ECNL moving to school year part 2

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If MLS changes from BY to SY they'll add a rule that younger players must play with their grade. This will align all teams by grade making things 1000% easier to manage.

Don't worry GY Guy they'll probably keep biobanding which will allow your kid to play down against younger players.

Oh, you mean MLS will be doing GY-lite -- that's what you're saying if you force anyone to play by grade.

Keep trying GY Guy.

Its SY 8/1-7/31 with a rule that younger players must play with their grade. Nobody is allowed to play down against players often 36 mobths younger. (This is what you want GY guy with GY Showcases)

You were called out for not being able to find anyone else pushing for GY. Try again next year but time to give up for fall 2026.

A rule saying that with SY 8/1-7/31 younger players must play with their grade can be added at any time.

Thats the thing. If a rule saying with SY younger players must play with their grade was implemented all arguements for GY get thrown out the window.

GY Guy knows this which is why hes fighting so hard against it.

I'd be more worried about private equity bringing even more ensh*tification than we already have.

USYS is already the "also ran" league for clubs. Youth Soccer is a people business a bunch of PE Analysts will drive anything they touch into the dirt trying to save costs.

Im sure ECNL is hoping that this happens because it will force clubs into their B and C tiers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If MLS changes from BY to SY they'll add a rule that younger players must play with their grade. This will align all teams by grade making things 1000% easier to manage.

Don't worry GY Guy they'll probably keep biobanding which will allow your kid to play down against younger players.

Oh, you mean MLS will be doing GY-lite -- that's what you're saying if you force anyone to play by grade.

Keep trying GY Guy.

Its SY 8/1-7/31 with a rule that younger players must play with their grade. Nobody is allowed to play down against players often 36 mobths younger. (This is what you want GY guy with GY Showcases)

You were called out for not being able to find anyone else pushing for GY. Try again next year but time to give up for fall 2026.

A rule saying that with SY 8/1-7/31 younger players must play with their grade can be added at any time.

Thats the thing. If a rule saying with SY younger players must play with their grade was implemented all arguements for GY get thrown out the window.

GY Guy knows this which is why hes fighting so hard against it.

I'd be more worried about private equity bringing even more ensh*tification than we already have.

Yeah, they were real worried about private equity. From a consumers prospective, I can see private equity solving a bunch of problems like too much stupid travel but definitely see why ECNL would feel threatened and worried about protecting events.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If MLS changes from BY to SY they'll add a rule that younger players must play with their grade. This will align all teams by grade making things 1000% easier to manage.

Don't worry GY Guy they'll probably keep biobanding which will allow your kid to play down against younger players.

Oh, you mean MLS will be doing GY-lite -- that's what you're saying if you force anyone to play by grade.

Keep trying GY Guy.

Its SY 8/1-7/31 with a rule that younger players must play with their grade. Nobody is allowed to play down against players often 36 mobths younger. (This is what you want GY guy with GY Showcases)

You were called out for not being able to find anyone else pushing for GY. Try again next year but time to give up for fall 2026.

A rule saying that with SY 8/1-7/31 younger players must play with their grade can be added at any time.

Thats the thing. If a rule saying with SY younger players must play with their grade was implemented all arguements for GY get thrown out the window.

GY Guy knows this which is why hes fighting so hard against it.

Nice parroting while ignoring the fact that you couldn't find anyone else interested in GY.

And saying nobody will be clambering for GY after GY is implemented is moronic.

GY Guy was defending and presenting how great GY Showcases would be just a couple of days ago. He might be pretending that this wasnt the case now that people are being shown how much of magnificent scam GY is. But, this is where his true feeling lie. Which means he'll be pushing for it again as soon as the heat blows over.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If MLS changes from BY to SY they'll add a rule that younger players must play with their grade. This will align all teams by grade making things 1000% easier to manage.

Don't worry GY Guy they'll probably keep biobanding which will allow your kid to play down against younger players.

Oh, you mean MLS will be doing GY-lite -- that's what you're saying if you force anyone to play by grade.

Keep trying GY Guy.

Its SY 8/1-7/31 with a rule that younger players must play with their grade. Nobody is allowed to play down against players often 36 mobths younger. (This is what you want GY guy with GY Showcases)

You were called out for not being able to find anyone else pushing for GY. Try again next year but time to give up for fall 2026.

