Harris Walz interview w CNN

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’m glad Kamala refused to dignify Trump’s bigotry and idiocy with a response.

https://www.nytimes.com/live/2024/08/29/us/harris-trump-election

Harris brushes aside a question about Trump questioning her race, refusing to be drawn in.


“Same old tired playbook, next question please,” Harris said.

“That’s it?” Bash asked, to which Harris concluded, “That’s it.”

That was a classy response and a boss move. She doesn't need to get mired in his racist traps (like Obama did with Trump's birther nonsense).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Dana Bash: "You've been VP for 3 and a half years. Why didn't you do this?"

Kamala: "We brought inflation down"

She's a walking Trump ad.

+1 Correct. Still cannot believe these are our choices. For me this comes down to the economy/business acumen, the border, and past performance on the world stage. Harris/Walz seem like deer in headlights.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She fit this interview in while in Georgia campaigning. She is speaking in Savannah as I am typing this and this was the 4th or 5th stop on this run.

Savannah

They bused in the crowd from Atlanta.

Sorry Maga. There’s no evidence for that. Kamala’s running a smart ground game and people actually like her as a candidate and want to be around her. Unlike your felonious pussy grabber who most people wouldn’t want near small children.

Better buy some Woolite before prices go up again.

[Anonymous]

There is a reddit devoted to politics. It is heavily, heavily, completely liberal/progressive/democrat.

The interview must be bad because the top new stories in the sub are all Trump and Vance.

Even those complete democrat foot soldiers don’t want to talk about the interview.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Was Kamala flipping burgers at McDonalds or was she preparing the word salads?

No salads back then. She said she 'did the cashier'.

[Anonymous]

CNN obviously wants a trump win for the ratings

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trump's team wishes he could have an interview this good

This was a terrible interview. No mention of batteries or sharks. No thumbs up. ABSOLUTE FAIL!

[Anonymous]

Odd: CNN doesn’t seem to be livestreaming the interview on their site- they are making people sign in through their cable provider to watch the full interview. Why would they do that?

Odd pt. 2: CNN has not put the interview on youtube for people to watch. Why not?

Why do Americans need to sign in with a cable provider to watch the democratic candidate interview? What if someone doesn’t have cable? They can’t watch it.

Why can’t CNN post the interview on their youtube channel?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:A friend tells me "Kamala sounds like a student who only studied one hour before the test."

Your maga friend? Kamala is such a good speacher.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Odd: CNN doesn’t seem to be livestreaming the interview on their site- they are making people sign in through their cable provider to watch the full interview. Why would they do that?

Odd pt. 2: CNN has not put the interview on youtube for people to watch. Why not?

Why do Americans need to sign in with a cable provider to watch the democratic candidate interview? What if someone doesn’t have cable? They can’t watch it.

Why can’t CNN post the interview on their youtube channel?

Somebody without cable can still pay for CNN as part of various streaming packages. They are just trying to make some money, that's all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Odd: CNN doesn’t seem to be livestreaming the interview on their site- they are making people sign in through their cable provider to watch the full interview. Why would they do that?

Odd pt. 2: CNN has not put the interview on youtube for people to watch. Why not?

Why do Americans need to sign in with a cable provider to watch the democratic candidate interview? What if someone doesn’t have cable? They can’t watch it.

Why can’t CNN post the interview on their youtube channel?

Somebody without cable can still pay for CNN as part of various streaming packages. They are just trying to make some money, that's all.

So the American people have to pay CNN or a cable company to listen to the D pres candidate interview?

[Anonymous]

She did well, Tim was good too. No gimmicks but it was fine, and unlike Trump/Vance they didn't do any harm to their campaign.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Odd: CNN doesn’t seem to be livestreaming the interview on their site- they are making people sign in through their cable provider to watch the full interview. Why would they do that?

Odd pt. 2: CNN has not put the interview on youtube for people to watch. Why not?

Why do Americans need to sign in with a cable provider to watch the democratic candidate interview? What if someone doesn’t have cable? They can’t watch it.

Why can’t CNN post the interview on their youtube channel?

Somebody without cable can still pay for CNN as part of various streaming packages. They are just trying to make some money, that's all.

So the American people have to pay CNN or a cable company to listen to the D pres candidate interview?

Actually, they don't. They can use these links:
https://www.cnn.com/2024/08/30/politics/video/kamala-harris-tim-walz-full-interview-part-1-digvid
https://www.cnn.com/2024/08/30/politics/video/kamala-harris-tim-walz-full-interview-part-2-digvid
https://www.cnn.com/2024/08/30/politics/video/kamala-harris-tim-walz-full-interview-part-3-digvid

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Odd: CNN doesn’t seem to be livestreaming the interview on their site- they are making people sign in through their cable provider to watch the full interview. Why would they do that?

Odd pt. 2: CNN has not put the interview on youtube for people to watch. Why not?

Why do Americans need to sign in with a cable provider to watch the democratic candidate interview? What if someone doesn’t have cable? They can’t watch it.

Why can’t CNN post the interview on their youtube channel?

Somebody without cable can still pay for CNN as part of various streaming packages. They are just trying to make some money, that's all.

So the American people have to pay CNN or a cable company to listen to the D pres candidate interview?

Actually, they don't. They can use these links:
https://www.cnn.com/2024/08/30/politics/video/kamala-harris-tim-walz-full-interview-part-1-digvid
https://www.cnn.com/2024/08/30/politics/video/kamala-harris-tim-walz-full-interview-part-2-digvid
https://www.cnn.com/2024/08/30/politics/video/kamala-harris-tim-walz-full-interview-part-3-digvid

The combined length of these clips is 27 minutes. Not sure where OP got the "only 18 minutes"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Odd: CNN doesn’t seem to be livestreaming the interview on their site- they are making people sign in through their cable provider to watch the full interview. Why would they do that?

Odd pt. 2: CNN has not put the interview on youtube for people to watch. Why not?

Why do Americans need to sign in with a cable provider to watch the democratic candidate interview? What if someone doesn’t have cable? They can’t watch it.

Why can’t CNN post the interview on their youtube channel?

I just watched it on CNN.