James Comey under investigation for insulting the king

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is beyond ridiculous.

Anyone who has ever worked in law enforcement - this former prosecutor included - knows full well that the term ‘86’ refers to ejecting and/or barring a patron or employee from a place of business.

8647 is an exhortation to get that loser out of our people’s White House.

I can’t believe a brain dead grand jury in eastern district North Carolina voted to indict on these bogus charges.

I look forward to seeing James Comey again vindicated by due process of law.

How does the Eastern District of NC have jurisdiction? The judge is a Bush appointee. Were they jury shopping? Even if the 86 shells were referring to someone I loved, I don’t read it as a threat. But this is a fight amongst Republicans. Comey is reaping what he sowed.

I assume the beach was in the district?

It will be dismissed. But Comey deserves this for what he did to Hillary and giving the election to trump.

You’re a despicable person for saying this. I don’t care what your politics are (I’m very liberal myself) or how much you hate James Comey, it’s unAmerican to celebrate this perversion of the Department of Justice and the rule of law in America. Shame on you.

I don’t love it, but Comey is among the 10 people in the country most responsible for Trump becoming president in the first place. If someone is going to get targeted by unfair Trump prosecutions, he’s among the most deserving.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://bsky.app/profile/annabower.bsky.social/post/3mkljqjixsc2b

In this clip, Kash Patel says the grand jury heard evidence that Comey deleted the '8647' post and apologized. Neither fact appears in the indictment.

Did the FBI director just disclose evidence presented before a grand jury?

That evidence was disclosed when it happened.

You seem confused about GJ secrecy. Even if evidence is known publicly or by persons outside the GJ (which essentially all evidence is), it is illegal to disclose the fact that it was presented to the GJ.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is beyond ridiculous.

Anyone who has ever worked in law enforcement - this former prosecutor included - knows full well that the term ‘86’ refers to ejecting and/or barring a patron or employee from a place of business.

8647 is an exhortation to get that loser out of our people’s White House.

I can’t believe a brain dead grand jury in eastern district North Carolina voted to indict on these bogus charges.

I look forward to seeing James Comey again vindicated by due process of law.

How does the Eastern District of NC have jurisdiction? The judge is a Bush appointee. Were they jury shopping? Even if the 86 shells were referring to someone I loved, I don’t read it as a threat. But this is a fight amongst Republicans. Comey is reaping what he sowed.

I assume the beach was in the district?

It will be dismissed. But Comey deserves this for what he did to Hillary and giving the election to trump.

You’re a despicable person for saying this. I don’t care what your politics are (I’m very liberal myself) or how much you hate James Comey, it’s unAmerican to celebrate this perversion of the Department of Justice and the rule of law in America. Shame on you.

James Comey gave the election to trump and he deserves to live with the terror he wrought!
Live with this fact.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://bsky.app/profile/annabower.bsky.social/post/3mkljqjixsc2b

In this clip, Kash Patel says the grand jury heard evidence that Comey deleted the '8647' post and apologized. Neither fact appears in the indictment.

Did the FBI director just disclose evidence presented before a grand jury?

That evidence was disclosed when it happened.

You seem confused about GJ secrecy. Even if evidence is known publicly or by persons outside the GJ (which essentially all evidence is), it is illegal to disclose the fact that it was presented to the GJ.

Former AUSA here. That’s basically right, but you’re missing that grand jury secrecy doesn’t apply to grand jury witnesses. Witnesses are not under an obligation to keep their testimony secret. If the USAO had an FBI agent testify in front of the grand jury, the agent could tell Patel the contents of his testimony and Patel could relay that information to the public.

These people are all dirtbags, but I don’t think this is necessarily a breach of grand jury secrecy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is beyond ridiculous.

Anyone who has ever worked in law enforcement - this former prosecutor included - knows full well that the term ‘86’ refers to ejecting and/or barring a patron or employee from a place of business.

8647 is an exhortation to get that loser out of our people’s White House.

I can’t believe a brain dead grand jury in eastern district North Carolina voted to indict on these bogus charges.

I look forward to seeing James Comey again vindicated by due process of law.

How does the Eastern District of NC have jurisdiction? The judge is a Bush appointee. Were they jury shopping? Even if the 86 shells were referring to someone I loved, I don’t read it as a threat. But this is a fight amongst Republicans. Comey is reaping what he sowed.

I assume the beach was in the district?

It will be dismissed. But Comey deserves this for what he did to Hillary and giving the election to trump.

You’re a despicable person for saying this. I don’t care what your politics are (I’m very liberal myself) or how much you hate James Comey, it’s unAmerican to celebrate this perversion of the Department of Justice and the rule of law in America. Shame on you.

I don’t love it, but Comey is among the 10 people in the country most responsible for Trump becoming president in the first place. If someone is going to get targeted by unfair Trump prosecutions, he’s among the most deserving.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Comey knew full well what he was doing. It beggars the imagination that the former head of the FBI would claim not to know the very common usage of "86." He has also yet to explain what the message "8647" meant otherwise without the common meaning of "86."

So, he deliberately posted a death threat against POTUS, knowing how serious that is especially from someone with his platform, and then lied about it. I hope he suffers serious consequences if only for being such an arrogant, dishonest, attention-whoring coward.

86 always meant throw out in my work experience.

[Anonymous]

86 means toss out, not hurt. He really is a petty b, isn't he?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

What, the special MAGA snowflakes are afraid of seashells now?

Someone get them a safe space.

LOL. Afraid? No.

Just noting that this seems to be Comey's MO for sending out the bat signals to his followers.

His “followers”?! He has followers? Who?! I can’t stand him. He threw the election to Trump after his announcement about investigating HRC. What American likes him??

Yes, shame on him for circumventing FOIA by keeping official e-mails on an unsecure private server he controlled and letting thousands end up on the laptop of a sex offender and permanently deleting 30,000 records. Oh wait. . .

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Comey knew full well what he was doing. It beggars the imagination that the former head of the FBI would claim not to know the very common usage of "86." He has also yet to explain what the message "8647" meant otherwise without the common meaning of "86."

So, he deliberately posted a death threat against POTUS, knowing how serious that is especially from someone with his platform, and then lied about it. I hope he suffers serious consequences if only for being such an arrogant, dishonest, attention-whoring coward.

And blamed it on his wife no less

[Anonymous]

I have no love lost for Comey, but anyone who says that they believe the sum and substance of this case constitutes an actual threat is either a liar or a hopeless moron.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is beyond ridiculous.

Anyone who has ever worked in law enforcement - this former prosecutor included - knows full well that the term ‘86’ refers to ejecting and/or barring a patron or employee from a place of business.

8647 is an exhortation to get that loser out of our people’s White House.

I can’t believe a brain dead grand jury in eastern district North Carolina voted to indict on these bogus charges.

I look forward to seeing James Comey again vindicated by due process of law.

How does the Eastern District of NC have jurisdiction? The judge is a Bush appointee. Were they jury shopping? Even if the 86 shells were referring to someone I loved, I don’t read it as a threat. But this is a fight amongst Republicans. Comey is reaping what he sowed.

I assume the beach was in the district?

It will be dismissed. But Comey deserves this for what he did to Hillary and giving the election to trump.

You’re a despicable person for saying this. I don’t care what your politics are (I’m very liberal myself) or how much you hate James Comey, it’s unAmerican to celebrate this perversion of the Department of Justice and the rule of law in America. Shame on you.

James Comey gave the election to trump and he deserves to live with the terror he wrought!
Live with this fact.

Well, we did elect Trump twice. Even had four years to think about it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is beyond ridiculous.

Anyone who has ever worked in law enforcement - this former prosecutor included - knows full well that the term ‘86’ refers to ejecting and/or barring a patron or employee from a place of business.

8647 is an exhortation to get that loser out of our people’s White House.

I can’t believe a brain dead grand jury in eastern district North Carolina voted to indict on these bogus charges.

I look forward to seeing James Comey again vindicated by due process of law.

How does the Eastern District of NC have jurisdiction? The judge is a Bush appointee. Were they jury shopping? Even if the 86 shells were referring to someone I loved, I don’t read it as a threat. But this is a fight amongst Republicans. Comey is reaping what he sowed.

I assume the beach was in the district?

It will be dismissed. But Comey deserves this for what he did to Hillary and giving the election to trump.

You’re a despicable person for saying this. I don’t care what your politics are (I’m very liberal myself) or how much you hate James Comey, it’s unAmerican to celebrate this perversion of the Department of Justice and the rule of law in America. Shame on you.

James Comey gave the election to trump and he deserves to live with the terror he wrought!
Live with this fact.

Yeah. He forced Hillary to keep her official e-mails on an unsecured private server in her basement and on Anthony Wiener's laptop. Has she ever owned this?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I’m pretty sure there a bunch of other MAGAs who posted them same. It’s going to make for quite the selective prosecution motion.

Trumps first selection for AG no less!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

What, the special MAGA snowflakes are afraid of seashells now?

Someone get them a safe space.

LOL. Afraid? No.

Just noting that this seems to be Comey's MO for sending out the bat signals to his followers.

His “followers”?! He has followers? Who?! I can’t stand him. He threw the election to Trump after his announcement about investigating HRC. What American likes him??

Yes, shame on him for circumventing FOIA by keeping official e-mails on an unsecure private server he controlled and letting thousands end up on the laptop of a sex offender and permanently deleting 30,000 records. Oh wait. . .

Are you really criticizing Hillary Clinton because her assistant happened to be married to a sex offender?

[Anonymous]

lol