President Joe Biden diagnosed with prostate cancer

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He had cancer while president. The deer in headlights stare during the debate was telling. Jill Biden is something else . I reported her to a DC Adult and Elder Abuse hotline last year

This. Remember when democrats kept saying that our comments about Biden's decline was "bad faith"? Right now they are being instructed not to question that Biden had an extremely rare de novo stage 4 diagnosis despite having been extensively tested.

Because once you allow yourself to ask these questions, other questions follow. Who was making decisions? Who was using the autopen? Does this all have something to do with those weird reports that Hunter was attending random meetings in the Oval Office? Was Biden treated or not? And what did people have to gain by keeping a terminally ill, mentally incompetent man in the presidency? Who was really in charge?

Pretty sure he had this prior to 2020 election.

+1. The country was being run by nameless, unelected staff. Even the senate confirmed cabinet members appeared to be in the dark. It was a constitutional crisis the entire time.

And yet somehow they didn’t manage to run the country into a ditch in 100 days.

I’d feel much safer is Biden was still in office.

Give me 100 sick Biden’s over Trumps dented old carcass, that’s a deal I’d take any day.

[Anonymous]

demented old carcass, but dented, lumpy old carcass works too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think he knew about the cancer years ago. You have to just read between the lines of the statement:

“Last week, President Joe Biden was seen for a new finding of a prostate nodule after experiencing increasing urinary symptoms,” his personal office said in a statement. “On Friday he was diagnosed with prostate cancer, characterized by a Gleason score of 9 (Grade Group 5) with metastasis to the bone.”

It doesn’t say the cancer was “new”. Just that a “new” nodule was found. Then he was diagnosed with prostate cancer with a Gleason score of 9. But had he been diagnosed years earlier with a lower Gleason score?

I thought the same until news reported he never tested his PSA since 2014. What???

Don't believe everything you read.

They're trying to explain away "not knowing" to the cancer has spread... overnight.

The easiest answer is the correct one: they've been hiding and lying about derogatory info for a long time.

All this discussion about someone no longer potus, yet we still don’t know what Trump was hiding about his health in his first term and now. Amazing all the deflection tactics. Don’t look at the car crash happening right before you,

Biden was very clearly sundowning. Democratic Party was very clearly lying to the public and then gaslit them.

Legit questions about who was really in charge should not be drowned it by the “but but Trump”.

If we do not address this, this will set precedent.

We need to set an age max to be president. The three oldest we’ve had (Reagan, Trump, and Biden) have all had clear cognitive decline while in office. It’s crazy you can’t be a firefighter after 55 but you can have the most important job in the United States.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He had cancer while president. The deer in headlights stare during the debate was telling. Jill Biden is something else . I reported her to a DC Adult and Elder Abuse hotline last year

A lot of people with cancer continue to work moneybags

[Anonymous]

Trump is fine, you just don’t agree with his agenda. There’s a big difference.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think he knew about the cancer years ago. You have to just read between the lines of the statement:

“Last week, President Joe Biden was seen for a new finding of a prostate nodule after experiencing increasing urinary symptoms,” his personal office said in a statement. “On Friday he was diagnosed with prostate cancer, characterized by a Gleason score of 9 (Grade Group 5) with metastasis to the bone.”

It doesn’t say the cancer was “new”. Just that a “new” nodule was found. Then he was diagnosed with prostate cancer with a Gleason score of 9. But had he been diagnosed years earlier with a lower Gleason score?

I thought the same until news reported he never tested his PSA since 2014. What???

Don't believe everything you read.

They're trying to explain away "not knowing" to the cancer has spread... overnight.

The easiest answer is the correct one: they've been hiding and lying about derogatory info for a long time.

All this discussion about someone no longer potus, yet we still don’t know what Trump was hiding about his health in his first term and now. Amazing all the deflection tactics. Don’t look at the car crash happening right before you,

Biden was very clearly sundowning. Democratic Party was very clearly lying to the public and then gaslit them.

Legit questions about who was really in charge should not be drowned it by the “but but Trump”.

If we do not address this, this will set precedent.

We need to set an age max to be president. The three oldest we’ve had (Reagan, Trump, and Biden) have all had clear cognitive decline while in office. It’s crazy you can’t be a firefighter after 55 but you can have the most important job in the United States.

+1. If you can’t fly a commercial plane, let’s not give you the nuclear codes.

[Anonymous]

In other words, Ron Klain was de facto POTUS 2020-2024.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think he knew about the cancer years ago. You have to just read between the lines of the statement:

“Last week, President Joe Biden was seen for a new finding of a prostate nodule after experiencing increasing urinary symptoms,” his personal office said in a statement. “On Friday he was diagnosed with prostate cancer, characterized by a Gleason score of 9 (Grade Group 5) with metastasis to the bone.”

It doesn’t say the cancer was “new”. Just that a “new” nodule was found. Then he was diagnosed with prostate cancer with a Gleason score of 9. But had he been diagnosed years earlier with a lower Gleason score?

I thought the same until news reported he never tested his PSA since 2014. What???

Don't believe everything you read.

They're trying to explain away "not knowing" to the cancer has spread... overnight.

The easiest answer is the correct one: they've been hiding and lying about derogatory info for a long time.

All this discussion about someone no longer potus, yet we still don’t know what Trump was hiding about his health in his first term and now. Amazing all the deflection tactics. Don’t look at the car crash happening right before you,

Biden was very clearly sundowning. Democratic Party was very clearly lying to the public and then gaslit them.

Legit questions about who was really in charge should not be drowned it by the “but but Trump”.

If we do not address this, this will set precedent.

The precedent was set long ago with Ronald Reagan's declining cognition in his second term, and the way his wife and aides managed it. It was also set during Trump's first term, which preceded Biden's term, during which we witnessed WITH OUR OWN EYES AND EARS numerous examples of Trump's own decline (which continues now) and which was pointed out by a number of health care professionals. Would you like examples? I have hundreds.

Look, there’s a lot to criticize about Trump. But, he appears to be physically vigorous for a man his age. You can debate his politics, but he answers questions at length every day. People are so DONE with the Democrat gas lighting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He had cancer while president. The deer in headlights stare during the debate was telling. Jill Biden is something else . I reported her to a DC Adult and Elder Abuse hotline last year

This. Remember when democrats kept saying that our comments about Biden's decline was "bad faith"? Right now they are being instructed not to question that Biden had an extremely rare de novo stage 4 diagnosis despite having been extensively tested.

Because once you allow yourself to ask these questions, other questions follow. Who was making decisions? Who was using the autopen? Does this all have something to do with those weird reports that Hunter was attending random meetings in the Oval Office? Was Biden treated or not? And what did people have to gain by keeping a terminally ill, mentally incompetent man in the presidency? Who was really in charge?

Pretty sure he had this prior to 2020 election.

+1. The country was being run by nameless, unelected staff. Even the senate confirmed cabinet members appeared to be in the dark. It was a constitutional crisis the entire time.

And yet somehow they didn’t manage to run the country into a ditch in 100 days.

I’d feel much safer is Biden was still in office.

Give me 100 sick Biden’s over Trumps dented old carcass, that’s a deal I’d take any day.

x1000

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think he knew about the cancer years ago. You have to just read between the lines of the statement:

“Last week, President Joe Biden was seen for a new finding of a prostate nodule after experiencing increasing urinary symptoms,” his personal office said in a statement. “On Friday he was diagnosed with prostate cancer, characterized by a Gleason score of 9 (Grade Group 5) with metastasis to the bone.”

It doesn’t say the cancer was “new”. Just that a “new” nodule was found. Then he was diagnosed with prostate cancer with a Gleason score of 9. But had he been diagnosed years earlier with a lower Gleason score?

I thought the same until news reported he never tested his PSA since 2014. What???

Don't believe everything you read.

They're trying to explain away "not knowing" to the cancer has spread... overnight.

The easiest answer is the correct one: they've been hiding and lying about derogatory info for a long time.

All this discussion about someone no longer potus, yet we still don’t know what Trump was hiding about his health in his first term and now. Amazing all the deflection tactics. Don’t look at the car crash happening right before you,

Biden was very clearly sundowning. Democratic Party was very clearly lying to the public and then gaslit them.

Legit questions about who was really in charge should not be drowned it by the “but but Trump”.

If we do not address this, this will set precedent.

The precedent was set long ago with Ronald Reagan's declining cognition in his second term, and the way his wife and aides managed it. It was also set during Trump's first term, which preceded Biden's term, during which we witnessed WITH OUR OWN EYES AND EARS numerous examples of Trump's own decline (which continues now) and which was pointed out by a number of health care professionals. Would you like examples? I have hundreds.

You might want to think about your recentism here. This goes back as far as Wilson.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:In other words, Ron Klain was de facto POTUS 2020-2024.

Oh kind of like how Steven Miller and Russell Vought are de facto POTUS right now? But one administration didn’t run the country off a cliff … 🤔🤔🤔🤔

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He had cancer while president. The deer in headlights stare during the debate was telling. Jill Biden is something else . I reported her to a DC Adult and Elder Abuse hotline last year

This. Remember when democrats kept saying that our comments about Biden's decline was "bad faith"? Right now they are being instructed not to question that Biden had an extremely rare de novo stage 4 diagnosis despite having been extensively tested.

