Tucker out at Fox News????

[Anonymous]

Jesse Watters should be fired tomorrow morning for this. Unreal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:NYT has some of the redacted texts

I’m not convinced this is what got him the boot. Tucker has said much worse. This was tame in comparison to a lot of his other comments. It had to be something he said personally about Murdoch.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NYT has some of the redacted texts

I’m not convinced this is what got him the boot. Tucker has said much worse. This was tame in comparison to a lot of his other comments. It had to be something he said personally about Murdoch.

+1

I'm sure there's a whole lot more to the story. Tucker's been flying high on his own supply for a long long time and I'm sure there's a lot worse he hubristically thought he could say and get away with.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Jesse Watters should be fired tomorrow morning for this. Unreal.

Auditioning for tucker’s time slot and FOX fan base.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NYT has some of the redacted texts

I’m not convinced this is what got him the boot. Tucker has said much worse. This was tame in comparison to a lot of his other comments. It had to be something he said personally about Murdoch.

+1

I'm sure there's a whole lot more to the story. Tucker's been flying high on his own supply for a long long time and I'm sure there's a lot worse he hubristically thought he could say and get away with.

+1 and note the byline

[Anonymous]

Auditioning in Tucker’s time slot:

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Jesse Watters should be fired tomorrow morning for this. Unreal.

Not worth firing someone. Worst result would be to have uninteresting people on TV. Same with Don Lemon about women being past their prime.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Jesse Watters should be fired tomorrow morning for this. Unreal.

New target!!!

[Anonymous]

the fox clown show's lights seem to be dimming for more extreme bands of idiots that better reflect the craven nature of the republic party. \/0\/

[Anonymous]

He's back. And, his following will be massive.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NYT has some of the redacted texts

I’m not convinced this is what got him the boot. Tucker has said much worse. This was tame in comparison to a lot of his other comments. It had to be something he said personally about Murdoch.

+1

I'm sure there's a whole lot more to the story. Tucker's been flying high on his own supply for a long long time and I'm sure there's a lot worse he hubristically thought he could say and get away with.

Would falsifying the Jan 6 insurrection videos he had exclusive assess to in order to make the rioters look like peaceful protestors have been enough to get TC suddenly fired - after Fox lost the massive law suit?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NYT has some of the redacted texts

I’m not convinced this is what got him the boot. Tucker has said much worse. This was tame in comparison to a lot of his other comments. It had to be something he said personally about Murdoch.

+1

I'm sure there's a whole lot more to the story. Tucker's been flying high on his own supply for a long long time and I'm sure there's a lot worse he hubristically thought he could say and get away with.

Would falsifying the Jan 6 insurrection videos he had exclusive assess to in order to make the rioters look like peaceful protestors have been enough to get TC suddenly fired - after Fox lost the massive law suit?

Nice try. He and his producers didn't do that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He's back. And, his following will be massive.

He looked like he fell asleep in a tanning bed

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He's back. And, his following will be massive.

I don't doubt that it will. The sheeple must be led by their grievance god.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NYT has some of the redacted texts

I’m not convinced this is what got him the boot. Tucker has said much worse. This was tame in comparison to a lot of his other comments. It had to be something he said personally about Murdoch.

Tucker Carlson, with video provided by Speaker McCarthy, falsely depicts Jan. 6 riot as a peaceful gathering
Some Republicans are looking to the tapes for vindication. Others say it's a mistake for the party to look backward to Jan. 6, particularly after election deniers lost many 2022 races.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna73673

Carlson focused Monday’s segment on promoting former President Donald Trump’s narrative by showing video of his supporters walking calmly around the U.S. Capitol. He asserted that other media accounts lied about the attack, proclaiming that while there were some bad apples, most of the rioters were peaceful and calling them "sightseers," not "insurrectionists."

+1

I'm sure there's a whole lot more to the story. Tucker's been flying high on his own supply for a long long time and I'm sure there's a lot worse he hubristically thought he could say and get away with.

Would falsifying the Jan 6 insurrection videos he had exclusive assess to in order to make the rioters look like peaceful protestors have been enough to get TC suddenly fired - after Fox lost the massive law suit?

Nice try. He and his producers didn't do that.