Kate's New Picture

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Usually, the most logical explanation is the right one. Why do many women avoid events and or end up injured and need doctors?
Because their DH beat the crap out of them.

Yup. Clearly she has been beaten half to death. That is why she is hiding. Thank gosh you can elevate the conversation here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:SHE DOES NOT HAVE AN ED!

Agree. Sort of. If she did/does, the most likely scenario is she is very restrictive/doesn’t consume enough. No way is she abusing laxatives or doing anything ED related that would cause a need to abdominal surgery. You can’t blow hole in your intestines from passing on the biscuits.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:SHE DOES NOT HAVE AN ED!

Well that settles it! Thank you, anymous poster with zero insight into what’s going on and your head in the sand

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SHE IS IN REHAB

I'm from the UK. It's an open secret there.
Either for alcoholism (most popular) or eating disorders.
Either way, that's what has been going on and that is what has been covered up.

What do you at a rehab for eating disorders? Can’t you just eat at home?

Why didn’t you ask this legit Brit insider whether the rehab was really for heroin addiction? Or is Kate on crack? Or is it for deep conditioner and eyeliner overuse? It’s pretty crappy and princess-fantasist to not explore all possibilities.

That crack about princess fantasists stung someone hard

Can you help the poor princess fantasists though? Because gosh, it did smart. Or is it outside of your expertise, as much as you have about marriage, marketing, photoshop, the royal press, lap bands, addiction, politics, wigs, Dorothy Zbornak and Blanche Devareaux, and realpolitik?

The moderator deleting your Harry and Meghan hate posts seems to have driven you over the edge

Sweets. What I’ve written is all here, because it relates to the conversation. You’ve got some issues, best of luck with…all of that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SHE DOES NOT HAVE AN ED!

Agree. Sort of. If she did/does, the most likely scenario is she is very restrictive/doesn’t consume enough. No way is she abusing laxatives or doing anything ED related that would cause a need to abdominal surgery. You can’t blow hole in your intestines from passing on the biscuits.

actually you can and a whole lot worse

[Anonymous]

Why would anyone suspect DV?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does Kate have a “right hand man”? Someone who is a trusted resource that she relies on?

Yes, an actual man. He was posted around page 80-100

Her new smoking hot spokesperson? From Charles’s camp? Seems like a plant. And would definitely not have her trust yet. What happened to her former pr spokesperson?

He previously worked for the Queen, not Charles, I believe.

Haven't she and William shared comms staff in the past?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SHE DOES NOT HAVE AN ED!

Agree. Sort of. If she did/does, the most likely scenario is she is very restrictive/doesn’t consume enough. No way is she abusing laxatives or doing anything ED related that would cause a need to abdominal surgery. You can’t blow hole in your intestines from passing on the biscuits.

um being too restrictive with calories is also an ED.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A while back a poster mentioned something about “Russell’s Sign” (scars and callouses on the back of the fingers due to self inducing vomiting), which is in line with the Kate had surgery due to damage from a long standing eating disorder.

So I googled and found several articles over the years about Kate with bandages on her hands:

Article from 2018: https://www.cosmopolitan.com/uk/reports/a24876357/kate-middleton-plasters-hands/

Here’s another: https://www.bristolpost.co.uk/news/uk-world-news/royal-fans-ask-kate-middleton-8745973

And another from last fall:
https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1822890/princess-kate-injured-finger-bandage/amp

An ED may have been an unhealthy coping mechanism. May or may not be linked to surgery.

They are already said to live apart.

What changed?

Why did they let the doting, protective husband facade drop and why don't they seem to care that this looks negative for him and for the stability of the monarchy at a time when Charles has cancer?

I think people forget how dumb the monarchy really is. They were like this during the Diana tragedy as well. Cavalier and trying to go through life as usual while the country/world was in mourning. They don’t understand that they have to be performative at times and pretend to be emotional.

The people wanted to see Will on one knee crying in front of the hospital. Since they don’t see it, they think the royals are cruel.

