RW vs LW news

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
He's just salty because other journos got to interview Biden before he did.

Out of the handful of reporters who interviewed Trump, Swan is the only one who managed to push back against Trump's lies. It's not surprising that Biden wants nothing to do with him.

LOL really? Because, I remember Leslie Stahl and others calling Trump out on his lies.

Try again.

Except that Stahl called him out as lying on something that turned out to be truth. Big difference.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:NY Times reporter had to correct a story about someone.
Fox News admits to repeatedly lying to its millions of viewers

Both sides can be inaccurate.

The subtlety in your post is sailing over RWNJ’s heads.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
He's just salty because other journos got to interview Biden before he did.

Out of the handful of reporters who interviewed Trump, Swan is the only one who managed to push back against Trump's lies. It's not surprising that Biden wants nothing to do with him.

LOL really? Because, I remember Leslie Stahl and others calling Trump out on his lies.

Try again.

Except that Stahl called him out as lying on something that turned out to be truth. Big difference.

Oh bullshit. Trump wasn't "spied on." And that "healthcare plan" actually was a blank book. The Trump White House later on cobbled together a bullshit 512 page collection of healthcare regs that they sent to "friendly" media like the Washington Examiner, though most of what was in it were things that happened prior to and/or in spite of his Administration. Also, they fell short, because the book they showed Leslie was much thicker than 512 pages.

Trump is just a monumental liar and RW news enabled him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
He's just salty because other journos got to interview Biden before he did.

Out of the handful of reporters who interviewed Trump, Swan is the only one who managed to push back against Trump's lies. It's not surprising that Biden wants nothing to do with him.

LOL really? Because, I remember Leslie Stahl and others calling Trump out on his lies.

Try again.

Except that Stahl called him out as lying on something that turned out to be truth. Big difference.

Ok so if that is the truth, why did Trump dismantle the State Department medical unit that was specifically detailed to monitor the activities in that Wuhan lab? You cannot have it both ways.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Unconscionable.

[Anonymous]

They want fascism installed so badly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Which outlets do you consider right-wing?
Which outlets do you consider left-wing?

Anything that isn't right wing must be left wing, especially if they try to report facts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Which outlets do you consider right-wing?
Which outlets do you consider left-wing?

Anything that isn't right wing must be left wing, especially if they try to report facts.

Seems to be the GOP take, yes, but it’s clear that the “left wing” media isn’t.

[Anonymous]

The “liberal New York Times”: Donald Trump was arrested for dozens of felonies, here’s why that’s bad for Joe Biden.

[Anonymous]

Why didn’t NBC report this itself at the time? Seems germane with all the questions swirling about old candidates and their health.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Over and over and over again. Where do they find these people?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Over and over and over again. Where do they find these people?

They find them via the local Republican Party, of course. Why do they keep doing this? Because the mainstream media is pro GOP. That’s it. That’s the deal.

[Anonymous]

J F C