New Epstein thread on current charges on other powerful people that got caught in his web

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Man, based on what is being posted here, seems that there must be damning evidence against Bill Clinton.

There is likely damning evidence against a ton of people, politicians, entertainers, global leaders, who knows who else. The devil doesn’t discriminate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Man, based on what is being posted here, seems that there must be damning evidence against Bill Clinton.

Try this: fear that Trump's sordid ties to Epstein will get exposed is why the Cons have been pushing an alleged Clinton angle ever since Epstein's recent trial. But so far, nobody's come up with anything on Clinton like what's been posted above for Trump. A plane ride maybe. Otherwise, nothing close by a million miles.

If you have evidence, show it. Otherwise you sound desperate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:On an expose on Netflix about Epstein, they show a clip of Trump at his kiddie island in the Caribbean and there were girls stocked there for use starting at the age of 11. Sick. Bit, hey, Trumpeter's love this guy. This sick pedophile; the only president with 3 baby mama's, is what white's who worship this guy want. And, I know this truly goes against the evangelical southern churches I grew up in that a lot of his supporters attend.

+1. Some of the kook-aid is wearing off for some of the cult too. That bible stunt made true people of faith (no matter how judgmental otherwise) question their judgment in supporting such a man. When they hear everything else - it will seal off any support he thought he had. Everyone hates people that abuse innocent children. Certainly adults who rape and molest young girls and boys. The Catholic Church included.

[Anonymous]

If Clinton were still president, I would care. Trump is president. Epstein "died" under his watch, in a federal installation. Very questionable, at best.

Let the facts come out, no matter who it takes down. Pedophiles have no place in a society of decent people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Man, based on what is being posted here, seems that there must be damning evidence against Bill Clinton.

Try this: fear that Trump's sordid ties to Epstein will get exposed is why the Cons have been pushing an alleged Clinton angle ever since Epstein's recent trial. But so far, nobody's come up with anything on Clinton like what's been posted above for Trump. A plane ride maybe. Otherwise, nothing close by a million miles.

If you have evidence, show it. Otherwise you sound desperate.

They not only sound desperate; they are desperate. And for good reason. The trump train no longer has a train track. The ride is over.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If Clinton were still president, I would care. Trump is president. Epstein "died" under his watch, in a federal installation. Very questionable, at best.

Let the facts come out, no matter who it takes down. Pedophiles have no place in a society of decent people.

Independent here and I 100% agree. I think more Americans are prepared to have their trust shaken by the public, but the good that exists is stronger and we will recover. Cut out the rot. Cut it out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The trouble with the new federal charges against Epstein is that Barr is the ultimate gate keeper. He's conflicted in that he doesn't want his father or his fuhrer exposed. I hope the state of NY can find some charges. They must be awfully busy.

Hopefully any AUSA who was instructed to conceal evidence by main justice would refuse and quit.

If the evidence gets submitted to the court, then it's in the judge's hands to decide whether or not to unseal it. Not Barr's. Not Trump's. The judge's.

This is one reasons why Republicans want to take over the courts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The trouble with the new federal charges against Epstein is that Barr is the ultimate gate keeper. He's conflicted in that he doesn't want his father or his fuhrer exposed. I hope the state of NY can find some charges. They must be awfully busy.

Hopefully any AUSA who was instructed to conceal evidence by main justice would refuse and quit.

If the evidence gets submitted to the court, then it's in the judge's hands to decide whether or not to unseal it. Not Barr's. Not Trump's. The judge's.

This is one reasons why Republicans want to take over the courts.

If a president is found to be treasonous, are the Supreme Court appointments reversible?

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

YES!!!
https://www.cnn.com/2020/07/02/us/ghislaine-maxwell-jeffrey-epstein/index.html

[Anonymous]

No way! She is SO guilty.

[Anonymous]

I thought the FBI was full of Deep State traitors. When are Trumpers going to show up to defend Maxwell?

[Anonymous]

Waiting for the "suicide" attempt...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I thought the FBI was full of Deep State traitors. When are Trumpers going to show up to defend Maxwell?

WTF?

[Anonymous]