Physicians Assistant yelling “HELP ME” while stealing a CitiBike ?

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Not aggressive? She wouldn’t stop touching him, and snatched his phone away from him.


She snatches his phone to prevent him from using it to scan the bike, because she is on the bike. She doesn't just randomly try to steal his phone. He is in the process of taking the bike away from her and won't let her access the QR reader, so she grabs for his phone because it's the only other way to prevent him from scanning the bike.

Not saying it's okay that she tried to grab his phone (I personally wouldn't do that) but in context it matters.

Also, she is only touching him because he's invading her space. She's on the bike and he has placed himself right next to her and is physically blocking her from the QR reader. She's touching him because she is trying to get him to move back away from the bike. He isn't actually entitled to that space, but he's taking it anyway.


I feel like I’m being gaslit.

She snatched his phone. There’s no excuse for that.

She would not stop touching him, even when it was obviously unnecessary.

She faked tears with shaking, and turned it off as soon as it was obvious it wasn’t working.

You are certainly welcome to make excuses for all of that behavior, but I’m not playing along with it.


I agree with all of this. But at the end of the day, they lied about her. She wasn’t trying to steal. They tried to snake her bike.

Why did they lie?!


This. It's very clear that he rents the bike after she is already sitting on it. She didn't try to steal it.

So why did this video ever even wind up on the internet? The guy who took it knows what actually happened, and is perpetuating a narrative that she "stole" the bike from him.

The posted this video knowing it would go viral and that she would be attacked. She's been doxed, she's on leave from work, and a bunch of people online are calling her a racist and a thief.

It's very troubling. This could happen to anyone.


She’s being doxed bc the video is showing what she did and how she is acting. If she was innocent the way DCUM seems to think she is, she wouldn’t be getting doxed.

It’s only troubling to people who act like her. So it couldn’t happened to anyone.


Are you kidding?!? You don’t need to be innocent to be doxxed. Just do something that could possibly be interpreted as racist and you’re screwed. No one waits for the full story to come out - it’s instant mobs and pitchforks. It’s the current American way.


Like the woman in Central Park? Or the woman calling the police on the 8 yr old selling lemonade? Or the woman calling the police on kids at the pool? Or the woman claiming burglary in a AIRBNB house? Or the woman claiming a black kid stole her phone? Yeah, they were innocent.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Not aggressive? She wouldn’t stop touching him, and snatched his phone away from him.


She snatches his phone to prevent him from using it to scan the bike, because she is on the bike. She doesn't just randomly try to steal his phone. He is in the process of taking the bike away from her and won't let her access the QR reader, so she grabs for his phone because it's the only other way to prevent him from scanning the bike.

Not saying it's okay that she tried to grab his phone (I personally wouldn't do that) but in context it matters.

Also, she is only touching him because he's invading her space. She's on the bike and he has placed himself right next to her and is physically blocking her from the QR reader. She's touching him because she is trying to get him to move back away from the bike. He isn't actually entitled to that space, but he's taking it anyway.


I feel like I’m being gaslit.

She snatched his phone. There’s no excuse for that.

She would not stop touching him, even when it was obviously unnecessary.

She faked tears with shaking, and turned it off as soon as it was obvious it wasn’t working.

You are certainly welcome to make excuses for all of that behavior, but I’m not playing along with it.


I agree with all of this. But at the end of the day, they lied about her. She wasn’t trying to steal. They tried to snake her bike.

Why did they lie?!


This. It's very clear that he rents the bike after she is already sitting on it. She didn't try to steal it.

So why did this video ever even wind up on the internet? The guy who took it knows what actually happened, and is perpetuating a narrative that she "stole" the bike from him.

The posted this video knowing it would go viral and that she would be attacked. She's been doxed, she's on leave from work, and a bunch of people online are calling her a racist and a thief.

It's very troubling. This could happen to anyone.


She’s being doxed bc the video is showing what she did and how she is acting. If she was innocent the way DCUM seems to think she is, she wouldn’t be getting doxed.

It’s only troubling to people who act like her. So it couldn’t happened to anyone.


Are you kidding?!? You don’t need to be innocent to be doxxed. Just do something that could possibly be interpreted as racist and you’re screwed. No one waits for the full story to come out - it’s instant mobs and pitchforks. It’s the current American way.


