War with Iran

Anonymous
Leavitt confirms that the current "ballpark" total of US soldiers injured fighting Iran is 150
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Can someone on the right please tell me why we are at war with Iran?


Because of the book of revelation
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Has Trump TACOd yet?


Not yet. Sen Blumenthal just came out of an intelligence briefing and it sounds like boots on the ground are on the table again.



The special election for MTG's seat is today. The polling can't have been good.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Has Trump TACOd yet?


Not yet. Sen Blumenthal just came out of an intelligence briefing and it sounds like boots on the ground are on the table again.



Iran is vast—Trump is going to murder thousands and thousands of our troops.

Putin backing Iran and Putin telling Trump to escalate. Trump is going to decimate our military to hide his child rapes and then Russia will take all of Europe.

Trump needs to go NOW


Trump needs to go
But so too does
Netanyahu
Mojtaba Khameini
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Leavitt confirms that the current "ballpark" total of US soldiers injured fighting Iran is 150


She should be sharing precise numbers. These represent the nation’s blood. It’s a precious resource.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Leavitt confirms that the current "ballpark" total of US soldiers injured fighting Iran is 150


She should be sharing precise numbers. These represent the nation’s blood. It’s a precious resource.


It took long enough to tell us. I guess they didn’t want to distract from their perfect video game war.

Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Leavitt confirms that the current "ballpark" total of US soldiers injured fighting Iran is 150


“Ballpark”? JFC. Guess that’s why Trump wore a baseball hat to the transfer.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Leavitt confirms that the current "ballpark" total of US soldiers injured fighting Iran is 150


“Ballpark”? JFC. Guess that’s why Trump wore a baseball hat to the transfer.


It’s all a game to them
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Leavitt confirms that the current "ballpark" total of US soldiers injured fighting Iran is 150


They have been quoting this number on X for at least 3 days now and the mainstream media was hiding it. This is ridiculous that you all are finding this out now. A lot of what I am reading and video footage I am seeing on NYT and WaPo is at least 2-3 days old. This is why boomers need to get off of network news and create X and Substack accounts.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Leavitt confirms that the current "ballpark" total of US soldiers injured fighting Iran is 150


She should be sharing precise numbers. These represent the nation’s blood. It’s a precious resource.


It took long enough to tell us. I guess they didn’t want to distract from their perfect video game war.



Exclusive: As many as 150 US troops wounded so far in Iran war, sources say
By Phil Stewart and Idrees Ali
March 10, 20262:14 PM EDTUpdated 1 hour ago
https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/many-150-us-troops-wounded-so-far-iran-war-sources-say-2026-03-10/
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:


Iran has long range artillery and tons of drones that can hit tankers in the straight. The only way to secure the straight is with ground troops on the Iranian side of the straight. Even if that happens the drones have a long reach. If I were the Iranians I would have stashed drones(prepositioned) like the Ukrainians did to hit Russian airbases.

Or end the war.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Leavitt confirms that the current "ballpark" total of US soldiers injured fighting Iran is 150


“Ballpark”? JFC. Guess that’s why Trump wore a baseball hat to the transfer.


Yes it is like the tomahawk missiles use to hit the school. The US military has telemetry and gps data on that strike but is still investigating? Type in a computer, pull up the data and your investigation is done. Now the US military does not know how many wounded soldiers it has?
Anonymous
Other rumors I have heard is the US military is running low of 20 mm Phalanx at the airbases. Many of the radars systems have been damaged and we only have a limited number.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Other rumors I have heard is the US military is running low of 20 mm Phalanx at the airbases. Many of the radars systems have been damaged and we only have a limited number.


This was two days ago.
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: