Insurrection Hearings 6/28 and beyond

[Anonymous]

Let's not forget that Trump lied about the number of people at his inauguration. His credibility is shot.

[Anonymous]

He thought the police and military would take his side because he only talked to sycophants who would tell him the truth.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He called on an armed mob that he knew was calling for the death of the VP to march to the Capitol l, and stop the VP from certifying the election. Uhm. Not looking good.

But his supporters are intensely interested in whether he was riding around in a Ford or a Chevy.

“The whole story rests on whether or not it was a V8 or a straight eight! This is the crux of the story!!”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:And what are trumpkins’ talking points on the mafia-style threats reminding people meeting with the committee to “remain loyal”?

They didn’t watch and their propaganda dissemination outlets have not provided talking points so bleep bloop no output.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

No, it's not. They are two different vehicles.

Your fixation on what model vehicle he was using is weird. If Trump was being peddled around on a tandem bike, that wouldn't make this situation any better.

No not weird. It's a type of fallacy that Trumpers will use to discredit the whole testimony.

Apparently, the testimony is unraveling because the people she supposedly got the information from are saying it's not true.

Have they said so under oath?

Also your talking points have already dried up and blown away. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/06/28/trump-cassidy-hutchinson-jan6-hearing/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And, the plot thickens......

So that guy is going to be on Fox tomorrow saying she was lying and then go before the committee and swear to it? If he comes out publicly, the committee will have to swear him and hear him.

But if he doesn’t…. If it’s just “I know a guy who knows a guy who said she was lying…” then I’m believing the witness today.

If the committee won't allow him to testify, the writing is on the wall. Ten bucks they say something like "he testified or will testify in private". No WAY they are allowing the American people to hear it.

The only person who can claim she is lying is Tony Ornato. The person who told her the story. I'd love for them to ask him some questions and see his communications.

[Anonymous]

So vornado is probably denying he told her the story but she claims Engel was there when he told her. Wonder if Engel is getting pressure to corroborate Orbato’s denial. That would be an interesting wrinkle if he’s getting threats.


Ans yes, I’m leaving those typos because autocorrect is having fun with that name and it amuses me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Look this is not good for Meadows. He does not strike me as one to go down with the ship.

Yes, Meadows is a pussy. He will fold.

[Anonymous]

There are probably other people that know what happened. Looking forward to the trial. It’s inevitable now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Engel did speak to the committee, per this story from a couple weeks ago:

https://www.politico.com/news/2022/06/08/trump-raised-jan-6-capitol-appearance-secret-service-agent-select-panel-00038217

And said he and Trump disagreed on whether they should go to the Capitol after the speech.

Seems unlikely the committee would have had her tell that crazy-sounding tale if they didn't have corroboration from some other source.

He's allowed to go to the Capitol after a speech

He's not allowed to lead a violent mob to try to overthrow the government, genius.
At the time he was trying to go to the Capitol, the violent Trump mob had breached the Capitol.

That's speculation. He very well could have wanted to go to witness things firsthand and see if he could calm it down.

Hahahahahahaha

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He called on an armed mob that he knew was calling for the death of the VP to march to the Capitol l, and stop the VP from certifying the election. Uhm. Not looking good.

But his supporters are intensely interested in whether he was riding around in a Ford or a Chevy.

“The whole story rests on whether or not it was a V8 or a straight eight! This is the crux of the story!!”

The car that made these two, equal-length tire marks had positraction. You can't make those marks without positraction, which was not available on the '64 Buick Skylark!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

No, it's not. They are two different vehicles.

Your fixation on what model vehicle he was using is weird. If Trump was being peddled around on a tandem bike, that wouldn't make this situation any better.

No not weird. It's a type of fallacy that Trumpers will use to discredit the whole testimony.

Apparently, the testimony is unraveling because the people she supposedly got the information from are saying it's not true.

Under oath?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He called on an armed mob that he knew was calling for the death of the VP to march to the Capitol l, and stop the VP from certifying the election. Uhm. Not looking good.

But his supporters are intensely interested in whether he was riding around in a Ford or a Chevy.

“The whole story rests on whether or not it was a V8 or a straight eight! This is the crux of the story!!”

The car that made these two, equal-length tire marks had positraction. You can't make those marks without positraction, which was not available on the '64 Buick Skylark!

Omfg 😂 perfection.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And, the plot thickens......

So that guy is going to be on Fox tomorrow saying she was lying and then go before the committee and swear to it? If he comes out publicly, the committee will have to swear him and hear him.

But if he doesn’t…. If it’s just “I know a guy who knows a guy who said she was lying…” then I’m believing the witness today.

If the committee won't allow him to testify, the writing is on the wall. Ten bucks they say something like "he testified or will testify in private". No WAY they are allowing the American people to hear it.

The only person who can claim she is lying is Tony Ornato. The person who told her the story. I'd love for them to ask him some questions and see his communications.

The American people can hear it now. All he has to do is go on Fox News and say she’s lying. There is nothing illegal or keeping him from going public.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He called on an armed mob that he knew was calling for the death of the VP to march to the Capitol l, and stop the VP from certifying the election. Uhm. Not looking good.

But his supporters are intensely interested in whether he was riding around in a Ford or a Chevy.

“The whole story rests on whether or not it was a V8 or a straight eight! This is the crux of the story!!”

The car that made these two, equal-length tire marks had positraction. You can't make those marks without positraction, which was not available on the '64 Buick Skylark!

Nice.