Companies are on the war path against remote work

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Dear Lord are there people who actually believe that someone shopping at Target at 2 pm is not capable of being supremely productive for their company? How antiquated.


2pm is still in prime work hours, for all of the US. NO you cannot be supremely productive from Target mid-day.

There I said it.

No I'm not a dinosaur, grandma, or meemaw. I'm still in my 30s.


You don’t know there are 3 different time zones? What if I primarily work with staff in London. Since it’s 8 PM there am I allowed to do my Target run at 2 PM so I can hold 7 AM calls with the London team?

You don’t seem to understand that technology improves efficiencies.


I do 7am meetings London, 11-4 NY and towards end of Day San Fran. Sunday nights Asia and India.

My U.K. people usually available to 5pm DC time. My San Fran People till 2 am DC time. We all our online 16 hours a day. I don’t sleep much I am online 18 hours a day 7 days a week.

I only work 8-9 hours a day but I am available. And if I did go to target I have laptop in car so can use hotspot.

That is how real remote works as companies are open 24/7 and staff is all over the globe.

If fed workers did real remote they beg to go back in person with no remote access


This. I’m “available” around 10-12 hours a day. I do bus stop pickups, grocery runs, go on a run at lunch etc. My employer doesn’t care. They care about my deliverables and that I participate in certain meetings.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Commute and traffic were awful this week on the beltway.


Public transit is a thing.


A dying thing.


An untimely, super long, unsafe, thing!


so ignorant. It's much, much, much safer than driving. It's also not any longer.


For most people driving is 1/2 the time. For my office, I can drive to the office in the time it would take to simply walk to the station from my office.

Agreed, your risk of dying is higher in a car, but risk of crime is much higher in metro these days.


I live 8 miles from my in office downtown DC. It took 65 minutes to commute by metro + bus. Now it takes even longer because metro trains are so spaced out and it's unpredictable (15 min between trains vs 2). It's a 15 min drive.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Commute and traffic were awful this week on the beltway.


Public transit is a thing.


A dying thing.


An untimely, super long, unsafe, thing!


so ignorant. It's much, much, much safer than driving. It's also not any longer.


For most people driving is 1/2 the time. For my office, I can drive to the office in the time it would take to simply walk to the station from my office.

Agreed, your risk of dying is higher in a car, but risk of crime is much higher in metro these days.


Who the hell cares? On AVERAGE taking public transport in this area is faster and safer unless you leave your house at 4:00 am and return home at 8:00 pm I'm not talking about people who live in DC proper. And no, metro is not riskier than driving. Also, it's much better for the environment not to drive.


Metro is much more expensive for me than driving and I don’t live close to a station anyway. No thank you.


You chose to live in a desolate area, so you can put up with a car commute & stop whining.

Are you daft? I’m not whining. I have a beautiful big house in my “desolate area”. I have a lovely new comfortable car and listen to audiobooks on my commute. You’re the one getting bent out of shape that everyone isn’t taking Metro. 😂
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Commute and traffic were awful this week on the beltway.


Public transit is a thing.


A dying thing.


An untimely, super long, unsafe, thing!


so ignorant. It's much, much, much safer than driving. It's also not any longer.


For most people driving is 1/2 the time. For my office, I can drive to the office in the time it would take to simply walk to the station from my office.

Agreed, your risk of dying is higher in a car, but risk of crime is much higher in metro these days.


I live 8 miles from my in office downtown DC. It took 65 minutes to commute by metro + bus. Now it takes even longer because metro trains are so spaced out and it's unpredictable (15 min between trains vs 2). It's a 15 min drive.


Where do you live? When I lived on Conn Ave and commuted to Foggy Bottom it was almost always longer than 15 min in the car. This was pre pandemic.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:We (Fed, hybrid but heavily in-person) had two resignations at the end of last week to take jobs with more remote work. We will not be able to replace them at their skill level because the work is specialized. Leadership is furious with OMB.


We (fed) went through a hiring for a highly skilled position (Ph.D. plus substantial experience) and found a great candidate who took the job. Then HR said it would have to be in person. They quit before they arrived.


