Epstein Files

[Anonymous]

One of Fox News’ top headlines is about Clinton’s letter to Epstein but in the same article they discount Trump’s quoting the White House. Can’t have it both ways, they’re obviously both legit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:if maxwell compiled the book, why don't they just ask her if it really is Trump who wrote it?

Pro tip: Trump is who wrote it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:One of Fox News’ top headlines is about Clinton’s letter to Epstein but in the same article they discount Trump’s quoting the White House. Can’t have it both ways, they’re obviously both legit.

[Anonymous]

I can't get over the Lolita sized breasts. It is so jarring and out of the ordinary. Since the time of cave paintings, there must have be millions of doodles of naked women with breasts but I don't think I've ever seen one with child sized breasts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My husband has some random items from his dad, who was a businessman (oil leasing) starting in the early 1950s (he served with Canadian AF during WWII so that generation), retired early 1980s. Includes joke business cards and small cards with cartoons of naked women and dirty jokes. All pretty obscene but this was apparently the kind of thing men would trade/show each other over drinks while doing business. Apparently Donald just got stuck in his father's era.

You people will try to normalize absolutely anything Trump does. Yes it was common for men to draw naked women back then. But you are missing the point.

That drawing is not a woman. It is a girl.

The letter is even more disturbing than the drawing. He is pretty much admitting that they both go after young girls.

Just the fact that he had a letter in there proves he was in Epstein’s inner circle, something he has been denying.

Exactly. Honestly, I thought there were two sides to this and he liked the porn model, boob job, adults. But now it looks like Melania is a beard. Trump *is* just as focused on the underage girls.

It really casts his barging into the Miss Teen USA dressing rooms in an even worse light.

Ewww. That’s right - I had forgotten about that. Trump also owned a modeling agency, right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

They say this a sketch of a naked woman, but... it's more resemblant of a teenaged girl.

That was my thought. Not the size or placement of a mature woman’s breasts.

😦

If the FBI searched the home of a suspected serial killer and found that, it would be considered high quality evidence. I'm very disturbed by the fact that she's an armless torso. What a sick man.

Most rich women have small breasts, and teenage girls don't have curves. Regardless, I'm not sure how this is illegal anyway. Signing this? there were hundres of celebraty birthday signatures to epstein including clinton , vera wang, many others https://www.axios.com/2025/07/25/epstein-birthday-letter-book-allegations-trump-clinton

Nobody said it was illegal FFS. They’re trying to prove the connection between the felon and Epstein because he’s lying. Also, it should trouble disbelievers because the felon admits he has a lot in common with Epstein while drawing a naked torso. Us logical folks know exactly what he’s referring to and thus shows he didn’t report a crime, or worse partook in it (which this letter suggests).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Brace yourselves for more arrests in DC and elsewhere, more cruelty, more nonsense blanketing the airwaves.

They're going to want to distract and punish everyone for this.

Can’t imagine how low the
Administration is willing to go, how many more people will have their rights violated as additional files are released, and the news media, and ultimately the public, hit paydirt and what comes out is undeniable. Angry, narcissistic oligarchs don’t take well to questioning and criticism.

I’m starting to wonder if John Roberts is in the files. There is no other reason that he’s doing what he is doing to the country.

Good point. I bet you’re right.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:if maxwell compiled the book, why don't they just ask her if it really is Trump who wrote it?

Lol...Maxwell was charged with perjury and the prosecutors only dropped the charges after she was sentenced for sex trafficking. She was never trustworthy - even before Trump sent his former personal attorney to get her to "exonerate" him in exchange for getting moved to much cushier accomodations.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:if maxwell compiled the book, why don't they just ask her if it really is Trump who wrote it?

Lol...Maxwell was charged with perjury and the prosecutors only dropped the charges after she was sentenced for sex trafficking. She was never trustworthy - even before Trump sent his former personal attorney to get her to "exonerate" him in exchange for getting moved to much cushier accomodations.

At this point, Maxwell’s perjury makes it hard to trust her as a reliable witness. And since the subject is Trump, who can ease her sentence or pardon her, it seems a completely unreliable set up.

[Anonymous]

With the naked eye it appears to be a signature match. Birthday book message 2003. At that time technology was moving to advanced encrypted e-signatures. That same technology had advanced to verification of hand written signatures.

We can follow a YouTube video to do an old-as-time forgery technique using overlay material including advanced imaging, microscopy, and chemical analysis to reveal discrepancies between the layers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Brace yourselves for more arrests in DC and elsewhere, more cruelty, more nonsense blanketing the airwaves.

They're going to want to distract and punish everyone for this.

Can’t imagine how low the
Administration is willing to go, how many more people will have their rights violated as additional files are released, and the news media, and ultimately the public, hit paydirt and what comes out is undeniable. Angry, narcissistic oligarchs don’t take well to questioning and criticism.

I’m starting to wonder if John Roberts is in the files. There is no other reason that he’s doing what he is doing to the country.

Good point. I bet you’re right.

I’ve also thought about a SC link. I don’t see Roberts being involved in something like this though. Maybe someone else.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:With the naked eye it appears to be a signature match. Birthday book message 2003. At that time technology was moving to advanced encrypted e-signatures. That same technology had advanced to verification of hand written signatures.

We can follow a YouTube video to do an old-as-time forgery technique using overlay material including advanced imaging, microscopy, and chemical analysis to reveal discrepancies between the layers.

People didn't use "advanced encrypted e-signatures" in 2003.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

They say this a sketch of a naked woman, but... it's more resemblant of a teenaged girl.

That was my thought. Not the size or placement of a mature woman’s breasts.

😦

If the FBI searched the home of a suspected serial killer and found that, it would be considered high quality evidence. I'm very disturbed by the fact that she's an armless torso. What a sick man.

Most rich women have small breasts, and teenage girls don't have curves. Regardless, I'm not sure how this is illegal anyway. Signing this? there were hundres of celebraty birthday signatures to epstein including clinton , vera wang, many others https://www.axios.com/2025/07/25/epstein-birthday-letter-book-allegations-trump-clinton

Nobody said it was illegal FFS. They’re trying to prove the connection between the felon and Epstein because he’s lying. Also, it should trouble disbelievers because the felon admits he has a lot in common with Epstein while drawing a naked torso. Us logical folks know exactly what he’s referring to and thus shows he didn’t report a crime, or worse partook in it (which this letter suggests).

At a minimum, Trump was aware of Epstein's proclivities and not only did nothing about it, but joked and participated in the social-ness around it. at worse, he partook in it as well. There are valid allegations of it, but not proven in a court of law.

The other thing, the other drawings in the book and poems etc that are coming out are absolutely horrific. these are simply terrible human beings.

[Anonymous]

Ok, if someone were to do a forgery, wouldn't they make the note much more incriminating?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Ok, if someone were to do a forgery, wouldn't they make the note much more incriminating?

…and why would they plant evidence years and years ago?

That whole line of thinking is even more ridiculous than the informant lie.