Eaton Thrown Under the Bus

[Anonymous]

The proposals provide that John Eaton ES will be forced out of Deal, and be assigned to Hardy, What do Eaton parents think of that??

[Anonymous]

this has been theorized for the last two years at least. the fact that this plan is part of a proposal should not be a surprise, at all. Eaton is easy pickins' for this plan considering its large OOB population. Don't like the plan? you need to motivate and advocate quickly.

[Anonymous]

The proposal is particularly concerning, given the rumors that Hardy will be moved out of the Wilson cluster.

[Anonymous]

Again, if that happens (Hardy moved out of Wilson cluster) when would it take effect? Should this be a concern for current Hardy students or is this dependent on the creation of a new HS, which could take years?

[Anonymous]

Who knows. This whole plan is supposed to take effect for lotteries at the end of this year.

[Anonymous]

It really does feel like Eaton was thrown under the bus. Sure, easy to say it's been discussed for years, but so have other options at other schools. To have only Eaton moved from Deal, and Oyster moved from Wilson, seems just like a well, we've got to show we've hit something in Ward 3 so they'll take the hit. Why does Bancroft, which serves a mostly hispanic population, feed to deal when it is less than half a mile from CHEC? I mean come on.

On the other hand, someone has to take the hit, and as long as Hardy feeds to Wilson this isn't entirely disastrous for Eaton. But it's not good.

Eaton does have a fair number of OOB kids - including a lot from Mt Pleasant who prefer something other than Bancroft. Getting to Hardy is harder for OOB than getting to Deal.

[Anonymous]

When Proposal B talks about Hardy switching to a "New" high school, it is not clear whether it is talking about a newly built high school or a different high school, which would be new to Hardy students. It is doubtful that DC would build a new school in Ward 3 given the underutilization of other high schools throughout the city. In that case, Hardy would leap-frog over other neighborhoods that feed into Wilson in order to go to a high school to the East.

[Anonymous]

Perhaps DCPS is gambling that for OOB Eaton families, Hardy may not be as good, but it will be "good enough."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Eaton does have a fair number of OOB kids - including a lot from Mt Pleasant who prefer something other than Bancroft. Getting to Hardy is harder for OOB than getting to Deal.

If they don't prefer close/inboundary and are willing to drive their kids west - so be it.

[Anonymous]

Totally.

Give up your K spots! Give 'em to me!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:When Proposal B talks about Hardy switching to a "New" high school, it is not clear whether it is talking about a newly built high school or a different high school, which would be new to Hardy students. It is doubtful that DC would build a new school in Ward 3 given the underutilization of other high schools throughout the city. In that case, Hardy would leap-frog over other neighborhoods that feed into Wilson in order to go to a high school to the East.

And let's be real. The only city-owned site of any size west of Rock Creek is Duke Ellington (which has a building but no campus with fields), And the decision seems to have been made to keep Ellington where it is, despite it's non-central location and the fact that it is no where near the Metro. The Third District police station site on Idaho Ave, would work for an elementary school but not for a HS, and you'd have to evict the cops. The logical conclusion is that the "new" high school to which DCPS vaguely refers is no where near Hardy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Eaton does have a fair number of OOB kids - including a lot from Mt Pleasant who prefer something other than Bancroft. Getting to Hardy is harder for OOB than getting to Deal.

If they don't prefer close/inboundary and are willing to drive their kids west - so be it.

John Eaton is getting close to 50% in boundary, and I'll bet Cleveland Park families will not be thrilled about being forced to Hardy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When Proposal B talks about Hardy switching to a "New" high school, it is not clear whether it is talking about a newly built high school or a different high school, which would be new to Hardy students. It is doubtful that DC would build a new school in Ward 3 given the underutilization of other high schools throughout the city. In that case, Hardy would leap-frog over other neighborhoods that feed into Wilson in order to go to a high school to the East.

And let's be real. The only city-owned site of any size west of Rock Creek is Duke Ellington (which has a building but no campus with fields), And the decision seems to have been made to keep Ellington where it is, despite it's non-central location and the fact that it is no where near the Metro. The Third District police station site on Idaho Ave, would work for an elementary school but not for a HS, and you'd have to evict the cops. The logical conclusion is that the "new" high school to which DCPS vaguely refers is no where near Hardy.

Ellington is actually really accessible from the red line! The D2 at Dupont Circle literally sits at the metro for 10 minutes each morning, so kids just hope off metro, sit on the bus until it's ready to turn around, and get dropped off at Ellington's door. I myself do this multiple x per week.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When Proposal B talks about Hardy switching to a "New" high school, it is not clear whether it is talking about a newly built high school or a different high school, which would be new to Hardy students. It is doubtful that DC would build a new school in Ward 3 given the underutilization of other high schools throughout the city. In that case, Hardy would leap-frog over other neighborhoods that feed into Wilson in order to go to a high school to the East.

And let's be real. The only city-owned site of any size west of Rock Creek is Duke Ellington (which has a building but no campus with fields), And the decision seems to have been made to keep Ellington where it is, despite it's non-central location and the fact that it is no where near the Metro. The Third District police station site on Idaho Ave, would work for an elementary school but not for a HS, and you'd have to evict the cops. The logical conclusion is that the "new" high school to which DCPS vaguely refers is no where near Hardy.

Ellington is actually really accessible from the red line! The D2 at Dupont Circle literally sits at the metro for 10 minutes each morning, so kids just hope off metro, sit on the bus until it's ready to turn around, and get dropped off at Ellington's door. I myself do this multiple x per week.

A dedicated, purpose built performing arts school that is centrally located and more accessible to all by Metro would be superior. particularly if it were located near a performing arts complex like Arena.

[Anonymous]

Eaton parent here: If Principal Pride can improve Hardy in the ways she is proposing and STAYS AT HARDY, I think that prospective Hardy students and families may be pleasantly surprised. I would much rather send my child to a smaller MS than Deal anyway. All of this being said, I am far more concerned with the uncertainty of what high school my child may go to despite living just over a mile from Wilson.