Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
But this is easy to flip. Other people can see her behavior as understandable given Baldoni's and Heath's lack of professionalism. Especially given that she was recently postpartum and probably struggling a bit. Some of their behavior was unquestionably weird and uncomfortable, even if it wasn't SH. And she'd complain and they say it would stop but then something else would happen. She felt especially vulnerable in scenes where her body was on display to any degree (which is totally reasonable) and instead of making greater effort to ensure her comfort in those scenes, they did weird things that heightened her sense of exposure. I think they are both deeply flawed people who made dumb mistakes. I don't understand seeing him as some innocent victim. He put himself in this position to a great degree. And he even knew he had -- he wanted to talk about his neurodivergence in interviews to explain some of his "tone deaf" and inappropriate behavior. He knew he'd behaved badly. |
The both sides argument doesn’t work for me because ultimately she’s the one who decided to sue. Very hypocritical. But also, are we actually getting the amended complaint?! Waiting on pins and needles lol |
It seems like they were unhappy with Blake’s acting job in the birth scene. How better to coach her then show her video of what they wanted? |
| My understanding is that for something to sexual harassment, it must be “objectively” severe and pervasive. What PP describes is subjective. She explains how Lively was likely feeling extra sensitive due to her postpartum condition—which to me is confirming that this is not objective harassment. |
They already filmed it. It was over. At that point there's no good reason to show her the video except to reopen the argument over whether or not she should have been fully nude in the scene, something they should have decided well in advance of filming the scene, not the day of. This is exactly what I mean by unprofessional. It's just sloppy and lazy, IMO. |
The standard is actually what the average person would find "reasonable" -- it's a specific standard of objectivity. In any case, the examples I gave were specifically not of sexual harassment but to say that this is a weird, unprofessional way to behave and the toxic culture that evolved on that film set is at least party Baldoni's fault for engaging in a lot of weird and unprofessional behaviors. I have no idea why that's controversial. |
|
They go back and refill things all the time. Perhaps no point here when your star won’t even take direction |
Refilm not refill. |
| My understanding from the workplace was that harassment had to be pervasive and not an isolated incident, unless it was severe. For an isolated incident to qualify as harassment it would need to be so severe that it violates a zero tolerance policy (like calling someone a racial slur). These rules are in place to avoid exactly this type of situation where one side is uncomfortable but the other side has no way of knowing (e.g. Blake can use the word sexy but when Justin does it’s harassment). |
| I don’t know why the dead father stuff keeps popping up, that is the most obviously not actionable allegation she has |
The other side knew. She told Sony and had a meeting with Baldoni and co in May about all this and how uncomfortable she was shortly after they started filing in May. |
Whether or not an actor will be nude in a scene is not a question of "taking direction." It's a contract negotiation issue. |
And it never happened again from what I understand, so not pervasive. Her complaint is not that there was a recurrence but that they smeared her online in retaliation. |
It's weird and inappropriate. |