Epstein Files

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:When the president of the US acts like a mafia boss who exacts retribution on all who cross him, we do not have a functioning democracy. We can longer expect GOP legislators to "do the right thing." They literally live in fear of Trump and not just because he will primary them, but also because his SM criticism of them may lead to death threats or acts of violence against them or their families.

Destroying the country is preferable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope the press corp continues to ask these questions.

Not if they work for Bezos Washington Post. The WaPo just ran an article that sows doubt on the validity of the signature and provided blatant cover for MAGA. The post is all-in for Trump. They are truly shameless.

Revolting. We cancelled our sub in November after decades.

We had kept Sunday, but now we’re just done.

I’m op and just searched it in Apple News, which sometimes shows WaPo.

This truly is appalling. I have no expert analysis and the signature is his. I’ve never seen a signature less varied. From WaPo for those who can’t see it:

Is the signature Trump’s? Epstein birthday book feeds speculation.
“The Washington Post reviewed more than a dozen versions of his signatures, many of which Trump included in his book, “Letters to Trump.” Several of them do bear some resemblance to the one that is included in Epstein’s book, with a long line drawn on the final D in his first name. The signature, which reads only “Donald,” is distinct from how he signed more formal documents that included his full name, but he often used only his first name in more informal correspondence.

Several forensic analysts who reviewed the signatures said they could not determine if it was Trump’s signature.”

[Anonymous]

Sorry, I was pp not op

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/name-every-republican-voted-kill-192718920.html

Virginia Foxx said one week ago she would not do this. Then she did. I plan to call her office to ask what they’re hiding all of a sudden.

Here is the name of every Republican who voted to block the Epstein Files Transparency Act on Tuesday.

Virginia Foxx—North Carolina

Michelle Fischbach—Minnesota

Ralph Norman—South Carolina

Chip Roy—Texas

Nicholas Langworthy—New York

Austin Scott—Georgia

H. Morgan Griffith—Virginia

Brian Jack—Georgia

Thank you!!

It's just self-preservation. If they had voted for the release of the files, they would be subjected to Trump's swift and fierce revenge--personal attacks on social media followed by threats to primary them. GOP senators and representatives live under Trump's reign of terror and there's not much they can do to fight back unless they all act together. But that's never going to happen.

So they’re self-preserving over serving justice against revolting wrongs against children? That tells you everything you need to know about these MAGA/GOP folks.

Yes, they can all stand together as you said. It’s quite simple really.

[Anonymous]

I also called Winsome-Sears and left a message that I will not be donating or voting for her because of her party’s handling of the Epstein files. I’ve been getting messages asking for donations for her so hopefully this will make it stop.

https://www.virginiaredbook.com/amp/lieutenant-governor/c/0/i/22951172/winsome_sears

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope the press corp continues to ask these questions.

Not if they work for Bezos Washington Post. The WaPo just ran an article that sows doubt on the validity of the signature and provided blatant cover for MAGA. The post is all-in for Trump. They are truly shameless.

Revolting. We cancelled our sub in November after decades.

We had kept Sunday, but now we’re just done.

I’m op and just searched it in Apple News, which sometimes shows WaPo.

This truly is appalling. I have no expert analysis and the signature is his. I’ve never seen a signature less varied. From WaPo for those who can’t see it:

Is the signature Trump’s? Epstein birthday book feeds speculation.
“The Washington Post reviewed more than a dozen versions of his signatures, many of which Trump included in his book, “Letters to Trump.” Several of them do bear some resemblance to the one that is included in Epstein’s book, with a long line drawn on the final D in his first name. The signature, which reads only “Donald,” is distinct from how he signed more formal documents that included his full name, but he often used only his first name in more informal correspondence.

Several forensic analysts who reviewed the signatures said they could not determine if it was Trump’s signature.”

Baloney.
GOP MAGA
Guardian of Pedophiles
Make All Girls Available

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope the press corp continues to ask these questions.

Not if they work for Bezos Washington Post. The WaPo just ran an article that sows doubt on the validity of the signature and provided blatant cover for MAGA. The post is all-in for Trump. They are truly shameless.

Revolting. We cancelled our sub in November after decades.

