racial balancing at the expense of declining talent |
You’d also have to look at composition of those classes - what % of applicants/8th graders took A1/G/A2? (We actually looked at this a few years ago, if I have time I’ll try to see if updated data is available.) Also, how well did the kids do in those classes? Were many of those A2 kids getting Cs? Did their GPA cut them from the running after the change? Even better, analyze all of this over multiple classes. |
These are not approximated…
The impact of the admissions changes: The number of Asian students enrolled at TJ by school year (fall): Aside from 2020 & 2019, there are MORE Asian students at TJ since the admissions change than any other year in the school’s history. The data shows that Asian students were accepted at a higher rate than almost all other groups, aside from Hispanic students. Asian 19% Black 14% Hispanic 21% White 17% Multiracial/Other* 13% ALL 18% So, to recap, the number of Asian students at TJ is almost at a record high. |
Admissions are a secret process for a reason. Manipulate as needed first, and cook an explanation later. |
The reason admissions processes are secret (by the way, the TJ Admissions process is WAY less opaque than it should be) is to prevent people from narrowly tailoring either their or their child's lives in pursuit of the acceptance letter. Purely objective, rubric-based admissions processes result in dangerously homogenous admit populations. At TJ in the 2010s, that manifested itself in a hyper-competitive environment where you had too many kids who were trying to achieve the same goals along the same path when multiple paths were readily available. It was a deeply unhealthy environment and eventually resulted in TJ's first instances of suicide and a huge spike in self-harm. |
Supposedly the largest beneficiaries of the changes to the race-blind process were low-income Asian families. |
That's a page straight out of race-based college admissions, which are now a thing of the past. TJ admissions is even more slimy, using SES as the cover. |
It's not "supposedly". It's confirmed in the data. One low-income Asian admit in the Class of 2024, and 51 of them in the Class of 2025. |
Asian percentage went from 74% to 53% in a year, were excluded from expanded seat quota. Racial restriction. |
Transparency is always better than opaque and subjective measures. Asians were routinely scored lower on “personality traits” by Harvard only so that admission outcomes could be engineered as desired. Harvard leveraged subjective criteria in the 1920s as well to restrict the number of Jewish students. People study to the test - whether it is TJ, SAT, LSAT or MCAT. You may get homogeneity as a result but it is way better than engineered outcomes that are not tied to merit in any way. There is a reason elite schools are returning to standardized testing. |
You must not be very familiar with the SAT. They change it every few years. It's a completely different test now that it was in the last iteration, or the one before that, or the one before that. |
I can agree with this. My child was there during the time cited here, and he was very aware of a lot of deeply unhappy fellow students. |
It's even more stressful now but on the bottom end. For an Algebra 1 student, the journey to Calc AB seems like scaling Mount Everest. What's even harder to swallow is watching over two-thirds of their peers already having scaled to twice high multivariable peak. |
What a strange worldview you have. |
Have you talked to actual students who are expressing these thoughts to you? Are you a teacher at TJ? How is it that you know so many students and where they stand in terms of class rank? |