That's on HR - why did they bait and switch? Remote or not should be upfront!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Dear Lord are there people who actually believe that someone shopping at Target at 2 pm is not capable of being supremely productive for their company? How antiquated.


It’s a SAHM saying that. Their job is not to think


While it is unquestionably true that *some* employees who are shopping at Target at 2 pm are high performers who are supremely productive for their company, my strong suspicion is that *most* of the employees who are shopping at Target at 2 pm on a WFH day are slacking off. IME extremely high performance employees get a lot of slack as a practical matter, whatever the formal policies, but it is simply true that there are a lot of people abusing work from home while claiming to be highly productive—and that category is ruining it for everybody.


And you’re convinced that if these same people were physically in the office at 2 PM, they would be productively working? Because I doubt anything would change besides their location.


I’m convinced that many of them would be doing more. My sense of human nature is that there are many people who can be productive if closely supervised, and will slack off if not. “When the cat’s away, the mice will play” is a proverb for a reason. You may not agree, and you may even be right, but do you really think that’s an *unreasonable* point of view?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Cities threatening to get rid of tax breaks for companies if they don’t RTO, because apparently small businesses are suffering, downtowns are becoming ghost towns, CRE values are plummeting & public transportation is being crime-filled due to normies no longer taking it.


Honestly, I am sick and tired if the FT WFH evangelists acting like these are not valid concerns. They are. Acting as if they are not is making the RTO worse. If you’re unwilling to meet halfway with hybrid, they’ll just make everyone come in all the time. The war path is over. People go back now.


If I can do my job 100% remotely why do I need to come into the office so the bakery down the street, which I never buy anything from, keeps getting tax breaks? That's just dumb.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Dear Lord are there people who actually believe that someone shopping at Target at 2 pm is not capable of being supremely productive for their company? How antiquated.


It’s a SAHM saying that. Their job is not to think


While it is unquestionably true that *some* employees who are shopping at Target at 2 pm are high performers who are supremely productive for their company, my strong suspicion is that *most* of the employees who are shopping at Target at 2 pm on a WFH day are slacking off. IME extremely high performance employees get a lot of slack as a practical matter, whatever the formal policies, but it is simply true that there are a lot of people abusing work from home while claiming to be highly productive—and that category is ruining it for everybody.


And you’re convinced that if these same people were physically in the office at 2 PM, they would be productively working? Because I doubt anything would change besides their location.


I’m convinced that many of them would be doing more. My sense of human nature is that there are many people who can be productive if closely supervised, and will slack off if not. “When the cat’s away, the mice will play” is a proverb for a reason. You may not agree, and you may even be right, but do you really think that’s an *unreasonable* point of view?


I don’t think it’s unreasonable but I think it’s wrong. I think the unproductive types spend a lot of time at work talking and chatting. It’s actually easier to determine someone’s productivity when they are working remotely. There were so many employees pre-pandemic who got by just by showing up at an office.

I also don’t think most employees are working in an office where management is closely monitoring them. Most managers are busy and don’t have the time to be checking to see if an employee is working at their computer or is doing something else.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Dear Lord are there people who actually believe that someone shopping at Target at 2 pm is not capable of being supremely productive for their company? How antiquated.


It’s a SAHM saying that. Their job is not to think


While it is unquestionably true that *some* employees who are shopping at Target at 2 pm are high performers who are supremely productive for their company, my strong suspicion is that *most* of the employees who are shopping at Target at 2 pm on a WFH day are slacking off. IME extremely high performance employees get a lot of slack as a practical matter, whatever the formal policies, but it is simply true that there are a lot of people abusing work from home while claiming to be highly productive—and that category is ruining it for everybody.


And you’re convinced that if these same people were physically in the office at 2 PM, they would be productively working? Because I doubt anything would change besides their location.


I’m convinced that many of them would be doing more. My sense of human nature is that there are many people who can be productive if closely supervised, and will slack off if not. “When the cat’s away, the mice will play” is a proverb for a reason. You may not agree, and you may even be right, but do you really think that’s an *unreasonable* point of view?