Like the woman in Central Park? Or the woman calling the police on the 8 yr old selling lemonade? Or the woman calling the police on kids at the pool? Or the woman claiming burglary in a AIRBNB house? Or the woman claiming a black kid stole her phone? Yeah, they were innocent.


None of what you said invalidates my comment.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Not aggressive? She wouldn’t stop touching him, and snatched his phone away from him.


She snatches his phone to prevent him from using it to scan the bike, because she is on the bike. She doesn't just randomly try to steal his phone. He is in the process of taking the bike away from her and won't let her access the QR reader, so she grabs for his phone because it's the only other way to prevent him from scanning the bike.

Not saying it's okay that she tried to grab his phone (I personally wouldn't do that) but in context it matters.

Also, she is only touching him because he's invading her space. She's on the bike and he has placed himself right next to her and is physically blocking her from the QR reader. She's touching him because she is trying to get him to move back away from the bike. He isn't actually entitled to that space, but he's taking it anyway.


I feel like I’m being gaslit.

She snatched his phone. There’s no excuse for that.

She would not stop touching him, even when it was obviously unnecessary.

She faked tears with shaking, and turned it off as soon as it was obvious it wasn’t working.

You are certainly welcome to make excuses for all of that behavior, but I’m not playing along with it.


I agree with all of this. But at the end of the day, they lied about her. She wasn’t trying to steal. They tried to snake her bike.

Why did they lie?!


This. It's very clear that he rents the bike after she is already sitting on it. She didn't try to steal it.

So why did this video ever even wind up on the internet? The guy who took it knows what actually happened, and is perpetuating a narrative that she "stole" the bike from him.

The posted this video knowing it would go viral and that she would be attacked. She's been doxed, she's on leave from work, and a bunch of people online are calling her a racist and a thief.

It's very troubling. This could happen to anyone.


She’s being doxed bc the video is showing what she did and how she is acting. If she was innocent the way DCUM seems to think she is, she wouldn’t be getting doxed.

It’s only troubling to people who act like her. So it couldn’t happened to anyone.


Are you kidding?!? You don’t need to be innocent to be doxxed. Just do something that could possibly be interpreted as racist and you’re screwed. No one waits for the full story to come out - it’s instant mobs and pitchforks. It’s the current American way.


Like the woman in Central Park? Or the woman calling the police on the 8 yr old selling lemonade? Or the woman calling the police on kids at the pool? Or the woman claiming burglary in a AIRBNB house? Or the woman claiming a black kid stole her phone? Yeah, they were innocent.


But none of those things happens in this video.

In this video, a woman is sitting on a bike preparing to rent it, while a man blocks her access to the reader. He then rents the bike while she is sitting on it. She gets upset. Within one minute, however, she gives ups the bike to him. At no point are the cops called. At no point does she accuse the man of doing anything we can't see with our own eyes that he is doing. Even when someone stops to help her, a white man who works at the same place that she does, she does not accuse these men of anything. She simply asks for help.

She has done nothing wrong.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Not aggressive? She wouldn’t stop touching him, and snatched his phone away from him.


She snatches his phone to prevent him from using it to scan the bike, because she is on the bike. She doesn't just randomly try to steal his phone. He is in the process of taking the bike away from her and won't let her access the QR reader, so she grabs for his phone because it's the only other way to prevent him from scanning the bike.

Not saying it's okay that she tried to grab his phone (I personally wouldn't do that) but in context it matters.

Also, she is only touching him because he's invading her space. She's on the bike and he has placed himself right next to her and is physically blocking her from the QR reader. She's touching him because she is trying to get him to move back away from the bike. He isn't actually entitled to that space, but he's taking it anyway.


I feel like I’m being gaslit.

She snatched his phone. There’s no excuse for that.

She would not stop touching him, even when it was obviously unnecessary.

She faked tears with shaking, and turned it off as soon as it was obvious it wasn’t working.

You are certainly welcome to make excuses for all of that behavior, but I’m not playing along with it.


I agree with all of this. But at the end of the day, they lied about her. She wasn’t trying to steal. They tried to snake her bike.

Why did they lie?!


This. It's very clear that he rents the bike after she is already sitting on it. She didn't try to steal it.

So why did this video ever even wind up on the internet? The guy who took it knows what actually happened, and is perpetuating a narrative that she "stole" the bike from him.

