Post your plans if Trump is re-elected

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How could he possibly get re-elected?

Why would he not be reelected? He is so presidential.

Great pic. Thought it was an old lady at first. Nice golfer’s burn too.

That is not a sunburn. That is heavily applied makeup, applied by a vain, insecure "man".

" border="0" class="embeddedImage" />

More fake photos from democrats.

Not fake, sorry.

It is. The man who took it is “mysterious,” and none of the wire services have that photo.

Vox says Moon is "a mysterious figure," perhaps an enthusiast of the president who attends open press events at the White House, meaning he is not affiliated with the White House or is a member of the White House News Photographers Association.

"The official White House photographer is Shealah Craighead, and Moon’s photos seem to come only from open press events," Vox reports.

official press photo taken by Associated Press :

[/img] [img]

So, pp, you are posting a manipulation and claiming it’s real. You should be ashamed and aghast, but are too ignorant to feel shame.

[Anonymous]

If Trump's reelected, I'm preparing for a republican induced recession and a poor response to the coronavirus due to CDC cutbacks. And, saving money (see:recession) and preparing for the pitiful amount of social security and retirement I am eligible for to be cut back.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How could he possibly get re-elected?

Why would he not be reelected? He is so presidential.

Great pic. Thought it was an old lady at first. Nice golfer’s burn too.

That is not a sunburn. That is heavily applied makeup, applied by a vain, insecure "man".

" border="0" class="embeddedImage" />

More fake photos from democrats.

Not fake, sorry.

It is. The man who took it is “mysterious,” and none of the wire services have that photo.

Vox says Moon is "a mysterious figure," perhaps an enthusiast of the president who attends open press events at the White House, meaning he is not affiliated with the White House or is a member of the White House News Photographers Association.

"The official White House photographer is Shealah Craighead, and Moon’s photos seem to come only from open press events," Vox reports.

official press photo taken by Associated Press :

[/img] [img]

So, pp, you are posting a manipulation and claiming it’s real. You should be ashamed and aghast, but are too ignorant to feel shame.

Ask Jeff to delete the fake photos. I did.

[Anonymous]

Ok; will do.

[Anonymous]

Apparently altered photos are cool with Jeff.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Apparently altered photos are cool with Jeff.

Yes, guess so. Of course, the altered photos of Joe Biden were deleted immediately. And they were hardly altered at all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If Trump's reelected, I'm preparing for a republican induced recession and a poor response to the coronavirus due to CDC cutbacks. And, saving money (see:recession) and preparing for the pitiful amount of social security and retirement I am eligible for to be cut back.

Didn't you say "recession" back in October of 2016? Still waiting? Lets wait together for another 4 years

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:Apparently altered photos are cool with Jeff.

It is not clear to me that the photo has been altered. The same tan lines are clearly visible in the photos that you folks are using as proof that it is fake. The Vox article cited above says that the photographer has a track record of covering Trump events and was even at the post-impeachment speech/grievance session at the White House.

More to the point, it is obvious to anyone that Trump is very vain about his hair and skin color. He quite clearly uses make-up. At worst, the photo highlights that fact.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Trump's reelected, I'm preparing for a republican induced recession and a poor response to the coronavirus due to CDC cutbacks. And, saving money (see:recession) and preparing for the pitiful amount of social security and retirement I am eligible for to be cut back.

Didn't you say "recession" back in October of 2016? Still waiting? Lets wait together for another 4 years

The sky is always falling, according to liberals.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How could he possibly get re-elected?

Why would he not be reelected? He is so presidential.

Great pic. Thought it was an old lady at first. Nice golfer’s burn too.

That is not a sunburn. That is heavily applied makeup, applied by a vain, insecure "man".

More fake photos from democrats.

The bottom one looks like a still from that bigfoot video.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Trump's reelected, I'm preparing for a republican induced recession and a poor response to the coronavirus due to CDC cutbacks. And, saving money (see:recession) and preparing for the pitiful amount of social security and retirement I am eligible for to be cut back.

Didn't you say "recession" back in October of 2016? Still waiting? Lets wait together for another 4 years

The sky is always falling, according to liberals.

And 2% GDP growth is roaring to Trump supporters. Unless it's Obama's 2% growth.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Apparently altered photos are cool with Jeff.

Lol, did you think he was naturally orange?

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Apparently altered photos are cool with Jeff.

It is not clear to me that the photo has been altered. The same tan lines are clearly visible in the photos that you folks are using as proof that it is fake. The Vox article cited above says that the photographer has a track record of covering Trump events and was even at the post-impeachment speech/grievance session at the White House.

More to the point, it is obvious to anyone that Trump is very vain about his hair and skin color. He quite clearly uses make-up. At worst, the photo highlights that fact.

“News photography experts from DailyMail.com reviewed the photos of Trump that were posted to Moon's Twitter account on Friday, one in color and one in black and white.

They concluded that both had been through several steps of software editing to alter the color balance and contrast, steps that are generally considered inappropriate for news photos.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Apparently altered photos are cool with Jeff.

It is not clear to me that the photo has been altered. The same tan lines are clearly visible in the photos that you folks are using as proof that it is fake. The Vox article cited above says that the photographer has a track record of covering Trump events and was even at the post-impeachment speech/grievance session at the White House.

More to the point, it is obvious to anyone that Trump is very vain about his hair and skin color. He quite clearly uses make-up. At worst, the photo highlights that fact.

“News photography experts from DailyMail.com reviewed the photos of Trump that were posted to Moon's Twitter account on Friday, one in color and one in black and white.

They concluded that both had been through several steps of software editing to alter the color balance and contrast, steps that are generally considered inappropriate for news photos.”

DailyMail?

Changing color balance and contrast might enhance the “mask” but they wouldn’t create it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Buy more popcorn for watching the train wreck.

Organic, of course.