People these days think people are like movie characters. They want to see the meltdowns

Right. PR/KP/BP, whoever could have said Kate’s stepping back due to “exhaustion” and 98% of people would have accepted that. The other 2% are impossible to satisfy.

Can we get back on track? This one has some legs.

I agree, and in answer to the "what changed" question, one thing that changed is Elizabeth. Now that she is out of the picture it might be harder to keep everyone in line. I mean, did Charles ever keep people in line? Wasn't William always eager to please his grandma? Of course she was the queen but it seems like was is more powerful than Charles is. Anyway, I agree that the monarchy is dumb and of course was terrible to Diana but I also think it's fair to think that Queen Elizabeth learned some lessons there than the other royals didn't.

Here's a good update/summary over the last couple pages. The one poster who talks to herself, adds Golden Girls references and sometimes dapples in fantasy, but alway obfuscation, is literally clogging up the thread.

Did you mean dabbles or dapples? It’s important to keep the writing crystalline so that your insights are understood.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SHE IS IN REHAB

I'm from the UK. It's an open secret there.
Either for alcoholism (most popular) or eating disorders.
Either way, that's what has been going on and that is what has been covered up.

What do you at a rehab for eating disorders? Can’t you just eat at home?

Why didn’t you ask this legit Brit insider whether the rehab was really for heroin addiction? Or is Kate on crack? Or is it for deep conditioner and eyeliner overuse? It’s pretty crappy and princess-fantasist to not explore all possibilities.

That crack about princess fantasists stung someone hard

Can you help the poor princess fantasists though? Because gosh, it did smart. Or is it outside of your expertise, as much as you have about marriage, marketing, photoshop, the royal press, lap bands, addiction, politics, wigs, Dorothy Zbornak and Blanche Devareaux, and realpolitik?

The moderator deleting your Harry and Meghan hate posts seems to have driven you over the edge

Sweets. What I’ve written is all here, because it relates to the conversation. You’ve got some issues, best of luck with…all of that.

This poor old lady. BRF fanaticism is all she has.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:SHE DOES NOT HAVE AN ED!

Yeah, she does. She has for years. The story about her having Crohn's disease and hyperemesis during pregnancy was a cover for her eating disorder.

Part of the fight/fallout between Harry and William was that Harry insisted on protecting his wife, and when William objected, Harry called him out for not intervening in Kate's eating disorder or protecting Kate from the media or the palace.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Usually, the most logical explanation is the right one. Why do many women avoid events and or end up injured and need doctors?
Because their DH beat the crap out of them.

Yup. Clearly she has been beaten half to death. That is why she is hiding. Thank gosh you can elevate the conversation here.

DP. How many times you post on each page? 3? 4? You can thank yourself for this thread exceeding 250 pages. Plus most of your posts are so inane they’re easily identifiable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SHE DOES NOT HAVE AN ED!

Agree. Sort of. If she did/does, the most likely scenario is she is very restrictive/doesn’t consume enough. No way is she abusing laxatives or doing anything ED related that would cause a need to abdominal surgery. You can’t blow hole in your intestines from passing on the biscuits.

actually you can and a whole lot worse

Peptic Ulcers. the bleeding is life threatening.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SHE DOES NOT HAVE AN ED!

Agree. Sort of. If she did/does, the most likely scenario is she is very restrictive/doesn’t consume enough. No way is she abusing laxatives or doing anything ED related that would cause a need to abdominal surgery. You can’t blow hole in your intestines from passing on the biscuits.

You can cause bowel ischemia from anorexia

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SHE DOES NOT HAVE AN ED!

Yeah, she does. She has for years. The story about her having Crohn's disease and hyperemesis during pregnancy was a cover for her eating disorder.

Part of the fight/fallout between Harry and William was that Harry insisted on protecting his wife, and when William objected, Harry called him out for not intervening in Kate's eating disorder or protecting Kate from the media or the palace.

Uh no. Where's that Just Stop poster when you need her?