Because once you allow yourself to ask these questions, other questions follow. Who was making decisions? Who was using the autopen? Does this all have something to do with those weird reports that Hunter was attending random meetings in the Oval Office? Was Biden treated or not? And what did people have to gain by keeping a terminally ill, mentally incompetent man in the presidency? Who was really in charge?

Pretty sure he had this prior to 2020 election.

+1. The country was being run by nameless, unelected staff. Even the senate confirmed cabinet members appeared to be in the dark. It was a constitutional crisis the entire time.

And yet somehow they didn’t manage to run the country into a ditch in 100 days.

I’d feel much safer is Biden was still in office.

Give me 100 sick Biden’s over Trumps dented old carcass, that’s a deal I’d take any day.

x1000

Luckily, the majority of Americans disagree with you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He had cancer while president. The deer in headlights stare during the debate was telling. Jill Biden is something else . I reported her to a DC Adult and Elder Abuse hotline last year

This. Remember when democrats kept saying that our comments about Biden's decline was "bad faith"? Right now they are being instructed not to question that Biden had an extremely rare de novo stage 4 diagnosis despite having been extensively tested.

Because once you allow yourself to ask these questions, other questions follow. Who was making decisions? Who was using the autopen? Does this all have something to do with those weird reports that Hunter was attending random meetings in the Oval Office? Was Biden treated or not? And what did people have to gain by keeping a terminally ill, mentally incompetent man in the presidency? Who was really in charge?

Pretty sure he had this prior to 2020 election.

+1. The country was being run by nameless, unelected staff. Even the senate confirmed cabinet members appeared to be in the dark. It was a constitutional crisis the entire time.

And yet somehow they didn’t manage to run the country into a ditch in 100 days.

I’d feel much safer is Biden was still in office.

Give me 100 sick Biden’s over Trumps dented old carcass, that’s a deal I’d take any day.

i
x1000

Ask all those voters what they think now.

Luckily, the majority of Americans disagree with you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He had cancer while president. The deer in headlights stare during the debate was telling. Jill Biden is something else . I reported her to a DC Adult and Elder Abuse hotline last year

This. Remember when democrats kept saying that our comments about Biden's decline was "bad faith"? Right now they are being instructed not to question that Biden had an extremely rare de novo stage 4 diagnosis despite having been extensively tested.

Because once you allow yourself to ask these questions, other questions follow. Who was making decisions? Who was using the autopen? Does this all have something to do with those weird reports that Hunter was attending random meetings in the Oval Office? Was Biden treated or not? And what did people have to gain by keeping a terminally ill, mentally incompetent man in the presidency? Who was really in charge?

Pretty sure he had this prior to 2020 election.

+1. The country was being run by nameless, unelected staff. Even the senate confirmed cabinet members appeared to be in the dark. It was a constitutional crisis the entire time.

And yet somehow they didn’t manage to run the country into a ditch in 100 days.

I’d feel much safer is Biden was still in office.

Give me 100 sick Biden’s over Trumps dented old carcass, that’s a deal I’d take any day.

x1000

Luckily, the majority of Americans disagree with you.

Ask those voters what they think now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think he knew about the cancer years ago. You have to just read between the lines of the statement:

“Last week, President Joe Biden was seen for a new finding of a prostate nodule after experiencing increasing urinary symptoms,” his personal office said in a statement. “On Friday he was diagnosed with prostate cancer, characterized by a Gleason score of 9 (Grade Group 5) with metastasis to the bone.”

It doesn’t say the cancer was “new”. Just that a “new” nodule was found. Then he was diagnosed with prostate cancer with a Gleason score of 9. But had he been diagnosed years earlier with a lower Gleason score?

I thought the same until news reported he never tested his PSA since 2014. What???

Don't believe everything you read.

They're trying to explain away "not knowing" to the cancer has spread... overnight.

The easiest answer is the correct one: they've been hiding and lying about derogatory info for a long time.

All this discussion about someone no longer potus, yet we still don’t know what Trump was hiding about his health in his first term and now. Amazing all the deflection tactics. Don’t look at the car crash happening right before you,

Biden was very clearly sundowning. Democratic Party was very clearly lying to the public and then gaslit them.

Legit questions about who was really in charge should not be drowned it by the “but but Trump”.

If we do not address this, this will set precedent.

The precedent was set long ago with Ronald Reagan's declining cognition in his second term, and the way his wife and aides managed it. It was also set during Trump's first term, which preceded Biden's term, during which we witnessed WITH OUR OWN EYES AND EARS numerous examples of Trump's own decline (which continues now) and which was pointed out by a number of health care professionals. Would you like examples? I have hundreds.

Look, there’s a lot to criticize about Trump. But, he appears to be physically vigorous for a man his age. You can debate his politics, but he answers questions at length every day. People are so DONE with the Democrat gas lighting.

You think he is physically vigorous?? And have you listened to his answers? It's usually total jibberish.