We had kept Sunday, but now we’re just done.

I’m op and just searched it in Apple News, which sometimes shows WaPo.

This truly is appalling. I have no expert analysis and the signature is his. I’ve never seen a signature less varied. From WaPo for those who can’t see it:

Is the signature Trump’s? Epstein birthday book feeds speculation.
“The Washington Post reviewed more than a dozen versions of his signatures, many of which Trump included in his book, “Letters to Trump.” Several of them do bear some resemblance to the one that is included in Epstein’s book, with a long line drawn on the final D in his first name. The signature, which reads only “Donald,” is distinct from how he signed more formal documents that included his full name, but he often used only his first name in more informal correspondence.

Several forensic analysts who reviewed the signatures said they could not determine if it was Trump’s signature.”

Baloney.
GOP MAGA
Guardian of Pedophiles
Make All Girls Available

I hope this sticks and the image is forever of the MAGA voter choice:
Admit being conned
Or
Support a pedophile

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just as gross as Trump’s birthday note is the photo with the novelty check suggesting that Donald Trump bought a “depreciated” girl from Epstein for $22,500 🤮

In addition to the enigma/gamine anagram, “wonderful secret” is an anagram of “(c-word) deflowerers”. Trump is obviously too stupid to have come up with this on his own, but Ghislaine Maxwell, as the daughter of a British man with ties to the intelligence community, would have been well versed in code words. It was probably Trump and Epstein’s little inside joke.

Trump doesn’t have the mental flexibility to do an anagram even if it was explained to him at length. According to the cast of snl when he hosted he is a genuinely marginal reader. also, there is no way that dumb-f knows the word gamine.

It’s incriminating in obvious, shameless ways and implying there are also secret ways undermines our credibility.

It can be both at the same time. Even if Trump isn’t smart enough to come up with it on his own, twenty years ago he still had the mental faculties to appreciate the wink-wink once explained to him.

Both of those phrases stick out as extremely odd, too odd to be taken at face value. What does “enigmas never age” mean if not in reference to the girls?

He drew a 12 year old's breasts. There's no need to parse his words. The meaning and intent was picture clear.

Well, you’ve got people claiming it’s an adult, and that’s not his signature, and he didn’t draw it, so everything is getting parsed.

This is just additional ick from the smoking gun. Nobody is claiming it should be the main focus of anything.

[Anonymous]

Woman on IG saying she studied work of psychopaths in grad school and they often drew figures with no heads or limbs— as powerless and identity-less figures.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/name-every-republican-voted-kill-192718920.html

Virginia Foxx said one week ago she would not do this. Then she did. I plan to call her office to ask what they’re hiding all of a sudden.

Here is the name of every Republican who voted to block the Epstein Files Transparency Act on Tuesday.

Virginia Foxx—North Carolina

Michelle Fischbach—Minnesota

Ralph Norman—South Carolina

Chip Roy—Texas

Nicholas Langworthy—New York

Austin Scott—Georgia

H. Morgan Griffith—Virginia

Brian Jack—Georgia

Thank you!!

It's just self-preservation. If they had voted for the release of the files, they would be subjected to Trump's swift and fierce revenge--personal attacks on social media followed by threats to primary them. GOP senators and representatives live under Trump's reign of terror and there's not much they can do to fight back unless they all act together. But that's never going to happen.

So what? You do the right thing and roll with the punches from the loser, even if it means losing your seat. That's what it means to be a leader. Why run if you can't handle negative press?

[Anonymous]

I mean obviously it was little known wealthy financier and PE guy Dolan Frump who wrote that and signed his name, not Donald Trump. OBVIOUSLY.

[Anonymous]

GOP and MAGA tagline:
The party where wisdom, honesty and courage are PROHIBITED

[Anonymous]

Has Elon Musk chimed in yet??

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:GOP and MAGA tagline:
The party where wisdom, honesty and courage are PROHIBITED

No republicans are on the side of pedophiles.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Has Elon Musk chimed in yet??

Good question. I asked Grok that and here's the answer:

On September 8, 2025, Musk posted on X, "The more they try to cover it up, the more it will appear".

I wish he would say more if he knows something. He certainly doesn't hold back on many other issues that interest him.