dance, that is what she gets paid for, she doesn’t get paid to be hot. I want to see Rachel vocal frying on a Jeans ad as much as I want to hear Sydney Sweeney attempt to sing lead on West Side Story.

Irony is dead. How dare you criticize Sydney Sweeney’s genes/jeans ad! Let’s all pile on Rachel Ziegler for daring to play Snow White.

The witch was whiter than her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How old is Sydney Sweeney? The ad looked like child porn to me. Like an Epstein video.

.

27

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Fit blond women ARE LITERALLY HITLER !!

The word is blonde and this is a poor use of troll energy. Keep trying.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Nobody actually thinks that mannish thing is more appealing than a curvy blonde hair blue doe eyed big boobed coquet.

I don’t find Rachel Zigler incredibly attractive but neither is Sydney Sweeney. She’s incredibly sexy and hot. Her face is not blue for eyed. If she weren’t blonde and didn’t have those two other assets (which are impressive) she wouldn’t be nearly as popular as she is.

Stage actors don’t have to be as “hot” as television and movie actors. Also Rachel has never been sold as supposedly hot, I don’t know why people are comparing the two out of nowhere. Her talent is being good at musical theater, nobody pays her to do anything else. They really aren’t comparable people.

Rachel is a movie actress- she has played the lead female character in several movies.

Yes but most of her roles require her to sing and or dance, that is what she gets paid for, she doesn’t get paid to be hot. I want to see Rachel vocal frying on a Jeans ad as much as I want to hear Sydney Sweeney attempt to sing lead on West Side Story.

Irony is dead. How dare you criticize Sydney Sweeney’s genes/jeans ad! Let’s all pile on Rachel Ziegler for daring to play Snow White.

The witch was whiter than her.

Hah! You can stop beating the dead horse. Irony is really, truly dead now. No need to continue.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Nobody actually thinks that mannish thing is more appealing than a curvy blonde hair blue doe eyed big boobed coquet.

I don’t find Rachel Zigler incredibly attractive but neither is Sydney Sweeney. She’s incredibly sexy and hot. Her face is not blue for eyed. If she weren’t blonde and didn’t have those two other assets (which are impressive) she wouldn’t be nearly as popular as she is.

Stage actors don’t have to be as “hot” as television and movie actors. Also Rachel has never been sold as supposedly hot, I don’t know why people are comparing the two out of nowhere. Her talent is being good at musical theater, nobody pays her to do anything else. They really aren’t comparable people.

Rachel is a movie actress- she has played the lead female character in several movies.

Yes but most of her roles require her to sing and or dance, that is what she gets paid for, she doesn’t get paid to be hot. I want to see Rachel vocal frying on a Jeans ad as much as I want to hear Sydney Sweeney attempt to sing lead on West Side Story.

Irony is dead. How dare you criticize Sydney Sweeney’s genes/jeans ad! Let’s all pile on Rachel Ziegler for daring to play Snow White.

The witch was whiter than her.

Hah! You can stop beating the dead horse. Irony is really, truly dead now. No need to continue.

Just stating facts. That’s why the movie flopped, along with her career. It was poor woke casting. And she’s not pretty and the storyline was she’s the most beautiful in all of the land. That’s more subjective though, but she’s definitely not white as snow. Feel bad that role will haunt her for life. Sydney will always have great jeans.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Nobody actually thinks that mannish thing is more appealing than a curvy blonde hair blue doe eyed big boobed coquet.

I don’t find Rachel Zigler incredibly attractive but neither is Sydney Sweeney. She’s incredibly sexy and hot. Her face is not blue for eyed. If she weren’t blonde and didn’t have those two other assets (which are impressive) she wouldn’t be nearly as popular as she is.

Stage actors don’t have to be as “hot” as television and movie actors. Also Rachel has never been sold as supposedly hot, I don’t know why people are comparing the two out of nowhere. Her talent is being good at musical theater, nobody pays her to do anything else. They really aren’t comparable people.

Rachel is a movie actress- she has played the lead female character in several movies.

Yes but most of her roles require her to sing and or dance, that is what she gets paid for, she doesn’t get paid to be hot. I want to see Rachel vocal frying on a Jeans ad as much as I want to hear Sydney Sweeney attempt to sing lead on West Side Story.

Irony is dead. How dare you criticize Sydney Sweeney’s genes/jeans ad! Let’s all pile on Rachel Ziegler for daring to play Snow White.

The witch was whiter than her.

Hah! You can stop beating the dead horse. Irony is really, truly dead now. No need to continue.

Just stating facts. That’s why the movie flopped, along with her career. It was poor woke casting. And she’s not pretty and the storyline was she’s the most beautiful in all of the land. That’s more subjective though, but she’s definitely not white as snow. Feel bad that role will haunt her for life. Sydney will always have great jeans.

LOL I guess that's the irony part? People who flaunt it with that kind of mean attitide are exactly they type people love, just love, watching get old.