Matt Gaetz leaving congress to be the face of Newsmax?

[Anonymous]

Ahhhhhh so “underage” is intentionally conflating legal drinking age (21) with minor / age of consent (16?) for the newest hit pieces? I’m not a Gaetz shill, I think he’s a creepy dork, but I know stat quo hit piece b.s. when I see it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Ahhhhhh so “underage” is intentionally conflating legal drinking age (21) with minor / age of consent (16?) for the newest hit pieces? I’m not a Gaetz shill, I think he’s a creepy dork, but I know stat quo hit piece b.s. when I see it.

There are charges involving a minor child. This accusation by HIS FIANCÉE’S SISTER is separate from that.

[Anonymous]

Greenberg seems very cooperative and needs more time to continue being cooperative.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Greenberg seems very cooperative and needs more time to continue being cooperative.

Literally trying to delay until the GOP can come back into power. The slow moving courts are the problem

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Greenberg seems very cooperative and needs more time to continue being cooperative.

Literally trying to delay until the GOP can come back into power. The slow moving courts are the problem

Eh, the prosecutors wouldn’t agree if he wasn’t significantly helping other investigations.

[Anonymous]

lol

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How many stories end up getting retractions or are outright unprovable months after being written by either the WaPo or NYT, then getting picked up by locals?

Not too many. They report the news and follow up if there are necessary retractions or errors.

Gaetz living in Florida doesn’t help. One of the trashiest states in the country but one of about ten states that protect teenagers until they are 18 years old. It’s illegal for a man to have sex with a 17 year old in Florida.

I don’t understand how his business associate and partner in crime was found guilty of sex with minors but Gaetz had unreliable witnesses ? Doesn’t make sense because they went on these trips together.

[Anonymous]

Even worse, he’s going to be a prime time host on OANN.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How many stories end up getting retractions or are outright unprovable months after being written by either the WaPo or NYT, then getting picked up by locals?

Not too many. They report the news and follow up if there are necessary retractions or errors.

Gaetz living in Florida doesn’t help. One of the trashiest states in the country but one of about ten states that protect teenagers until they are 18 years old. It’s illegal for a man to have sex with a 17 year old in Florida.

I don’t understand how his business associate and partner in crime was found guilty of sex with minors but Gaetz had unreliable witnesses ? Doesn’t make sense because they went on these trips together.

I thought it was because the guy through his county job had access to making fake IDs? If the girl(s) were given legitimate fake IDs showing they were college aged, how was Matt supposed to know?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How many stories end up getting retractions or are outright unprovable months after being written by either the WaPo or NYT, then getting picked up by locals?

Not too many. They report the news and follow up if there are necessary retractions or errors.

Gaetz living in Florida doesn’t help. One of the trashiest states in the country but one of about ten states that protect teenagers until they are 18 years old. It’s illegal for a man to have sex with a 17 year old in Florida.

I don’t understand how his business associate and partner in crime was found guilty of sex with minors but Gaetz had unreliable witnesses ? Doesn’t make sense because they went on these trips together.

I thought it was because the guy through his county job had access to making fake IDs? If the girl(s) were given legitimate fake IDs showing they were college aged, how was Matt supposed to know?

Um, that doesn't matter.

[Anonymous]

Any serious media outlet would not hire someone for such a prominent position when they know--in advance--that the person has been the subject of criminal and congressional probes for sex with underage women.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Any serious media outlet would not hire someone for such a prominent position when they know--in advance--that the person has been the subject of criminal and congressional probes for sex with underage women.

Any serious President wouldn’t attempt to hire someone as the Attorney General of the United States when they know all that but here we are.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Even worse, he’s going to be a prime time host on OANN.

Ok, but who's going to play Beavis?