Roe v Wade struck down

[Anonymous]

Louisiana could become the first state in the country to categorize mifepristone and misoprostol — the drugs used to induce an abortion — as controlled dangerous substances, threatening incarceration and fines if an individual possesses the pills without a valid prescription or outside of professional practice.

Legislators in Baton Rouge added the provision as a last-minute amendment to a Senate bill that would criminalize an abortion if someone gives a pregnant woman the pills without her consent, a scenario of “coerced criminal abortion” that nearly occurred with one senator’s sister.

A pregnant woman obtaining the two drugs “for her own consumption” would not be at risk of prosecution. But, with the exception of a health-care practitioner, a person helping her get the pills would be.

Louisiana already bans both medication and surgical abortions except to save a patient’s life or because a pregnancy is “medically futile.” Lawmakers just rejected adding exceptions for teenagers under 17 who become pregnant through rape or incest.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Louisiana could become the first state in the country to categorize mifepristone and misoprostol — the drugs used to induce an abortion — as controlled dangerous substances, threatening incarceration and fines if an individual possesses the pills without a valid prescription or outside of professional practice.

Legislators in Baton Rouge added the provision as a last-minute amendment to a Senate bill that would criminalize an abortion if someone gives a pregnant woman the pills without her consent, a scenario of “coerced criminal abortion” that nearly occurred with one senator’s sister.

A pregnant woman obtaining the two drugs “for her own consumption” would not be at risk of prosecution. But, with the exception of a health-care practitioner, a person helping her get the pills would be.

Louisiana already bans both medication and surgical abortions except to save a patient’s life or because a pregnancy is “medically futile.” Lawmakers just rejected adding exceptions for teenagers under 17 who become pregnant through rape or incest.

What makes them hate women (and girls) so much?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Louisiana could become the first state in the country to categorize mifepristone and misoprostol — the drugs used to induce an abortion — as controlled dangerous substances, threatening incarceration and fines if an individual possesses the pills without a valid prescription or outside of professional practice.

Legislators in Baton Rouge added the provision as a last-minute amendment to a Senate bill that would criminalize an abortion if someone gives a pregnant woman the pills without her consent, a scenario of “coerced criminal abortion” that nearly occurred with one senator’s sister.

A pregnant woman obtaining the two drugs “for her own consumption” would not be at risk of prosecution. But, with the exception of a health-care practitioner, a person helping her get the pills would be.

Louisiana already bans both medication and surgical abortions except to save a patient’s life or because a pregnancy is “medically futile.” Lawmakers just rejected adding exceptions for teenagers under 17 who become pregnant through rape or incest.

What makes them hate women (and girls) so much?

I write it on here a lot, but it applies, and it’s not hyperbole. Women aren’t people in the GOP. We’re made of clay and Adam’s rib. We are non entities. We are there to serve men and our children. We are not, under any circumstances, to have our own inner life or plans, especially not for our bodies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Louisiana could become the first state in the country to categorize mifepristone and misoprostol — the drugs used to induce an abortion — as controlled dangerous substances, threatening incarceration and fines if an individual possesses the pills without a valid prescription or outside of professional practice.

Legislators in Baton Rouge added the provision as a last-minute amendment to a Senate bill that would criminalize an abortion if someone gives a pregnant woman the pills without her consent, a scenario of “coerced criminal abortion” that nearly occurred with one senator’s sister.

A pregnant woman obtaining the two drugs “for her own consumption” would not be at risk of prosecution. But, with the exception of a health-care practitioner, a person helping her get the pills would be.

Louisiana already bans both medication and surgical abortions except to save a patient’s life or because a pregnancy is “medically futile.” Lawmakers just rejected adding exceptions for teenagers under 17 who become pregnant through rape or incest.

What makes them hate women (and girls) so much?

I write it on here a lot, but it applies, and it’s not hyperbole. Women aren’t people in the GOP. We’re made of clay and Adam’s rib. We are non entities. We are there to serve men and our children. We are not, under any circumstances, to have our own inner life or plans, especially not for our bodies.

It’s really important for former evangelicals to educate regular Americans on this point. It’s hard for normal people understand this, but it must be understood. The voting public has to be educated about this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Louisiana could become the first state in the country to categorize mifepristone and misoprostol — the drugs used to induce an abortion — as controlled dangerous substances, threatening incarceration and fines if an individual possesses the pills without a valid prescription or outside of professional practice.

Legislators in Baton Rouge added the provision as a last-minute amendment to a Senate bill that would criminalize an abortion if someone gives a pregnant woman the pills without her consent, a scenario of “coerced criminal abortion” that nearly occurred with one senator’s sister.

A pregnant woman obtaining the two drugs “for her own consumption” would not be at risk of prosecution. But, with the exception of a health-care practitioner, a person helping her get the pills would be.

Louisiana already bans both medication and surgical abortions except to save a patient’s life or because a pregnancy is “medically futile.” Lawmakers just rejected adding exceptions for teenagers under 17 who become pregnant through rape or incest.

What makes them hate women (and girls) so much?

I write it on here a lot, but it applies, and it’s not hyperbole. Women aren’t people in the GOP. We’re made of clay and Adam’s rib. We are non entities. We are there to serve men and our children. We are not, under any circumstances, to have our own inner life or plans, especially not for our bodies.

It’s really important for former evangelicals to educate regular Americans on this point. It’s hard for normal people understand this, but it must be understood. The voting public has to be educated about this.

There’s a reason the media isn’t focusing on this. If people understood that the evangelicals and far right are in an unholy alliance to create a fascist nation, a few million more would disavow the GOP in disgust.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Louisiana could become the first state in the country to categorize mifepristone and misoprostol — the drugs used to induce an abortion — as controlled dangerous substances, threatening incarceration and fines if an individual possesses the pills without a valid prescription or outside of professional practice.

Legislators in Baton Rouge added the provision as a last-minute amendment to a Senate bill that would criminalize an abortion if someone gives a pregnant woman the pills without her consent, a scenario of “coerced criminal abortion” that nearly occurred with one senator’s sister.

A pregnant woman obtaining the two drugs “for her own consumption” would not be at risk of prosecution. But, with the exception of a health-care practitioner, a person helping her get the pills would be.

Louisiana already bans both medication and surgical abortions except to save a patient’s life or because a pregnancy is “medically futile.” Lawmakers just rejected adding exceptions for teenagers under 17 who become pregnant through rape or incest.

What makes them hate women (and girls) so much?

I write it on here a lot, but it applies, and it’s not hyperbole. Women aren’t people in the GOP. We’re made of clay and Adam’s rib. We are non entities. We are there to serve men and our children. We are not, under any circumstances, to have our own inner life or plans, especially not for our bodies.

This exactly. Women are seen as replaceable helpmates by most evangelicals. If one dies in childbirth, you can just find another who might even be better at serving you than the first.

We aren't whole people in their eyes, and I'm saying this as a non-evangelical, progressive Christian. These evangelicals and conservatives are not people you want deciding your daughters' fates.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Louisiana could become the first state in the country to categorize mifepristone and misoprostol — the drugs used to induce an abortion — as controlled dangerous substances, threatening incarceration and fines if an individual possesses the pills without a valid prescription or outside of professional practice.

Legislators in Baton Rouge added the provision as a last-minute amendment to a Senate bill that would criminalize an abortion if someone gives a pregnant woman the pills without her consent, a scenario of “coerced criminal abortion” that nearly occurred with one senator’s sister.

A pregnant woman obtaining the two drugs “for her own consumption” would not be at risk of prosecution. But, with the exception of a health-care practitioner, a person helping her get the pills would be.

Louisiana already bans both medication and surgical abortions except to save a patient’s life or because a pregnancy is “medically futile.” Lawmakers just rejected adding exceptions for teenagers under 17 who become pregnant through rape or incest.

What makes them hate women (and girls) so much?

I write it on here a lot, but it applies, and it’s not hyperbole. Women aren’t people in the GOP. We’re made of clay and Adam’s rib. We are non entities. We are there to serve men and our children. We are not, under any circumstances, to have our own inner life or plans, especially not for our bodies.

This exactly. Women are seen as replaceable helpmates by most evangelicals. If one dies in childbirth, you can just find another who might even be better at serving you than the first.

We aren't whole people in their eyes, and I'm saying this as a non-evangelical, progressive Christian. These evangelicals and conservatives are not people you want deciding your daughters' fates.

For sure

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Louisiana could become the first state in the country to categorize mifepristone and misoprostol — the drugs used to induce an abortion — as controlled dangerous substances, threatening incarceration and fines if an individual possesses the pills without a valid prescription or outside of professional practice.

Legislators in Baton Rouge added the provision as a last-minute amendment to a Senate bill that would criminalize an abortion if someone gives a pregnant woman the pills without her consent, a scenario of “coerced criminal abortion” that nearly occurred with one senator’s sister.

A pregnant woman obtaining the two drugs “for her own consumption” would not be at risk of prosecution. But, with the exception of a health-care practitioner, a person helping her get the pills would be.

Louisiana already bans both medication and surgical abortions except to save a patient’s life or because a pregnancy is “medically futile.” Lawmakers just rejected adding exceptions for teenagers under 17 who become pregnant through rape or incest.

What makes them hate women (and girls) so much?

I write it on here a lot, but it applies, and it’s not hyperbole. Women aren’t people in the GOP. We’re made of clay and Adam’s rib. We are non entities. We are there to serve men and our children. We are not, under any circumstances, to have our own inner life or plans, especially not for our bodies.

This exactly. Women are seen as replaceable helpmates by most evangelicals. If one dies in childbirth, you can just find another who might even be better at serving you than the first.

We aren't whole people in their eyes, and I'm saying this as a non-evangelical, progressive Christian. These evangelicals and conservatives are not people you want deciding your daughters' fates.

I don’t understand how evangelical women can share these beliefs. I understand that they do, I just don’t understand why.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Louisiana could become the first state in the country to categorize mifepristone and misoprostol — the drugs used to induce an abortion — as controlled dangerous substances, threatening incarceration and fines if an individual possesses the pills without a valid prescription or outside of professional practice.

Legislators in Baton Rouge added the provision as a last-minute amendment to a Senate bill that would criminalize an abortion if someone gives a pregnant woman the pills without her consent, a scenario of “coerced criminal abortion” that nearly occurred with one senator’s sister.

A pregnant woman obtaining the two drugs “for her own consumption” would not be at risk of prosecution. But, with the exception of a health-care practitioner, a person helping her get the pills would be.

Louisiana already bans both medication and surgical abortions except to save a patient’s life or because a pregnancy is “medically futile.” Lawmakers just rejected adding exceptions for teenagers under 17 who become pregnant through rape or incest.

What makes them hate women (and girls) so much?

I write it on here a lot, but it applies, and it’s not hyperbole. Women aren’t people in the GOP. We’re made of clay and Adam’s rib. We are non entities. We are there to serve men and our children. We are not, under any circumstances, to have our own inner life or plans, especially not for our bodies.

This exactly. Women are seen as replaceable helpmates by most evangelicals. If one dies in childbirth, you can just find another who might even be better at serving you than the first.

We aren't whole people in their eyes, and I'm saying this as a non-evangelical, progressive Christian. These evangelicals and conservatives are not people you want deciding your daughters' fates.

I don’t understand how evangelical women can share these beliefs. I understand that they do, I just don’t understand why.

Imagine being told from birth that you are not a full person, that your worth lies not inherent to yourself but in your ability to serve others and to bear children.

Imagine your church, the heart of most of your experiences, driving home the point with selective (and cagily interpreted) Bible verses telling you that God thinks the same way, that women cannot know God like a man can, that you are a lesser being in all respects, that women are inherently slutty and only worthwhile so long as you don’t have intercourse outside marriage.

Imagine belonging to one of the churches that makes female victims of sexual assault apologize to the person who violated their body and soul, for “tempting” him.

Imagine literally every aspect of your life telling you you’re less. It gets internalized. I’m not saying that the culture that we all swim in is hunky dory, but it doesn’t totally erase us as people.

So that’s what a lot of conservative women are dealing with and how they approach multiple issues: that women are less and worthy of less.

[Anonymous]

Abortions are at an all time high; they will continue to happen whether Biden or Trump is elected.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Abortions are at an all time high; they will continue to happen whether Biden or Trump is elected.

More women will die if Trump is elected.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:[google]Abortions are at an all time high[b]; they will continue to happen whether Biden or Trump is elected.

Lies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:[google]Abortions are at an all time high[b]; they will continue to happen whether Biden or Trump is elected.

Lies.

90 percent uncertainty level on your chart. Nice try.

[Anonymous]

Also, the chart supposedly counts only abortions in “formal health care system”. Let’s not forget to count the number in the “informal health care system”. K?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Also, the chart supposedly counts only abortions in “formal health care system”. Let’s not forget to count the number in the “informal health care system”. K?

How many back alley abortions are happening now?

Actually maybe those are making a comeback in red states.