APS and new healthcare provider

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It was handled poorly and employees can’t do anything about it. We got an apology. That’s it.


Or, APS handled it as any employer would and employees are just mad.
Or, something in the middle. Maybe APS made some sort of deliberate or unintended mistake to exclude Kaiser, maybe they didn't. But the teacher's representative group AEA should have been aware contract was expiring and there's always a chance of changes.
I will agree that holding all the sessions about the insurance/whatever it is the teachers need to do during the school day is ludicrous, thoughtless, and serves Syphax employees' schedules rather than teachers.


There are, as I see it, three possibilities:
1) APS excluded Kaiser by accident (i.e. wrote the RFP in such a way that Kaiser can't or wouldn't bid), and upon realizing their mistake, chose to just go forward and force everyone else to live with it with the absolute bare minimum notice.
2) APS excluded Kaiser due to some misplaced sense of priorities (such as fewer providers means processing fewer payments, less back-end paperwork). That would mean APS places a lower value on keeping the health benefits of 50% of its workforce than on an opportunity to reduce its own administrative burden. In this scenario, APS also didn't feel the need to let anyone know it made this choice until the last possible moment.
3) Kaiser chose not to participate despite APS offering ostensibly reasonable terms it had offered in years past (seems pretty unlikely given that Kaiser is generally one of the more affordable and centralized providers, but we can entertain it as a possibility). In this case APS still failed to let people know what was going on, both to get them ready, and to give them a chance to agitate for Kaiser to change its tune.

In all three scenarios waiting until the open season to let people know what happened is just an appalling management failure. In each scenario, letting things play out like they did just suggests a total clock-punching mentality on the part of Syphax, doing the bare minimum and then just shrugging if things go wrong. And now the burden of that incompetence is being borne by the people who are actually responsible for carrying out APS' mission. Considering our tax dollars go to achieving that mission, people have a right to be unhappy.

Provider changes are a part of life, and happen to lots of employers. But the way this provider change was handled is unacceptable. This is a basic function of any medium or large scale organization and they managed to screw it up. Even if they didn't screw it up (as in scenario 3), their lassitude and failure to communicate turned it into a screw up. You can't expect an organization to accomplish its mission well if it turns a basic function (negotiating providers) into a disruptive event for half its employees, and then can't be bothered to do a to help ease the disruption.

Apologies don't fix that kind of failure. People should be fired over it.


I think there's a 4th scenario: APS was looking to streamline for cost effectiveness. Which is an acceptable and prudent business practice, in and of itself.


You're describing scenario #2. If you want to trim costs, why wait until the last moment to tell people? Also Kaiser is not the most expensive option.


Is this true? In every place I have worked that offered a Kaiser option, it WAS the most expensive plan offered. And not by a little, but premiums on the order of 2x or 3x more.

That’s interesting we are other options High deductible plans? Kaiser is the cheapest premium for APS employees but it does come with limitations obviously.

High deductible is always the cheapest, but Kaiser was always the most expensive.


Does Kaiser have deductible and co-pays?

For APS? Yes to copay, no deductible Iirc


So that is probably why the premiums are higher. I wonder if you look at total cost paid by employee (premiums + deductibles + standard fees) how they compare.


To clarify-Kaiser premiums in APS were not higher than the other options. Someone else was saying Kaiser was more expensive on their plan.
Also of note the upcoming BCBS HMO option is less expensive than Kaiser, still no deductible, lower copays. I think the Rx coverage might be slightly worse but I’m not on any regular medication so I’m not sure.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Isn't he the union rep? Why are folks shocked when he fights for his members? That is kind of his job.



Exactly.


I agree that he should be encouraged to advocate his opinions.

However, I think it's hypocritical to post his commentary and discourage a discussion. The coffee offer is also so passive aggressive. Translation: You can disagree with my public comments, but not in public!


I didn't read it as people can't disagree with him, just he said upfront he isn't going to respond and get into a back and forth on social media. That's fair.



He won't respond to you but he'll ask for your $$.


I support his willingness to be a vocal advocate, but super turned off for the $$ requests.


What money requests?

His advocating for teacher pay?


He's set up some donorschoose type fundraisers to buy things for his classroom.
First one was an immediate success....therefore we all should have expected more to follow....

Oh. I don’t begrudge him that. I do think he’s attention and praise hungry and don’t like him from my (online) interactions as a staff member.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Isn't he the union rep? Why are folks shocked when he fights for his members? That is kind of his job.



Exactly.


I agree that he should be encouraged to advocate his opinions.

However, I think it's hypocritical to post his commentary and discourage a discussion. The coffee offer is also so passive aggressive. Translation: You can disagree with my public comments, but not in public!


I didn't read it as people can't disagree with him, just he said upfront he isn't going to respond and get into a back and forth on social media. That's fair.


After the nastiness during covid I think that's a smart approach.


Yep the only ppl upset about this are the crowd who truly embarrassed themselves during covid. who can forget that.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Isn't he the union rep? Why are folks shocked when he fights for his members? That is kind of his job.



Exactly.


I agree that he should be encouraged to advocate his opinions.

However, I think it's hypocritical to post his commentary and discourage a discussion. The coffee offer is also so passive aggressive. Translation: You can disagree with my public comments, but not in public!


I didn't read it as people can't disagree with him, just he said upfront he isn't going to respond and get into a back and forth on social media. That's fair.



He won't respond to you but he'll ask for your $$.


I support his willingness to be a vocal advocate, but super turned off for the $$ requests.


then i assume you are advocating for higher taxes so he doesn't have to do that?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Isn't he the union rep? Why are folks shocked when he fights for his members? That is kind of his job.



Exactly.


I agree that he should be encouraged to advocate his opinions.

However, I think it's hypocritical to post his commentary and discourage a discussion. The coffee offer is also so passive aggressive. Translation: You can disagree with my public comments, but not in public!


I didn't read it as people can't disagree with him, just he said upfront he isn't going to respond and get into a back and forth on social media. That's fair.



He won't respond to you but he'll ask for your $$.


I support his willingness to be a vocal advocate, but super turned off for the $$ requests.


What money requests?

His advocating for teacher pay?


He's set up some donorschoose type fundraisers to buy things for his classroom.
First one was an immediate success....therefore we all should have expected more to follow....


Tons of teachers do that. It’s ridiculous they need to spend their own money for some classroom supplies.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Isn't he the union rep? Why are folks shocked when he fights for his members? That is kind of his job.



Exactly.


I agree that he should be encouraged to advocate his opinions.

However, I think it's hypocritical to post his commentary and discourage a discussion. The coffee offer is also so passive aggressive. Translation: You can disagree with my public comments, but not in public!


I didn't read it as people can't disagree with him, just he said upfront he isn't going to respond and get into a back and forth on social media. That's fair.



He won't respond to you but he'll ask for your $$.


I support his willingness to be a vocal advocate, but super turned off for the $$ requests.


What money requests?

His advocating for teacher pay?


He's set up some donorschoose type fundraisers to buy things for his classroom.
First one was an immediate success....therefore we all should have expected more to follow....


Tons of teachers do that. It’s ridiculous they need to spend their own money for some classroom supplies.

What we really need is a central warehouse for things like flexible seating. FWIW, APS is quite good at providing “necessary” supplies, better than any district I’ve ever worked in
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Isn't he the union rep? Why are folks shocked when he fights for his members? That is kind of his job.



Exactly.


I agree that he should be encouraged to advocate his opinions.

However, I think it's hypocritical to post his commentary and discourage a discussion. The coffee offer is also so passive aggressive. Translation: You can disagree with my public comments, but not in public!


I didn't read it as people can't disagree with him, just he said upfront he isn't going to respond and get into a back and forth on social media. That's fair.



He won't respond to you but he'll ask for your $$.


I support his willingness to be a vocal advocate, but super turned off for the $$ requests.


What money requests?

His advocating for teacher pay?


He's set up some donorschoose type fundraisers to buy things for his classroom.
First one was an immediate success....therefore we all should have expected more to follow....


Tons of teachers do that. It’s ridiculous they need to spend their own money for some classroom supplies.


Agree. But they don't all advertise their donors choose pleas on AEM and then keep coming back for subsequent ones.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Isn't he the union rep? Why are folks shocked when he fights for his members? That is kind of his job.



Exactly.


I agree that he should be encouraged to advocate his opinions.

However, I think it's hypocritical to post his commentary and discourage a discussion. The coffee offer is also so passive aggressive. Translation: You can disagree with my public comments, but not in public!


I didn't read it as people can't disagree with him, just he said upfront he isn't going to respond and get into a back and forth on social media. That's fair.



He won't respond to you but he'll ask for your $$.


I support his willingness to be a vocal advocate, but super turned off for the $$ requests.


What money requests?

His advocating for teacher pay?


He's set up some donorschoose type fundraisers to buy things for his classroom.
First one was an immediate success....therefore we all should have expected more to follow....


Tons of teachers do that. It’s ridiculous they need to spend their own money for some classroom supplies.


Agree. But they don't all advertise their donors choose pleas on AEM and then keep coming back for subsequent ones.


so you begrudge him advertising where it's effective and has a big reach? and where it's allowed? if you don't want to contribute, don't. where is he supposed to post that would be more acceptable to you?

i bet you are also a person who opposes higher taxes so you know teachers wouldn't have to do that.
Anonymous
I hope MORE teachers post their wish lists for funding on AEM. Good way to bring attention to the lack of funding by APS.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I hope MORE teachers post their wish lists for funding on AEM. Good way to bring attention to the lack of funding by APS.


Most teachers avoid AEM because of the bat$hit crazy people there.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I hope MORE teachers post their wish lists for funding on AEM. Good way to bring attention to the lack of funding by APS.


Most teachers avoid AEM because of the bat$hit crazy people there.


The real crazies bashing the teachers are on DCUM
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I hope MORE teachers post their wish lists for funding on AEM. Good way to bring attention to the lack of funding by APS.


Most teachers avoid AEM because of the bat$hit crazy people there.


I don't blame them. Someone posted there recently complaining that people post anonymously and didn't understand why. It's because of that OP and many others who are just nasty sometimes. Not everything has to be a fight.
Anonymous
The guy on AEM advocating for the health care issue at least has real substance to his posts, whether you agree with him or not. The recent post by a teacher shaming a PTA flier for using too much black ink - that’s the stuff I can’t stand over there, even if she’s trying to highlight a resource shortage. Shaming parent volunteers to make your point shouldn’t be necessary to persuade people that teachers should be allowed to use the copy machine.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Isn't he the union rep? Why are folks shocked when he fights for his members? That is kind of his job.



Exactly.


I agree that he should be encouraged to advocate his opinions.

However, I think it's hypocritical to post his commentary and discourage a discussion. The coffee offer is also so passive aggressive. Translation: You can disagree with my public comments, but not in public!


I didn't read it as people can't disagree with him, just he said upfront he isn't going to respond and get into a back and forth on social media. That's fair.


I would prefer multiple individual teachers either post a note about their fundraisers; or they just post one list with the various things they would like instead of one teacher just seeing how far he can go. Best would be a specific site they can post their wish lists to, rather than on AEM, and just post on AEM a request to look at that site once in a while. If AEM starts getting inundated with fundraising requests, it (1) detracts from AEM as an issues-discussion and question posing forum and (2) becomes off-putting, especially to those of us who can't afford to contribute to everything all the time.


He won't respond to you but he'll ask for your $$.


I support his willingness to be a vocal advocate, but super turned off for the $$ requests.


What money requests?

His advocating for teacher pay?


He's set up some donorschoose type fundraisers to buy things for his classroom.
First one was an immediate success....therefore we all should have expected more to follow....


Tons of teachers do that. It’s ridiculous they need to spend their own money for some classroom supplies.


Agree. But they don't all advertise their donors choose pleas on AEM and then keep coming back for subsequent ones.


so you begrudge him advertising where it's effective and has a big reach? and where it's allowed? if you don't want to contribute, don't. where is he supposed to post that would be more acceptable to you?

i bet you are also a person who opposes higher taxes so you know teachers wouldn't have to do that.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Isn't he the union rep? Why are folks shocked when he fights for his members? That is kind of his job.



Exactly.


I agree that he should be encouraged to advocate his opinions.

However, I think it's hypocritical to post his commentary and discourage a discussion. The coffee offer is also so passive aggressive. Translation: You can disagree with my public comments, but not in public!


I didn't read it as people can't disagree with him, just he said upfront he isn't going to respond and get into a back and forth on social media. That's fair.



He won't respond to you but he'll ask for your $$.


I support his willingness to be a vocal advocate, but super turned off for the $$ requests.


What money requests?

His advocating for teacher pay?


He's set up some donorschoose type fundraisers to buy things for his classroom.
First one was an immediate success....therefore we all should have expected more to follow....


Tons of teachers do that. It’s ridiculous they need to spend their own money for some classroom supplies.


Agree. But they don't all advertise their donors choose pleas on AEM and then keep coming back for subsequent ones.


so you begrudge him advertising where it's effective and has a big reach? and where it's allowed? if you don't want to contribute, don't. where is he supposed to post that would be more acceptable to you?

i bet you are also a person who opposes higher taxes so you know teachers wouldn't have to do that.


I would prefer it not be one teacher posting one fundraising ask at a time and seeing how far he gets, essentially making repeated requests to the same audience; that other teachers do the same, or limit the requests one teacher can make, or better yet, have a separate website where all teachers can post their wish lists and make an occasional post on AEM to please look at that other site and consider helping out.

If AEM becomes inundated with fundraising requests, it (1) detracts from AEM being an issues-discussion and question-posing-for-information exchange and (2) becomes very off-putting, especially for those of us who are not able to contribute to everything all the time.
post reply Forum Index » VA Public Schools other than FCPS
Message Quick Reply
Go to: