No, it's not "healthiest." That is nonsense. Putting sweets last on purpose creates the idea that sweet stuff is a reward and it is forbidden until other things are gone is what contributes to disordered eating. Food does not need to be eaten "in order" and actually it is better to eat sweet stuff first than later. Salads are supposed to be eaten after meals vs. before. You don't know what you are talking about. |
Yes, teachers collectively read this and decide to not work. |
Of course you do. But the other parents don't. So that's why the teacher picks apart the lunches. |
Interesting theory. Why is there a shortage of teachers in the parts of the country where obesity is endemic? |
That makes it okay? |
Yes, because teachers refuse to work until this policing lunch thing gets sorted out! |
And all those parents who really care about their child’s nutrition are just absolutely what stands between us and Nice Things. If only parents didn’t care what their kids ate the teacher crisis would be solved!!
|
The other kids need to eat too? |
|
Are you okay? |
I'm fine. Are you? Another poster seems to be unable to understand that teachers touch preschoolers' containers and food. And that it's all right. |
No one objected to teachers opening containers. You’re not okay, hope you get better. |
Low pay Crazy parents Bratty children whose parents indulge their every whim. |
Bratty kids are fine. It's the crazy parents who are driving teachers to leave. |
|
I cant help but wonder if the title were: Re:Teacher dictating which parts of son's lunch he can eat in which order? if the responses would be different. More akin to
no way hes a growing boy my son needs energy, he is in sports every day of the week its just oats and bananas! my son needs fiber for better poops! whereas because its a girl its okay to police their food. I would actually be interested to know if all of the parents who emailed her had daughters. |