The posted this video knowing it would go viral and that she would be attacked. She's been doxed, she's on leave from work, and a bunch of people online are calling her a racist and a thief.

It's very troubling. This could happen to anyone.


She’s being doxed bc the video is showing what she did and how she is acting. If she was innocent the way DCUM seems to think she is, she wouldn’t be getting doxed.

It’s only troubling to people who act like her. So it couldn’t happened to anyone.


Are you kidding?!? You don’t need to be innocent to be doxxed. Just do something that could possibly be interpreted as racist and you’re screwed. No one waits for the full story to come out - it’s instant mobs and pitchforks. It’s the current American way.


Like the woman in Central Park? Or the woman calling the police on the 8 yr old selling lemonade? Or the woman calling the police on kids at the pool? Or the woman claiming burglary in a AIRBNB house? Or the woman claiming a black kid stole her phone? Yeah, they were innocent.


Yes, this is why so many of us were ready to believe the teens’ version of events. But a little critical thinking and it all falls apart.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Not aggressive? She wouldn’t stop touching him, and snatched his phone away from him.


She snatches his phone to prevent him from using it to scan the bike, because she is on the bike. She doesn't just randomly try to steal his phone. He is in the process of taking the bike away from her and won't let her access the QR reader, so she grabs for his phone because it's the only other way to prevent him from scanning the bike.

Not saying it's okay that she tried to grab his phone (I personally wouldn't do that) but in context it matters.

Also, she is only touching him because he's invading her space. She's on the bike and he has placed himself right next to her and is physically blocking her from the QR reader. She's touching him because she is trying to get him to move back away from the bike. He isn't actually entitled to that space, but he's taking it anyway.


I feel like I’m being gaslit.

She snatched his phone. There’s no excuse for that.

She would not stop touching him, even when it was obviously unnecessary.

She faked tears with shaking, and turned it off as soon as it was obvious it wasn’t working.

You are certainly welcome to make excuses for all of that behavior, but I’m not playing along with it.


I agree with all of this. But at the end of the day, they lied about her. She wasn’t trying to steal. They tried to snake her bike.

Why did they lie?!


This. It's very clear that he rents the bike after she is already sitting on it. She didn't try to steal it.

So why did this video ever even wind up on the internet? The guy who took it knows what actually happened, and is perpetuating a narrative that she "stole" the bike from him.

The posted this video knowing it would go viral and that she would be attacked. She's been doxed, she's on leave from work, and a bunch of people online are calling her a racist and a thief.

It's very troubling. This could happen to anyone.


She’s being doxed bc the video is showing what she did and how she is acting. If she was innocent the way DCUM seems to think she is, she wouldn’t be getting doxed.

It’s only troubling to people who act like her. So it couldn’t happened to anyone.


Are you kidding?!? You don’t need to be innocent to be doxxed. Just do something that could possibly be interpreted as racist and you’re screwed. No one waits for the full story to come out - it’s instant mobs and pitchforks. It’s the current American way.


Like the woman in Central Park? Or the woman calling the police on the 8 yr old selling lemonade? Or the woman calling the police on kids at the pool? Or the woman claiming burglary in a AIRBNB house? Or the woman claiming a black kid stole her phone? Yeah, they were innocent.


None of what you said invalidates my comment.


Bc you think they were innocent. Not surprising.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Not aggressive? She wouldn’t stop touching him, and snatched his phone away from him.


She snatches his phone to prevent him from using it to scan the bike, because she is on the bike. She doesn't just randomly try to steal his phone. He is in the process of taking the bike away from her and won't let her access the QR reader, so she grabs for his phone because it's the only other way to prevent him from scanning the bike.

Not saying it's okay that she tried to grab his phone (I personally wouldn't do that) but in context it matters.

Also, she is only touching him because he's invading her space. She's on the bike and he has placed himself right next to her and is physically blocking her from the QR reader. She's touching him because she is trying to get him to move back away from the bike. He isn't actually entitled to that space, but he's taking it anyway.


I feel like I’m being gaslit.

She snatched his phone. There’s no excuse for that.

She would not stop touching him, even when it was obviously unnecessary.

She faked tears with shaking, and turned it off as soon as it was obvious it wasn’t working.

You are certainly welcome to make excuses for all of that behavior, but I’m not playing along with it.


I agree with all of this. But at the end of the day, they lied about her. She wasn’t trying to steal. They tried to snake her bike.

Why did they lie?!


This. It's very clear that he rents the bike after she is already sitting on it. She didn't try to steal it.

So why did this video ever even wind up on the internet? The guy who took it knows what actually happened, and is perpetuating a narrative that she "stole" the bike from him.

The posted this video knowing it would go viral and that she would be attacked. She's been doxed, she's on leave from work, and a bunch of people online are calling her a racist and a thief.

It's very troubling. This could happen to anyone.


She’s being doxed bc the video is showing what she did and how she is acting. If she was innocent the way DCUM seems to think she is, she wouldn’t be getting doxed.

It’s only troubling to people who act like her. So it couldn’t happened to anyone.


Are you kidding?!? You don’t need to be innocent to be doxxed. Just do something that could possibly be interpreted as racist and you’re screwed. No one waits for the full story to come out - it’s instant mobs and pitchforks. It’s the current American way.


Like the woman in Central Park? Or the woman calling the police on the 8 yr old selling lemonade? Or the woman calling the police on kids at the pool? Or the woman claiming burglary in a AIRBNB house? Or the woman claiming a black kid stole her phone? Yeah, they were innocent.


None of what you said invalidates my comment.


Bc you think they were innocent. Not surprising.


Not one person has suggested that people in OTHER videos are innocent.

Many posters have calmly explained why the woman in THIS video is innocent of what she is accused of. She does not attempt to steal this bike. She does not fake cry. She does not sic the cops on these boys. She is forced off a bike she is clearly trying to rent and she does so with only a minutes worth of resistance before calmly moving on. She's not a saint, but she's done nothing wrong.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Not aggressive? She wouldn’t stop touching him, and snatched his phone away from him.


She snatches his phone to prevent him from using it to scan the bike, because she is on the bike. She doesn't just randomly try to steal his phone. He is in the process of taking the bike away from her and won't let her access the QR reader, so she grabs for his phone because it's the only other way to prevent him from scanning the bike.

Not saying it's okay that she tried to grab his phone (I personally wouldn't do that) but in context it matters.

Also, she is only touching him because he's invading her space. She's on the bike and he has placed himself right next to her and is physically blocking her from the QR reader. She's touching him because she is trying to get him to move back away from the bike. He isn't actually entitled to that space, but he's taking it anyway.


I feel like I’m being gaslit.

She snatched his phone. There’s no excuse for that.

She would not stop touching him, even when it was obviously unnecessary.

She faked tears with shaking, and turned it off as soon as it was obvious it wasn’t working.

You are certainly welcome to make excuses for all of that behavior, but I’m not playing along with it.


I agree with all of this. But at the end of the day, they lied about her. She wasn’t trying to steal. They tried to snake her bike.

Why did they lie?!


This. It's very clear that he rents the bike after she is already sitting on it. She didn't try to steal it.

So why did this video ever even wind up on the internet? The guy who took it knows what actually happened, and is perpetuating a narrative that she "stole" the bike from him.

The posted this video knowing it would go viral and that she would be attacked. She's been doxed, she's on leave from work, and a bunch of people online are calling her a racist and a thief.

It's very troubling. This could happen to anyone.


She’s being doxed bc the video is showing what she did and how she is acting. If she was innocent the way DCUM seems to think she is, she wouldn’t be getting doxed.

It’s only troubling to people who act like her. So it couldn’t happened to anyone.


Are you kidding?!? You don’t need to be innocent to be doxxed. Just do something that could possibly be interpreted as racist and you’re screwed. No one waits for the full story to come out - it’s instant mobs and pitchforks. It’s the current American way.


Like the woman in Central Park? Or the woman calling the police on the 8 yr old selling lemonade? Or the woman calling the police on kids at the pool? Or the woman claiming burglary in a AIRBNB house? Or the woman claiming a black kid stole her phone? Yeah, they were innocent.


Yes, this is why so many of us were ready to believe the teens’ version of events. But a little critical thinking and it all falls apart.


More like a lot of contorting to justify this woman as some victim.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Not aggressive? She wouldn’t stop touching him, and snatched his phone away from him.


She snatches his phone to prevent him from using it to scan the bike, because she is on the bike. She doesn't just randomly try to steal his phone. He is in the process of taking the bike away from her and won't let her access the QR reader, so she grabs for his phone because it's the only other way to prevent him from scanning the bike.

Not saying it's okay that she tried to grab his phone (I personally wouldn't do that) but in context it matters.

Also, she is only touching him because he's invading her space. She's on the bike and he has placed himself right next to her and is physically blocking her from the QR reader. She's touching him because she is trying to get him to move back away from the bike. He isn't actually entitled to that space, but he's taking it anyway.


I feel like I’m being gaslit.

She snatched his phone. There’s no excuse for that.

She would not stop touching him, even when it was obviously unnecessary.

She faked tears with shaking, and turned it off as soon as it was obvious it wasn’t working.

You are certainly welcome to make excuses for all of that behavior, but I’m not playing along with it.


I agree with all of this. But at the end of the day, they lied about her. She wasn’t trying to steal. They tried to snake her bike.

Why did they lie?!


This. It's very clear that he rents the bike after she is already sitting on it. She didn't try to steal it.

So why did this video ever even wind up on the internet? The guy who took it knows what actually happened, and is perpetuating a narrative that she "stole" the bike from him.

The posted this video knowing it would go viral and that she would be attacked. She's been doxed, she's on leave from work, and a bunch of people online are calling her a racist and a thief.

It's very troubling. This could happen to anyone.


She’s being doxed bc the video is showing what she did and how she is acting. If she was innocent the way DCUM seems to think she is, she wouldn’t be getting doxed.

It’s only troubling to people who act like her. So it couldn’t happened to anyone.


Are you kidding?!? You don’t need to be innocent to be doxxed. Just do something that could possibly be interpreted as racist and you’re screwed. No one waits for the full story to come out - it’s instant mobs and pitchforks. It’s the current American way.


Like the woman in Central Park? Or the woman calling the police on the 8 yr old selling lemonade? Or the woman calling the police on kids at the pool? Or the woman claiming burglary in a AIRBNB house? Or the woman claiming a black kid stole her phone? Yeah, they were innocent.


None of what you said invalidates my comment.


Bc you think they were innocent. Not surprising.


Not one person has suggested that people in OTHER videos are innocent.

Many posters have calmly explained why the woman in THIS video is innocent of what she is accused of. She does not attempt to steal this bike. She does not fake cry. She does not sic the cops on these boys. She is forced off a bike she is clearly trying to rent and she does so with only a minutes worth of resistance before calmly moving on. She's not a saint, but she's done nothing wrong.


The poster claimed innocent people are doxed.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Why is she fake crying, if she wants to be taken seriously?


Yes why is this victim not responding more gracefully to these bullies?


Why is that bully crying and screaming? While the victims try to calmly speak with her.


I love how mad you are. I love it.


I love how mad you are that people are questioning you. I love it.


No one is mad but you. And we all know it! The thread didn’t stay uniformly reactive and hysterical, unlike you. Poor thing.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Not aggressive? She wouldn’t stop touching him, and snatched his phone away from him.


She snatches his phone to prevent him from using it to scan the bike, because she is on the bike. She doesn't just randomly try to steal his phone. He is in the process of taking the bike away from her and won't let her access the QR reader, so she grabs for his phone because it's the only other way to prevent him from scanning the bike.

Not saying it's okay that she tried to grab his phone (I personally wouldn't do that) but in context it matters.

Also, she is only touching him because he's invading her space. She's on the bike and he has placed himself right next to her and is physically blocking her from the QR reader. She's touching him because she is trying to get him to move back away from the bike. He isn't actually entitled to that space, but he's taking it anyway.


I feel like I’m being gaslit.

She snatched his phone. There’s no excuse for that.

She would not stop touching him, even when it was obviously unnecessary.

She faked tears with shaking, and turned it off as soon as it was obvious it wasn’t working.

You are certainly welcome to make excuses for all of that behavior, but I’m not playing along with it.


I agree with all of this. But at the end of the day, they lied about her. She wasn’t trying to steal. They tried to snake her bike.

Why did they lie?!


This. It's very clear that he rents the bike after she is already sitting on it. She didn't try to steal it.

So why did this video ever even wind up on the internet? The guy who took it knows what actually happened, and is perpetuating a narrative that she "stole" the bike from him.

The posted this video knowing it would go viral and that she would be attacked. She's been doxed, she's on leave from work, and a bunch of people online are calling her a racist and a thief.

It's very troubling. This could happen to anyone.


She’s being doxed bc the video is showing what she did and how she is acting. If she was innocent the way DCUM seems to think she is, she wouldn’t be getting doxed.

It’s only troubling to people who act like her. So it couldn’t happened to anyone.


Are you kidding?!? You don’t need to be innocent to be doxxed. Just do something that could possibly be interpreted as racist and you’re screwed. No one waits for the full story to come out - it’s instant mobs and pitchforks. It’s the current American way.


Like the woman in Central Park? Or the woman calling the police on the 8 yr old selling lemonade? Or the woman calling the police on kids at the pool? Or the woman claiming burglary in a AIRBNB house? Or the woman claiming a black kid stole her phone? Yeah, they were innocent.


Yes, this is why so many of us were ready to believe the teens’ version of events. But a little critical thinking and it all falls apart.


More like a lot of contorting to justify this woman as some victim.


No contorting. The facts do not show that this woman stole a bike, accused these men of anything they didn't do, called the police, pretended that something was happening that was not, or otherwise manipulated the situation to try and get these men harmed. None of that happens on the video.

It is something that does happen, and I understand the desire for a video showing it happening. But this is not that video, and pretending it is actually does more harm than good. Because people have eyes and I can see what is happening in the video.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Not aggressive? She wouldn’t stop touching him, and snatched his phone away from him.


She snatches his phone to prevent him from using it to scan the bike, because she is on the bike. She doesn't just randomly try to steal his phone. He is in the process of taking the bike away from her and won't let her access the QR reader, so she grabs for his phone because it's the only other way to prevent him from scanning the bike.

Not saying it's okay that she tried to grab his phone (I personally wouldn't do that) but in context it matters.

Also, she is only touching him because he's invading her space. She's on the bike and he has placed himself right next to her and is physically blocking her from the QR reader. She's touching him because she is trying to get him to move back away from the bike. He isn't actually entitled to that space, but he's taking it anyway.


I feel like I’m being gaslit.

She snatched his phone. There’s no excuse for that.

She would not stop touching him, even when it was obviously unnecessary.

She faked tears with shaking, and turned it off as soon as it was obvious it wasn’t working.

You are certainly welcome to make excuses for all of that behavior, but I’m not playing along with it.


I agree with all of this. But at the end of the day, they lied about her. She wasn’t trying to steal. They tried to snake her bike.

Why did they lie?!


This. It's very clear that he rents the bike after she is already sitting on it. She didn't try to steal it.

So why did this video ever even wind up on the internet? The guy who took it knows what actually happened, and is perpetuating a narrative that she "stole" the bike from him.

The posted this video knowing it would go viral and that she would be attacked. She's been doxed, she's on leave from work, and a bunch of people online are calling her a racist and a thief.

It's very troubling. This could happen to anyone.


She’s being doxed bc the video is showing what she did and how she is acting. If she was innocent the way DCUM seems to think she is, she wouldn’t be getting doxed.

It’s only troubling to people who act like her. So it couldn’t happened to anyone.


Are you kidding?!? You don’t need to be innocent to be doxxed. Just do something that could possibly be interpreted as racist and you’re screwed. No one waits for the full story to come out - it’s instant mobs and pitchforks. It’s the current American way.


Like the woman in Central Park? Or the woman calling the police on the 8 yr old selling lemonade? Or the woman calling the police on kids at the pool? Or the woman claiming burglary in a AIRBNB house? Or the woman claiming a black kid stole her phone? Yeah, they were innocent.


Yes, this is why so many of us were ready to believe the teens’ version of events. But a little critical thinking and it all falls apart.


More like a lot of contorting to justify this woman as some victim.


So she’s a thief, or not? If she’s a thief, offer some evidence.

If she’s not a thief she IS a victim.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Not aggressive? She wouldn’t stop touching him, and snatched his phone away from him.


She snatches his phone to prevent him from using it to scan the bike, because she is on the bike. She doesn't just randomly try to steal his phone. He is in the process of taking the bike away from her and won't let her access the QR reader, so she grabs for his phone because it's the only other way to prevent him from scanning the bike.

Not saying it's okay that she tried to grab his phone (I personally wouldn't do that) but in context it matters.

Also, she is only touching him because he's invading her space. She's on the bike and he has placed himself right next to her and is physically blocking her from the QR reader. She's touching him because she is trying to get him to move back away from the bike. He isn't actually entitled to that space, but he's taking it anyway.


I feel like I’m being gaslit.

She snatched his phone. There’s no excuse for that.

She would not stop touching him, even when it was obviously unnecessary.

She faked tears with shaking, and turned it off as soon as it was obvious it wasn’t working.

You are certainly welcome to make excuses for all of that behavior, but I’m not playing along with it.


I agree with all of this. But at the end of the day, they lied about her. She wasn’t trying to steal. They tried to snake her bike.

Why did they lie?!


This. It's very clear that he rents the bike after she is already sitting on it. She didn't try to steal it.

So why did this video ever even wind up on the internet? The guy who took it knows what actually happened, and is perpetuating a narrative that she "stole" the bike from him.

The posted this video knowing it would go viral and that she would be attacked. She's been doxed, she's on leave from work, and a bunch of people online are calling her a racist and a thief.

It's very troubling. This could happen to anyone.


She’s being doxed bc the video is showing what she did and how she is acting. If she was innocent the way DCUM seems to think she is, she wouldn’t be getting doxed.

It’s only troubling to people who act like her. So it couldn’t happened to anyone.


Are you kidding?!? You don’t need to be innocent to be doxxed. Just do something that could possibly be interpreted as racist and you’re screwed. No one waits for the full story to come out - it’s instant mobs and pitchforks. It’s the current American way.


Like the woman in Central Park? Or the woman calling the police on the 8 yr old selling lemonade? Or the woman calling the police on kids at the pool? Or the woman claiming burglary in a AIRBNB house? Or the woman claiming a black kid stole her phone? Yeah, they were innocent.


None of what you said invalidates my comment.


Bc you think they were innocent. Not surprising.


Not one person has suggested that people in OTHER videos are innocent.

Many posters have calmly explained why the woman in THIS video is innocent of what she is accused of. She does not attempt to steal this bike. She does not fake cry. She does not sic the cops on these boys. She is forced off a bike she is clearly trying to rent and she does so with only a minutes worth of resistance before calmly moving on. She's not a saint, but she's done nothing wrong.


The poster claimed innocent people are doxed.


The woman in this video is innocent of what she is being accused of (she didn't steal the bike, she doesn't weaponize tears) and she has been doxxed online.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Not aggressive? She wouldn’t stop touching him, and snatched his phone away from him.


She snatches his phone to prevent him from using it to scan the bike, because she is on the bike. She doesn't just randomly try to steal his phone. He is in the process of taking the bike away from her and won't let her access the QR reader, so she grabs for his phone because it's the only other way to prevent him from scanning the bike.

Not saying it's okay that she tried to grab his phone (I personally wouldn't do that) but in context it matters.

Also, she is only touching him because he's invading her space. She's on the bike and he has placed himself right next to her and is physically blocking her from the QR reader. She's touching him because she is trying to get him to move back away from the bike. He isn't actually entitled to that space, but he's taking it anyway.


I feel like I’m being gaslit.

She snatched his phone. There’s no excuse for that.

She would not stop touching him, even when it was obviously unnecessary.

She faked tears with shaking, and turned it off as soon as it was obvious it wasn’t working.

You are certainly welcome to make excuses for all of that behavior, but I’m not playing along with it.


I agree with all of this. But at the end of the day, they lied about her. She wasn’t trying to steal. They tried to snake her bike.

Why did they lie?!


This. It's very clear that he rents the bike after she is already sitting on it. She didn't try to steal it.

So why did this video ever even wind up on the internet? The guy who took it knows what actually happened, and is perpetuating a narrative that she "stole" the bike from him.

The posted this video knowing it would go viral and that she would be attacked. She's been doxed, she's on leave from work, and a bunch of people online are calling her a racist and a thief.

It's very troubling. This could happen to anyone.


She’s being doxed bc the video is showing what she did and how she is acting. If she was innocent the way DCUM seems to think she is, she wouldn’t be getting doxed.

It’s only troubling to people who act like her. So it couldn’t happened to anyone.


Are you kidding?!? You don’t need to be innocent to be doxxed. Just do something that could possibly be interpreted as racist and you’re screwed. No one waits for the full story to come out - it’s instant mobs and pitchforks. It’s the current American way.


Like the woman in Central Park? Or the woman calling the police on the 8 yr old selling lemonade? Or the woman calling the police on kids at the pool? Or the woman claiming burglary in a AIRBNB house? Or the woman claiming a black kid stole her phone? Yeah, they were innocent.


None of what you said invalidates my comment.


Bc you think they were innocent. Not surprising.


Not one person has suggested that people in OTHER videos are innocent.

Many posters have calmly explained why the woman in THIS video is innocent of what she is accused of. She does not attempt to steal this bike. She does not fake cry. She does not sic the cops on these boys. She is forced off a bike she is clearly trying to rent and she does so with only a minutes worth of resistance before calmly moving on. She's not a saint, but she's done nothing wrong.


I actually do think she’s fake crying.

But she’s NOT stealing and they ARE trying to take a bike by preventing her from renting it.

No one is a saint here. She could have backed off sooner. But it’s not what people are saying. Very clearly not.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Not aggressive? She wouldn’t stop touching him, and snatched his phone away from him.


She snatches his phone to prevent him from using it to scan the bike, because she is on the bike. She doesn't just randomly try to steal his phone. He is in the process of taking the bike away from her and won't let her access the QR reader, so she grabs for his phone because it's the only other way to prevent him from scanning the bike.

Not saying it's okay that she tried to grab his phone (I personally wouldn't do that) but in context it matters.

Also, she is only touching him because he's invading her space. She's on the bike and he has placed himself right next to her and is physically blocking her from the QR reader. She's touching him because she is trying to get him to move back away from the bike. He isn't actually entitled to that space, but he's taking it anyway.


I feel like I’m being gaslit.

She snatched his phone. There’s no excuse for that.

She would not stop touching him, even when it was obviously unnecessary.

She faked tears with shaking, and turned it off as soon as it was obvious it wasn’t working.

You are certainly welcome to make excuses for all of that behavior, but I’m not playing along with it.


I agree with all of this. But at the end of the day, they lied about her. She wasn’t trying to steal. They tried to snake her bike.

Why did they lie?!


This. It's very clear that he rents the bike after she is already sitting on it. She didn't try to steal it.

So why did this video ever even wind up on the internet? The guy who took it knows what actually happened, and is perpetuating a narrative that she "stole" the bike from him.

The posted this video knowing it would go viral and that she would be attacked. She's been doxed, she's on leave from work, and a bunch of people online are calling her a racist and a thief.

It's very troubling. This could happen to anyone.


She’s being doxed bc the video is showing what she did and how she is acting. If she was innocent the way DCUM seems to think she is, she wouldn’t be getting doxed.

It’s only troubling to people who act like her. So it couldn’t happened to anyone.


Are you kidding?!? You don’t need to be innocent to be doxxed. Just do something that could possibly be interpreted as racist and you’re screwed. No one waits for the full story to come out - it’s instant mobs and pitchforks. It’s the current American way.


Like the woman in Central Park? Or the woman calling the police on the 8 yr old selling lemonade? Or the woman calling the police on kids at the pool? Or the woman claiming burglary in a AIRBNB house? Or the woman claiming a black kid stole her phone? Yeah, they were innocent.


None of what you said invalidates my comment.


Bc you think they were innocent. Not surprising.


Not one person has suggested that people in OTHER videos are innocent.

Many posters have calmly explained why the woman in THIS video is innocent of what she is accused of. She does not attempt to steal this bike. She does not fake cry. She does not sic the cops on these boys. She is forced off a bike she is clearly trying to rent and she does so with only a minutes worth of resistance before calmly moving on. She's not a saint, but she's done nothing wrong.


The poster claimed innocent people are doxed.


The woman in this video is innocent of what she is being accused of (she didn't steal the bike, she doesn't weaponize tears) and she has been doxxed online.


If she was innocent she wouldn’t have been doxed.
Anonymous
Why would he have to have THAT bike, in particular, if there’s already someone on it? How long could she possibly have been on it, given that she still had a bag in her hand and hadn’t gotten her phone out? You can’t even tell she’s pregnant and he didn’t do anything rough with her, so why did she claim he was hurting her fetus?
Forum Index » Off-Topic
Go to: