The Twitter Files

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Matt Taibbi admitted again this evening that they’ve only just started to review the Twitter files, which tells us they are trying to at least imply conclusions that could very well be destroyed by subsequently reviewed documents. That’s terrible journalism. Even when an outlet is publishing a multi-part investigative series, they do their full investigation before they start publishing so they know their ultimate conclusions have foundation, and then revise subsequent installments as appropriate if people come forward with new information after the earlier installments are published. Taibbi, Weiss and their team are violating pretty much every principle of responsible investigative journalism.

Taibbi has not been a responsible investigative journalist in a really long time, and Bari Weiss never has been one.

Years and years ago I remember that I used to think Taibbi was smart. Now I feel stupid that I felt that way.

He is smart. Very smart. But this, too, was a nothingburger.

[Anonymous]

Taibbi continues to embarrass himself:

[Anonymous]

Online Safety Expert Glenn Greenwald is liking this!

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Elon Musk is certainly cementing his reputation as a total effing moron.

[Anonymous]

I can’t believe Musk paid $44B for this.

[Anonymous]

Does this finally end the myth about Musk’s genius?
He is outing himself as not very bright.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Does this finally end the myth about Musk’s genius?
He is outing himself as not very bright.

The fanbois will continue to slobber over him.

[Anonymous]

Interstitial is an adjective, not a noun. You would think a writer would know that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Taibbi continues to embarrass himself:

I’m not following. Before the 2016 election, there are many Democrats on vid saying that mail ins are more prone to voter fraud. What this tweet by Hice determined to be incorrect by Twitter?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Elon Musk is certainly cementing his reputation as a total effing moron.

Again, I’m confused. Seems a lot was done behind Dorsey’s back. Dorsey was in front of Congress for Twitter’s behavior, so if his staff hid vital information from him, that’s pretty nasty.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Interstitial is an adjective, not a noun. You would think a writer would know that.

So your concern is grammar here?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Taibbi continues to embarrass himself:

I’m not following. Before the 2016 election, there are many Democrats on vid saying that mail ins are more prone to voter fraud. What this tweet by Hice determined to be incorrect by Twitter?

1) please share these examples of democratic leaders casting doubt on mail in voting because of fraud
2) please remember we were deep in a pandemic without vaccines when Hice sent his tweet.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Taibbi continues to embarrass himself:

I’m not following. Before the 2016 election, there are many Democrats on vid saying that mail ins are more prone to voter fraud. What this tweet by Hice determined to be incorrect by Twitter?

1) please share these examples of democratic leaders casting doubt on mail in voting because of fraud
2) please remember we were deep in a pandemic without vaccines when Hice sent his tweet.

1) Elizabeth Warren, Klobuchar both complained about it, as well as about machines.

2) Doesn’t matter if mail ins are prone to fraud.

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:I’m not following. Before the 2016 election, there are many Democrats on vid saying that mail ins are more prone to voter fraud. What this tweet by Hice determined to be incorrect by Twitter?

There is no evidence that mail-in ballots are more prone to fraud. If your argument is that Democrats are never wrong, I wish I shared your confidence but history has taught me otherwise.