Donnie Dumptruck says Mar-A-Lago's been searched by the FBI

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Judge Dearie is not effing around.

Why?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That was fast -- 11th circuit has given TFG's team until Tuesday to respond to DOJ's motion to block the classified documents from being part of the Special Master's review. Same day they have to appear before Dearie.

Are they up to the task? LOL

That was swift. Not screwing around.

Entirely normal when dealing with a request for emergency stay.

No it looks like the Trumpist judges want to end this and end it quickly. Rumor is they will issue a summary ruling dismissing the case and tell DOJ to return everything to Trump.

“Rumor”? We don’t even know who will sit on the panel.

The appeals court is better positioned to kick the case back to Cannon and have her clarify her order. She’s given them a turd in a punchbowl they’re not inclined to deal with and it furthers the interest of delaying an ultimate resolution. It’s hard for the Eleventh Circuit to address the manufactured executive privilege claim, much less for Dearle to do so, absent judicial guidance from Cannon. The same is true with regard to “declassification” and the status of documents, at least 100 of which are marked classified, which are neither personal documents nor presidential records (absent handwritten notations), the only two categories contemplated by Cannon.

But it’s hard to predict what will happen in the context of the urgent national security concerns expressed by DOJ. Dismissal of the case is not properly before the appeals court and there’s a negligible chance classified materials get returned to Trump without further classification status review by the intelligence community.

Did DOJ challenge Cannon's jurisdiction and are they pressing that claim on appeal? Because I am still trying to square that issue.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Judge Dearie is not effing around.

Why?

Probably because he's moving fast and Trump's legal team is spinning:

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Judge Dearie is not effing around.

Why?

Probably because he's moving fast and Trump's legal team is spinning:

Seriously? They wanted the SM to review classification, but now won't say whether Trump declassified the docs? This is insane.

[Anonymous]

Looks like Panda Man is going to be a star.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Looks like Panda Man is going to be a star.

mens rea for espionage/illegal handling of classified documents.

This will make DOJ conviction nearly certain.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Looks like Panda Man is going to be a star.

God, Trump is such a pathetic dipshit. How do his supporters just keep getting duped over and over again? You would think after while they would be embarrassed to be played for fools over and over again.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Looks like Panda Man is going to be a star.

But could Trump then say Panda Man is lying, and then it becomes a he said, he said?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like Panda Man is going to be a star.

But could Trump then say Panda Man is lying, and then it becomes a he said, he said?

Sure, but what incentive does Herschmann have to lie?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like Panda Man is going to be a star.

But could Trump then say Panda Man is lying, and then it becomes a he said, he said?

Sure, but what incentive does Herschmann have to lie?

Panda Man has credibility on his side from his testimony in Jan. 6 hearings. He testified under oath so he's not going to lie now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like Panda Man is going to be a star.

But could Trump then say Panda Man is lying, and then it becomes a he said, he said?

If Trump decides to testify he’s even dumber than I thought he was.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like Panda Man is going to be a star.

But could Trump then say Panda Man is lying, and then it becomes a he said, he said?

Sure, but what incentive does Herschmann have to lie?

Panda Man has credibility on his side from his testimony in Jan. 6 hearings. He testified under oath so he's not going to lie now.

He also very likely has documentation supporting his testimony. It’s very likely he put this in emails to other WH officials and/or MFRs. Herschmann knew he was dealing with a bunch of crooks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Judge Dearie is not effing around.

Why?

Probably because he's moving fast and Trump's legal team is spinning:

that Gollum tweet is hilarious!!!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like Panda Man is going to be a star.

But could Trump then say Panda Man is lying, and then it becomes a he said, he said?

Herschmann almost certainly left a carefully planned paper trail to cover himself.

[Anonymous]

Is is weird that I have a ladyboner for Herschmann?
Something about that guy …
I guess I could just be attracted to pandas.
Yeah that seems more likely.