DP but I'm in my late 40s. I've been doing this a long time. There have been absolutely been times I've been in the office 5x a week and not productive. Chatting, running errands, or just going online. I always get my work done, am a high performer, and want to deliver good work. But we aren't robots. It is human nature to work to meet deadlines, slack during down times, etc.

Pre pandemic I worked at a global firm that encouraged hoteling and remote work. I WFH most of the time and went into the office usually 2x a week. I was much more productive at home most days.

Now I'm remote full time, going in maybe once every 6 weeks or attending big meetings/company retreats etc. I love it, it's conducive to my kind of work, and I'll never report to an office full time again.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Cities threatening to get rid of tax breaks for companies if they don’t RTO, because apparently small businesses are suffering, downtowns are becoming ghost towns, CRE values are plummeting & public transportation is being crime-filled due to normies no longer taking it.


Honestly, I am sick and tired if the FT WFH evangelists acting like these are not valid concerns. They are. Acting as if they are not is making the RTO worse. If you’re unwilling to meet halfway with hybrid, they’ll just make everyone come in all the time. The war path is over. People go back now.


If I can do my job 100% remotely why do I need to come into the office so the bakery down the street, which I never buy anything from, keeps getting tax breaks? That's just dumb.


It is "just dumb" to think that the broader implications of expanded WFH on communities, organizational profitability, tax base, environment, financial sector, etc. should be decided based on your individual productivity and whether or not you buy a sandwich.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Dear Lord are there people who actually believe that someone shopping at Target at 2 pm is not capable of being supremely productive for their company? How antiquated.


It’s a SAHM saying that. Their job is not to think


While it is unquestionably true that *some* employees who are shopping at Target at 2 pm are high performers who are supremely productive for their company, my strong suspicion is that *most* of the employees who are shopping at Target at 2 pm on a WFH day are slacking off. IME extremely high performance employees get a lot of slack as a practical matter, whatever the formal policies, but it is simply true that there are a lot of people abusing work from home while claiming to be highly productive—and that category is ruining it for everybody.


And you’re convinced that if these same people were physically in the office at 2 PM, they would be productively working? Because I doubt anything would change besides their location.


I’m convinced that many of them would be doing more. My sense of human nature is that there are many people who can be productive if closely supervised, and will slack off if not. “When the cat’s away, the mice will play” is a proverb for a reason. You may not agree, and you may even be right, but do you really think that’s an *unreasonable* point of view?


DP but I'm in my late 40s. I've been doing this a long time. There have been absolutely been times I've been in the office 5x a week and not productive. Chatting, running errands, or just going online. I always get my work done, am a high performer, and want to deliver good work. But we aren't robots. It is human nature to work to meet deadlines, slack during down times, etc.

Pre pandemic I worked at a global firm that encouraged hoteling and remote work. I WFH most of the time and went into the office usually 2x a week. I was much more productive at home most days.

Now I'm remote full time, going in maybe once every 6 weeks or attending big meetings/company retreats etc. I love it, it's conducive to my kind of work, and I'll never report to an office full time again.


NP. What you are doing, as an employee in your late 40s who is not coming in to the office, is you are not giving any training or mentoring, formal or informal, to the young workers who are just starting out. You were helped throughout your career, especially in beginning, by working with or for more senior people, who would give you advice, show you how to do it, help you. Now you are declining to do the same for the younger workers.

Whether you care about the stores who were supported by you before, whether you should care about them or not, you clearly don't care about your company, the younger workers, or anyone besides yourself.
Anonymous
Maybe someone has raised this before but for me, the mental health benefits of not being in person in a toxic workplace and not having to be stuck in a car/metro for 12 hours a week are the main reason I want to continue WFH.

I have been at my company for a long time. It’s top heavy, toxic, and has a lot of senior staff who are paid a lot of money to do very little but rearrange deck chairs while wearing suits and giving the appearance of doing work while really just watching their underlings do everything.

