Kavanaugh vote postponed. Judiciary Committee hearing on Sexual Assault complain Monday.

[Anonymous]

It took her six days to figure out her memory of this? She attended social events with him (wedding) and had smiling pictures taken with him? Give me a break.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, we have allegations of Ford being held down with Kavanaugh covering her mouth as she tried to scream. We have allegations of Kavanaugh shoving his penis in Ramirez's face at a party. And, we have several people from both alleged allegations saying it never happened. Avenatti represents a third woman -- details undisclosed at the moment. (Maybe this one is significant, maybe it's not -- Avenatti is a self-promoter above all else.)

Corrected your incorrect post. You are welcome.

Thank you, Ms. Lawyer. Now it's time for Kavanaugh to withdraw his name, firmly reiterating his innocence as he does so.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Kavanaugh defenders don't seem to understand, Gorsich didn't have these issues because, even if you disagree with some of his writing, he wasn't a total douchebag. I know it is a low bar, but we have to do better in our judicial system.

Gorsuch did not have these issues because he was filling the seat of Scalia.
This is different. It is a swing seat.

Remember - Schumer: We will do “whatever it takes” to block this nominee.

[Anonymous]

Wonder if the 60 or so Brett backing women just got a case of the vapors.

[Anonymous]

Man you Dems are a dirty lot. Come on GOP, they wanna play hard ball, we can play too

[Anonymous]

I love how some posters act like it is significant that these women are Democrats. Folks, this is why women turn away from the Republican Party. A lot of women are sick of the BS. The republican war on women is core to the party. So yeah, women turn away. It’s not a conspiracy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The allegation from Tale has nothing to do with Mark Judge, which means the Avanetti person is potentially a third allegation.

Yes, he has said.

Also seeing tweets that democrats on committee have received info from other women who are unwillingly to go public. May talk to FBI though.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If it has to be a man, we need more confirmed bachelors who live in cabins amongst books and dine on apples and plain yogurt. No skeletons. Just a devotion to plain living and judging.

Please. There's a reason Gorsuch, Roberts, etc. didn't have to fend off these sorts of unsavory allegations. It's because they're not unsavory people.

I have no doubt they have skeletons in their closets too. Almost everyone does.
Except for maybe my niece who entered a convent at age 18. I guess we could start looking for Supreme Court justices therebut they’d definitely be anti Roe v. wade.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kavanaugh defenders don't seem to understand, Gorsich didn't have these issues because, even if you disagree with some of his writing, he wasn't a total douchebag. I know it is a low bar, but we have to do better in our judicial system.

Gorsuch did not have these issues because he was filling the seat of Scalia.
This is different. It is a swing seat.

Remember - Schumer: We will do “whatever it takes” to block this nominee.

Gorsuch did not have these issues because he was not a sexual harasser. See how simple it is?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Man you Dems are a dirty lot. Come on GOP, they wanna play hard ball, we can play too

Merrick Garland says, don't pick someone with a sordid past.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Man you Dems are a dirty lot. Come on GOP, they wanna play hard ball, we can play too

You already did when you denied the Garland confirmation. I’m currently playing the world’s smalllest violin for you.

[Anonymous]

I think everyone needs to acknowledge that Dr. Ford is quite the heroine here - she hung in there strong, in the face of horrific personal attacks, long enough for others to finally feel like they had to come forward too.

[Anonymous]

The New Yorker could not independently verify that Kavanaugh was even at the party.

If this turns out to be a hit piece with no verification, Ronan Farrow has destroyed his reputation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If it has to be a man, we need more confirmed bachelors who live in cabins amongst books and dine on apples and plain yogurt. No skeletons. Just a devotion to plain living and judging.

Please. There's a reason Gorsuch, Roberts, etc. didn't have to fend off these sorts of unsavory allegations. It's because they're not unsavory people.

I have no doubt they have skeletons in their closets too. Almost everyone does.
Except for maybe my niece who entered a convent at age 18. I guess we could start looking for Supreme Court justices therebut they’d definitely be anti Roe v. wade.

No one is perfect but the reason that we are finding so many skeletons in the closet of Kavanaugh and not Roberts and Gorsuch is that Kavanaugh s a slimier person. GOP needs to do a better job vetting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think everyone needs to acknowledge that Dr. Ford is quite the heroine here - she hung in there strong, in the face of horrific personal attacks, long enough for others to finally feel like they had to come forward too.

And she’s testifying even though people like Lindsay Graham and Mitch McConnell said they were going to vote for Kavanaugh no matter what she said. That’s courage.