A rule saying that with SY 8/1-7/31 younger players must play with their grade can be added at any time.

Thats the thing. If a rule saying with SY younger players must play with their grade was implemented all arguements for GY get thrown out the window.

GY Guy knows this which is why hes fighting so hard against it.

Nice parroting while ignoring the fact that you couldn't find anyone else interested in GY.

And saying nobody will be clambering for GY after GY is implemented is moronic.

GY Guy was defending and presenting how great GY Showcases would be just a couple of days ago. He might be pretending that this wasnt the case now that people are being shown how much of magnificent scam GY is. But, this is where his true feeling lie. Which means he'll be pushing for it again as soon as the heat blows over.

Can you offer a cite on your unsubstantiated accusation?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If MLS changes from BY to SY they'll add a rule that younger players must play with their grade. This will align all teams by grade making things 1000% easier to manage.

Don't worry GY Guy they'll probably keep biobanding which will allow your kid to play down against younger players.

Oh, you mean MLS will be doing GY-lite -- that's what you're saying if you force anyone to play by grade.

Keep trying GY Guy.

Its SY 8/1-7/31 with a rule that younger players must play with their grade. Nobody is allowed to play down against players often 36 mobths younger. (This is what you want GY guy with GY Showcases)

You were called out for not being able to find anyone else pushing for GY. Try again next year but time to give up for fall 2026.

A rule saying that with SY 8/1-7/31 younger players must play with their grade can be added at any time.

Thats the thing. If a rule saying with SY younger players must play with their grade was implemented all arguements for GY get thrown out the window.

GY Guy knows this which is why hes fighting so hard against it.

I'd be more worried about private equity bringing even more ensh*tification than we already have.

Yeah, they were real worried about private equity. From a consumers prospective, I can see private equity solving a bunch of problems like too much stupid travel but definitely see why ECNL would feel threatened and worried about protecting events.

Read this book. It shows what happens when Private Equity tries to get involved with Youth Soccer.

https://a.co/d/d8wqZ14

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If MLS changes from BY to SY they'll add a rule that younger players must play with their grade. This will align all teams by grade making things 1000% easier to manage.

Don't worry GY Guy they'll probably keep biobanding which will allow your kid to play down against younger players.

It will contradict what their biobanding players are doing now, playing down in the younger team that is 1/2 grade lower.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If MLS changes from BY to SY they'll add a rule that younger players must play with their grade. This will align all teams by grade making things 1000% easier to manage.

Don't worry GY Guy they'll probably keep biobanding which will allow your kid to play down against younger players.

Oh, you mean MLS will be doing GY-lite -- that's what you're saying if you force anyone to play by grade.

Keep trying GY Guy.

Its SY 8/1-7/31 with a rule that younger players must play with their grade. Nobody is allowed to play down against players often 36 mobths younger. (This is what you want GY guy with GY Showcases)

You were called out for not being able to find anyone else pushing for GY. Try again next year but time to give up for fall 2026.

A rule saying that with SY 8/1-7/31 younger players must play with their grade can be added at any time.

Thats the thing. If a rule saying with SY younger players must play with their grade was implemented all arguements for GY get thrown out the window.

GY Guy knows this which is why hes fighting so hard against it.

I'd be more worried about private equity bringing even more ensh*tification than we already have.

Yeah, they were real worried about private equity. From a consumers prospective, I can see private equity solving a bunch of problems like too much stupid travel but definitely see why ECNL would feel threatened and worried about protecting events.

Read this book. It shows what happens when Private Equity tries to get involved with Youth Soccer.

https://a.co/d/d8wqZ14

Here's another one. Its the same story about how Youth Soccer is corrupt which is why PE cant control it. For those that were around in 2016 these books provide an inside view of GPS while it blew up explaining why and how it failed. Spoiler alert everyone involved is corrupt.

https://a.co/d/4deW8vw

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If MLS changes from BY to SY they'll add a rule that younger players must play with their grade. This will align all teams by grade making things 1000% easier to manage.

Don't worry GY Guy they'll probably keep biobanding which will allow your kid to play down against younger players.

It will contradict what their biobanding players are doing now, playing down in the younger team that is 1/2 grade lower.

I agree + I dont really like biobanding either. The difference is if you're in an Academy setting biobanding down is a bad thing. This is because all acadamies want is players that can compete at a professional level at as young of an age as possible. With college recruiting all players are looking to do is stand out from other players their grade in school. This is why parents hold their kid back 1-2 years in school. They can be 36 months older than everyone else their grade. Since parents pay for Club soccer nobody wants older players playing down on their kids team.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If MLS changes from BY to SY they'll add a rule that younger players must play with their grade. This will align all teams by grade making things 1000% easier to manage.

Don't worry GY Guy they'll probably keep biobanding which will allow your kid to play down against younger players.

It will contradict what their biobanding players are doing now, playing down in the younger team that is 1/2 grade lower.

I agree + I dont really like biobanding either. The difference is if you're in an Academy setting biobanding down is a bad thing. This is because all acadamies want is players that can compete at a professional level at as young of an age as possible. With college recruiting all players are looking to do is stand out from other players their grade in school. This is why parents hold their kid back 1-2 years in school. They can be 36 months older than everyone else their grade. Since parents pay for Club soccer nobody wants older players playing down on their kids team.

Don't worry, with age-based groups, there's no chance for GY -- unless you start forcing kids to play by grade.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If MLS changes from BY to SY they'll add a rule that younger players must play with their grade. This will align all teams by grade making things 1000% easier to manage.

Don't worry GY Guy they'll probably keep biobanding which will allow your kid to play down against younger players.

It will contradict what their biobanding players are doing now, playing down in the younger team that is 1/2 grade lower.

I agree + I dont really like biobanding either. The difference is if you're in an Academy setting biobanding down is a bad thing. This is because all acadamies want is players that can compete at a professional level at as young of an age as possible. With college recruiting all players are looking to do is stand out from other players their grade in school. This is why parents hold their kid back 1-2 years in school. They can be 36 months older than everyone else their grade. Since parents pay for Club soccer nobody wants older players playing down on their kids team.

Then why do all the top European academies have biobanding which produces world class players like Kevin De Bruyne, Declan Rice, Harry Kane etc if it doesn't work and is a bad thing?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If MLS changes from BY to SY they'll add a rule that younger players must play with their grade. This will align all teams by grade making things 1000% easier to manage.

Don't worry GY Guy they'll probably keep biobanding which will allow your kid to play down against younger players.

It will contradict what their biobanding players are doing now, playing down in the younger team that is 1/2 grade lower.

I agree + I dont really like biobanding either. The difference is if you're in an Academy setting biobanding down is a bad thing. This is because all acadamies want is players that can compete at a professional level at as young of an age as possible. With college recruiting all players are looking to do is stand out from other players their grade in school. This is why parents hold their kid back 1-2 years in school. They can be 36 months older than everyone else their grade. Since parents pay for Club soccer nobody wants older players playing down on their kids team.

Don't worry, with age-based groups, there's no chance for GY -- unless you start forcing kids to play by grade.

Having an 8/1-7/31 eligibility window is good because it completely bars older players from playing down. However it allows Aug and younger birthdays to play on a grade down team. This causes all kinds of unnecessary issues for clubs and leagues. It also keeps the door open for playjng down just enough for GY proponents to keep pushing. If you add a rule that Aug and younger players must play with their grade teams its much easier for clubs to maintain groupings and it puts the final nails in coffin for GY.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If MLS changes from BY to SY they'll add a rule that younger players must play with their grade. This will align all teams by grade making things 1000% easier to manage.

Don't worry GY Guy they'll probably keep biobanding which will allow your kid to play down against younger players.

It will contradict what their biobanding players are doing now, playing down in the younger team that is 1/2 grade lower.

I agree + I dont really like biobanding either. The difference is if you're in an Academy setting biobanding down is a bad thing. This is because all acadamies want is players that can compete at a professional level at as young of an age as possible. With college recruiting all players are looking to do is stand out from other players their grade in school. This is why parents hold their kid back 1-2 years in school. They can be 36 months older than everyone else their grade. Since parents pay for Club soccer nobody wants older players playing down on their kids team.

Then why do all the top European academies have biobanding which produces world class players like Kevin De Bruyne, Declan Rice, Harry Kane etc if it doesn't work and is a bad thing?

As I said in an Academy setting biobanding is considered a bad thing. Its a last ditch effort by late developers to stay relevant. However if puberty hits and they suddenly grow 8 inches Acadamies will play that player up ASAP so they can be considered for playing pro. This is the differnce. In a non Academy setting if a player is able to play down they'll stay playing down so they can dominate and look amazing for Scouts that are looking for players that graduate a specific year.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If MLS changes from BY to SY they'll add a rule that younger players must play with their grade. This will align all teams by grade making things 1000% easier to manage.

Don't worry GY Guy they'll probably keep biobanding which will allow your kid to play down against younger players.

It will contradict what their biobanding players are doing now, playing down in the younger team that is 1/2 grade lower.

I agree + I dont really like biobanding either. The difference is if you're in an Academy setting biobanding down is a bad thing. This is because all acadamies want is players that can compete at a professional level at as young of an age as possible. With college recruiting all players are looking to do is stand out from other players their grade in school. This is why parents hold their kid back 1-2 years in school. They can be 36 months older than everyone else their grade. Since parents pay for Club soccer nobody wants older players playing down on their kids team.

Don't worry, with age-based groups, there's no chance for GY -- unless you start forcing kids to play by grade.

Having an 8/1-7/31 eligibility window is good because it completely bars older players from playing down. However it allows Aug and younger birthdays to play on a grade down team. This causes all kinds of unnecessary issues for clubs and leagues. It also keeps the door open for playjng down just enough for GY proponents to keep pushing. If you add a rule that Aug and younger players must play with their grade teams its much easier for clubs to maintain groupings and it puts the final nails in coffin for GY.

Having an 8/1-7/31 eligibility window is good because it completely bars older players from playing down. -Full stop-

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If MLS changes from BY to SY they'll add a rule that younger players must play with their grade. This will align all teams by grade making things 1000% easier to manage.

Don't worry GY Guy they'll probably keep biobanding which will allow your kid to play down against younger players.

It will contradict what their biobanding players are doing now, playing down in the younger team that is 1/2 grade lower.

I agree + I dont really like biobanding either. The difference is if you're in an Academy setting biobanding down is a bad thing. This is because all acadamies want is players that can compete at a professional level at as young of an age as possible. With college recruiting all players are looking to do is stand out from other players their grade in school. This is why parents hold their kid back 1-2 years in school. They can be 36 months older than everyone else their grade. Since parents pay for Club soccer nobody wants older players playing down on their kids team.

Then why do all the top European academies have biobanding which produces world class players like Kevin De Bruyne, Declan Rice, Harry Kane etc if it doesn't work and is a bad thing?

"top European academies" is NOT our p2p MLS club, where there's a 0% chance to play pro. Biobanding should be awarded only to talented players in a True Academy team who are short for their age, not to mediocre players who cannot play in their age group in a P2P club.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If MLS changes from BY to SY they'll add a rule that younger players must play with their grade. This will align all teams by grade making things 1000% easier to manage.

Don't worry GY Guy they'll probably keep biobanding which will allow your kid to play down against younger players.

It will contradict what their biobanding players are doing now, playing down in the younger team that is 1/2 grade lower.

I agree + I dont really like biobanding either. The difference is if you're in an Academy setting biobanding down is a bad thing. This is because all acadamies want is players that can compete at a professional level at as young of an age as possible. With college recruiting all players are looking to do is stand out from other players their grade in school. This is why parents hold their kid back 1-2 years in school. They can be 36 months older than everyone else their grade. Since parents pay for Club soccer nobody wants older players playing down on their kids team.

Don't worry, with age-based groups, there's no chance for GY -- unless you start forcing kids to play by grade.

Having an 8/1-7/31 eligibility window is good because it completely bars older players from playing down. However it allows Aug and younger birthdays to play on a grade down team. This causes all kinds of unnecessary issues for clubs and leagues. It also keeps the door open for playjng down just enough for GY proponents to keep pushing. If you add a rule that Aug and younger players must play with their grade teams its much easier for clubs to maintain groupings and it puts the final nails in coffin for GY.

Having an 8/1-7/31 eligibility window is good because it completely bars older players from playing down. -Full stop-

You forgot to clap and have bird hands when full stopping