Pre COVID I did all the “things” younger employers think they need to do to get ahead. Worked long hours, was insanely productive, worked through lunch, networked, volunteered for committees, got a work “mentor,” did professional development seminars, had outstanding job performance, etc. It didn’t really serve me the way I thought it would at all. I ended up on a team with real issues (bullying, racism, former employees suing for discrimination) and managed to emerge unscathed with a reputation for doing great work, but what I eventually realized was that no one was going to promote me. The higher ups would obscure my contributions and try to make it seem like they were responsible for the good work I did. I only got raises and promotions by demanding them and writing memos explaining in painstaking detail all my achievements, having very uncomfortable conversations with my boss who clearly didn’t want to stick her neck out but ultimately realizes she had to (or she’d lose her top performer), getting peers to share their salaries with me, etc. and it still took nearly a year each time.

I was able to transition to WFH full time during COVID and I never want to go back. Being home I am able to largely be outside of the toxic crazymaking, bullying, grandstanding, micro aggressions, and shameless self-promotion that the crazies engage in to get to the top (or to try to stay in a leadership position because they actually don’t do anything meaningful for the company so playing office politics is their only way to get job security). The last company I worked with was like this, too, so I have no faith that elsewhere it would be different. I would like to hope it would be, but I am not holding my breath.

For me, you can’t put a price on the mental health benefits of WFH. I sometimes miss the “friendships” I had in the office, but let’s be honest - those are never that real anyway in corporate America.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Maybe someone has raised this before but for me, the mental health benefits of not being in person in a toxic workplace and not having to be stuck in a car/metro for 12 hours a week are the main reason I want to continue WFH.

I have been at my company for a long time. It’s top heavy, toxic, and has a lot of senior staff who are paid a lot of money to do very little but rearrange deck chairs while wearing suits and giving the appearance of doing work while really just watching their underlings do everything.

Pre COVID I did all the “things” younger employers think they need to do to get ahead. Worked long hours, was insanely productive, worked through lunch, networked, volunteered for committees, got a work “mentor,” did professional development seminars, had outstanding job performance, etc. It didn’t really serve me the way I thought it would at all. I ended up on a team with real issues (bullying, racism, former employees suing for discrimination) and managed to emerge unscathed with a reputation for doing great work, but what I eventually realized was that no one was going to promote me. The higher ups would obscure my contributions and try to make it seem like they were responsible for the good work I did. I only got raises and promotions by demanding them and writing memos explaining in painstaking detail all my achievements, having very uncomfortable conversations with my boss who clearly didn’t want to stick her neck out but ultimately realizes she had to (or she’d lose her top performer), getting peers to share their salaries with me, etc. and it still took nearly a year each time.

I was able to transition to WFH full time during COVID and I never want to go back. Being home I am able to largely be outside of the toxic crazymaking, bullying, grandstanding, micro aggressions, and shameless self-promotion that the crazies engage in to get to the top (or to try to stay in a leadership position because they actually don’t do anything meaningful for the company so playing office politics is their only way to get job security). The last company I worked with was like this, too, so I have no faith that elsewhere it would be different. I would like to hope it would be, but I am not holding my breath.

For me, you can’t put a price on the mental health benefits of WFH. I sometimes miss the “friendships” I had in the office, but let’s be honest - those are never that real anyway in corporate America.


You sound exhausting. No wonder they want you to not go to office
Anonymous
It's funny, the younger people in my office were excited to go back to in person work.

Six months later, they are want to go back to wfh because they have figured out that you have to produce just as much work sitting in an open office with other people talking and making noise all day long, so you end up wearing noise canceling headphones all day and it's just like being at home by yourself.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:It's funny, the younger people in my office were excited to go back to in person work.

Six months later, they are want to go back to wfh because they have figured out that you have to produce just as much work sitting in an open office with other people talking and making noise all day long, so you end up wearing noise canceling headphones all day and it's just like being at home by yourself.


Well open offices are in the 9 circles to hell, so no surprise there.

I like both working from home, and working in the office, provided both options have a dedicated office space. No open office, or dining room table offices with kids running around.
post reply Forum Index » Jobs and Careers
Message Quick Reply
Go to: