Gwyneth Paltrow court case

[Anonymous]

I was just blocked for expressing a well documented, mainstream opinion, backed up by the other 2 ski/dr people.

My conclusion: you need help

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I was just blocked for expressing a well documented, mainstream opinion, backed up by the other 2 ski/dr people.

My conclusion: you need help

Are you ok?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I haven't watched the trial but I did comment up thread as an experienced skier. Were they really skiing with 6 instructors for their family? Like each person had a private instructor?

Deer Valley is posh but their arrangement is next level.

I think it was 4 instructors - one per kid. I’m surprised she wasn’t at Yellowstone, deer valley is posh as you say, but Yellowstone is posher! No riff raff there.

Maybe they wanted to ski in America. I think he is trying to scam Paltrow. When you doing risky things you have to be aware that you could be hurt. He wouldn't do this if she wasn't who she was. I hope he has to pay her lawyers.

Oh genius, not only are you dead wrong but you don’t think YS is in America?

Ok I thought you were referring to a place in France called "yellowstone" I've never skied in either place and I quickly googled it and this is what I found: https://www.tripadvisor.com/Hotel_Review-g1315378-d1889600-Reviews-Yellowstone_Ski_Lodge-Sainte_Foy_Tarentaise_Savoie_Auvergne_Rhone_Alpes.html

So of course I know that Yellowstone is a famous National park but, maybe you didn't know that there is another Yellowstone, Genius?

I wrote the original post referring to Yellowstone, I’m not the one who made the insults. It’s the Yellowstone club near big sky as others have clarified- private ski resort and the more I think about it, I’m even more surprised she didn’t go there in the first place. Technically you have to own to ski there, but she’s gwyneth, I’m sure it would have been easy for her. And just a note on the ski instructors - many of the instructors are part time and do this as a side hustle and/or to get free passes for their family. They are only required to teach for 20 days a season. The more seasoned veterans would have gotten the cushy private lessons over the newbies, who have to teach group lessons to toddlers who are barely potty trained. Instructors get paid like $20-30 an hour, but they are intensely pressured to make their clients happy at deer valley. I mean, they just hired a guy from Disney with no ski experience to run the resort- that’s how seriously they take pleasing their guests.

I am the pp. I have skied deer valley and my in-laws treated. My three old learned to ski there but it wasn't a group lesson. It was an hour private lesson. Rest of the time he played in the daycare. Why shouldn't GP ski there? How would she know an ass would ski into her and then sue her years later?

Team GP

[Anonymous]

Wow! Amazing! Pray tell, what’s the inside de cullo
evidence?

[Anonymous]

When does this trial wrap up? I think she's guilty. And her lawyers are doing her no favors.

[Anonymous]

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They both seem like clowns

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:When does this trial wrap up? I think she's guilty. And her lawyers are doing her no favors.

This is a civil trial, there is no “guilt”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think Paltrow was drunk or skiing with her ski's 18" apart - someone came up behind her maybe trying to stop but couldn't - hence the noises she heard behind her. His skis then came onto and between hers causing her to widen her stance. She then loses her balance and falls - and he trips up and goes flying to land on his chest laying head down the slope causing a concussion and rib fractures. When your skis get tangled up, the more experienced and downhill skier who is not going very fast snd is in control can fall easier and the fast moving out of control one goes flying. I'm a skier and a physician. I can picture GP's story. I've skied at DV with my 3 kids. They each had their own instructor - but I did not ski with them. I'm not sure where everyone is seeing there were 6 instructors. There were just instructors for each kid - and the instructors were watching the kids. GP didn't have or need an instructor. She has stuck to her story. He seems to be unreliable, admitting that he "often misspeaks"! I hope no one is found at fault - accidents like this can happen and no one was terribly negligent. Waste of time and money - the whole case and counter suit.

Great, since you are a physician, I’m sure you believe in ebm and believe peer reviewed literature over anecdotal evidence. Refer back to the poster who posted a link to an article that studied skier-skier collisions and concluded that the striking skier is less likely to be injured than the struck skier

https://www.injuryjournal.com/article/S0020-1383(22)00356-4/pdf

I’m also a physician and a skier, and in the case of a dispute between two skiers where one is injured and the other is not, the injured one is the one most likely struck from behind. I also have skied in deer valley with my kids and I actually live 3 miles away. The word around town is that initially the accident seemed minor. I’m sure as an experienced physician you know that sometimes people underestimate their injuries and claim they feel fine even though they are not. The ski instructor identified GP to the plaintiff as if to say, hey, lucky you, you were in a collision with a celebrity. This is why there is a clear protocol to stop, exchange information, wait for ski patrol to arrive before skiing away. The instructors should know this protocol but they are not responsible for enforcing it. Had this been followed, we would know more. There is a reason why the instructor’s scenario was animated, but GP’s was not. They probably tried, but couldn’t make it seem plausible.

You are right, it’s a waste of time now since there is no additional information beyond one witness. Had that witness been in GP’s favor, I’m sure people would have believed him, but apparently not when he is in the other guy’s favor. The only part that makes him more plausible is that he is on record telling people at the time of the accident that GP was the one who hit him.

I find it strange and upsetting that as a physician you rely so strongly on peer reviewed literature that you cannot comprehend another cause/outcome. I am thankful to not be your patient. Surely you know that ailments may present differently in different people. Women are more often misdiagnosed, and you seem to have it out for Gwyneth.

[Anonymous]

Bwahaha. I’m upset you no likely my celebrity cwush

[Anonymous]

Terry and his case are toast based on how things went today.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Terry and his case are toast based on how things went today.

+1

[Anonymous]

What happened today?!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What happened today?!

Oh he's traveled the world, doing all kinds of active things (white water rafting and so on), since the incident. Drank heavily right after the accident, scored high on narcissism and low on empathy in his neuropsych eval etc. His doc said he tends to overreport symptoms. Reiterated his daughters saying he's always been aggressive and reactive.

[Anonymous]

You sound well ozonated up there without a paddle