US Capitol Breached by Trump's lunatics

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:It breaks my heart to say this, but two years later, it seems that the protesters had good reasons to protest. So much has come to light that proves them correct


F**k off, traitor.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:It breaks my heart to say this, but two years later, it seems that the protesters had good reasons to protest. So much has come to light that proves them correct


Truly you are an idiot. Trump went 0 for 60 proving the election was stolen in courts of law including cases in front of his own judges, with evidence brought by his own party. They had ZERO good reasons to attack.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:It breaks my heart to say this, but two years later, it seems that the protesters had good reasons to protest. So much has come to light that proves them correct


Don’t be silly. You don’t have a heart to break.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:It breaks my heart to say this, but two years later, it seems that the protesters had good reasons to protest. So much has come to light that proves them correct


No, they did not. And they have not won a single court case and now these traitors are going to prison. That you would even remotely say what you did in your post shows you are just as bad as they are.
Anonymous
Someone is sad that their ringleader is going to spend 18 years in prison.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:


Trevor McFadden is a Trump judge, FWIW. Even he thinks these guys are traitors.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It breaks my heart to say this, but two years later, it seems that the protesters had good reasons to protest. So much has come to light that proves them correct


F**k off, traitor.


Fascist
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It breaks my heart to say this, but two years later, it seems that the protesters had good reasons to protest. So much has come to light that proves them correct


1) they weren't protestors. They were and are paramilitary who had intent and executed a failed coup on the United States Government
2) There is not a single shred of evidence, after 65 court cases, or any voter fraud or other ballot fraud in the 2020 election
3) there is nothing that has come to light. People in Trump's orbit still conspired with people under Russia's influence; the Russians still attacked the 2016 election and yes, it appears the FBI may have overstepped in launching a full, instead of partial investigation with respect to Papadopolous.


I no longer thing #2 is true. I think there was significant interference through mail voting, and through ballot harvesting, which is ripe for fraud. I don’t believe a lot of these court cases looked at things deeply. I’ve been watching what’s going on in AZ. A court ruled that Maricopa had to allow signature verification. They refused to allow it and so far have gotten away with refusing a court order. That disturbs me. If there’s nothing to hide, then you should be willing to throw open the doors, so to speak.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It breaks my heart to say this, but two years later, it seems that the protesters had good reasons to protest. So much has come to light that proves them correct


1) they weren't protestors. They were and are paramilitary who had intent and executed a failed coup on the United States Government
2) There is not a single shred of evidence, after 65 court cases, or any voter fraud or other ballot fraud in the 2020 election
3) there is nothing that has come to light. People in Trump's orbit still conspired with people under Russia's influence; the Russians still attacked the 2016 election and yes, it appears the FBI may have overstepped in launching a full, instead of partial investigation with respect to Papadopolous.


I no longer thing #2 is true. I think there was significant interference through mail voting, and through ballot harvesting, which is ripe for fraud. I don’t believe a lot of these court cases looked at things deeply. I’ve been watching what’s going on in AZ. A court ruled that Maricopa had to allow signature verification. They refused to allow it and so far have gotten away with refusing a court order. That disturbs me. If there’s nothing to hide, then you should be willing to throw open the doors, so to speak.


Just because you believe something, it does not make it true. But of course you have the right to believe anything you want.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It breaks my heart to say this, but two years later, it seems that the protesters had good reasons to protest. So much has come to light that proves them correct

They weren’t protestors, they were trying to overthrow the government. Nothing has come to light; the GOP has always sucked and will always suck, though I admit they suck more with each passing year.


I’m very disturbed by FBI behavior, by Clinton’s behavior, and by Obama’s who knew about it. And I’m very concerned about the Biden finances. If I don’t open my mind to these things as a possibility, a lot a probability now, I’m no better than what we call insurrectionists. I consider

You can be concerned about anything you want to be concerned about, but you don’t get to overturn election results you don’t like through use of force, without any proof of a stolen election. That is insurrection. There were ample opportunities to investigate fraud with mail in ballots, yet no one has produced any evidence of fraud that altered the outcome. They tried and they couldn’t do it. Are there any instances of fraud? Yes. Was it enough to change the election results? No.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It breaks my heart to say this, but two years later, it seems that the protesters had good reasons to protest. So much has come to light that proves them correct

They weren’t protestors, they were trying to overthrow the government. Nothing has come to light; the GOP has always sucked and will always suck, though I admit they suck more with each passing year.


I’m very disturbed by FBI behavior, by Clinton’s behavior, and by Obama’s who knew about it. And I’m very concerned about the Biden finances. If I don’t open my mind to these things as a possibility, a lot a probability now, I’m no better than what we call insurrectionists. I consider


You just said that entertaining conspiracy theories is your patriotic duty. Absolute legend!

Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It breaks my heart to say this, but two years later, it seems that the protesters had good reasons to protest. So much has come to light that proves them correct

They weren’t protestors, they were trying to overthrow the government. Nothing has come to light; the GOP has always sucked and will always suck, though I admit they suck more with each passing year.


I’m very disturbed by FBI behavior, by Clinton’s behavior, and by Obama’s who knew about it. And I’m very concerned about the Biden finances. If I don’t open my mind to these things as a possibility, a lot a probability now, I’m no better than what we call insurrectionists. I consider

You can be concerned about anything you want to be concerned about, but you don’t get to overturn election results you don’t like through use of force, without any proof of a stolen election. That is insurrection. There were ample opportunities to investigate fraud with mail in ballots, yet no one has produced any evidence of fraud that altered the outcome. They tried and they couldn’t do it. Are there any instances of fraud? Yes. Was it enough to change the election results? No.


All of the documented cases I have seen were GOP voters, mostly in Florida and Pennsylvania. Oh and then there is Mark Meadows.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It breaks my heart to say this, but two years later, it seems that the protesters had good reasons to protest. So much has come to light that proves them correct

They weren’t protestors, they were trying to overthrow the government. Nothing has come to light; the GOP has always sucked and will always suck, though I admit they suck more with each passing year.


I’m very disturbed by FBI behavior, by Clinton’s behavior, and by Obama’s who knew about it. And I’m very concerned about the Biden finances. If I don’t open my mind to these things as a possibility, a lot a probability now, I’m no better than what we call insurrectionists. I consider

You can be concerned about anything you want to be concerned about, but you don’t get to overturn election results you don’t like through use of force, without any proof of a stolen election. That is insurrection. There were ample opportunities to investigate fraud with mail in ballots, yet no one has produced any evidence of fraud that altered the outcome. They tried and they couldn’t do it. Are there any instances of fraud? Yes. Was it enough to change the election results? No.


All of the documented cases I have seen were GOP voters, mostly in Florida and Pennsylvania. Oh and then there is Mark Meadows.

Ah, voter fraudster Mark Meadows, registered at what, four addresses?, brings it all full circle as he knew full well what was going to happen with the GOP’s attempt to overthrow the government.
Anonymous
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: