What is the wildest conspiracy theory you actually believe?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am so not a conspiracy theorist, but I do believe scientists have found a cure for cancer and Big Pharma won’t share it because of the ridiculous amount of money they make off cancer drugs alone.

Anyone with a couple of functioning brain cells knows this. I’m a cog in the industry. A cog that has seen the cure and people’s cancers erased.

Well, tell this to the a$$hole who just called me stupid.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not an anti vaxxer, but i'm also of the position that it is near impossible that vaccines don't have *some* permanent ill effects for *some* people. Whether it is one in a million that it causes autism, or other auto immune diseases, etc.... The claim that "we know vaccines are totally safe!" seems BS, because you can't claim the absence of things that have been studied. As in, if no one has ever studied whether, say, people who themselves had the MMR vaccine as kids are more likely to give birth to a kid with ASD or thyroid disease or whatever.... then it can't be ruled out.

DP. I think the vaccine-autism debate is a red herring. I suspect the real reason for the huge rise in autism and other developmental disorders is the widespread use of fertility treatments, often in situations that are high risk to start with (AMA, family history, etc). I don't think there's a conspiracy theory surrounding the issue, but I think there's a big push to avoid saying it.

Absolutely.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am so not a conspiracy theorist, but I do believe scientists have found a cure for cancer and Big Pharma won’t share it because of the ridiculous amount of money they make off cancer drugs alone.

Anyone with a couple of functioning brain cells knows this. I’m a cog in the industry. A cog that has seen the cure and people’s cancers erased.

Cancer is not one disease, nor does it function as a process in any same way. There isn't one "cure" for cancer.

Already, there have been great strides in getting cancer in remission. The "cure " is not about treatment, rather it is in DNA alteration, editing so people don't get it to begin with.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I believe a lot of "conspiracy theories" but one is that the vaccine causes infertility among other issues. I will not be taking it.

If that’s true, I’m even more likely to take it. Free birth control here I come.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:River Phoenix was murdered

I believe this and Johnny Depp has down involvement in it.

I think so too.

Explain? I'm confused

+1 I have no idea about this.. but a random asid I came across somewhat related to his crazy behavior
he’s bringing the drama to Fairfax and Angelina Jolie may be subpoenad
https://www.mercurynews.com/2020/12/11/johnny-depp-may-drag-angelina-jolie-and-other-a-list-women-into-his-next-court-fight/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not an anti vaxxer, but i'm also of the position that it is near impossible that vaccines don't have *some* permanent ill effects for *some* people. Whether it is one in a million that it causes autism, or other auto immune diseases, etc.... The claim that "we know vaccines are totally safe!" seems BS, because you can't claim the absence of things that have been studied. As in, if no one has ever studied whether, say, people who themselves had the MMR vaccine as kids are more likely to give birth to a kid with ASD or thyroid disease or whatever.... then it can't be ruled out.

DP. I think the vaccine-autism debate is a red herring. I suspect the real reason for the huge rise in autism and other developmental disorders is the widespread use of fertility treatments, often in situations that are high risk to start with (AMA, family history, etc). I don't think there's a conspiracy theory surrounding the issue, but I think there's a big push to avoid saying it.

Actually, this is one reason we decided not to pursue fertility treatments when I couldn't get pregnant, something like undiagnosed high functioning autism (non diagnosed) runs in both families. I think there are a lot of factors causing increased autism, especially toxic chemicals in the food supply, but I don't thi k vaccines have that much to do with it.

Or it’s just an increase in people being diagnosed, rather than just being dubbed “strange” or “idiots” or locked away in institution. I can think of several kids I grew up with in a Soviet country in the 80s who, looking back, likely had some sort of special needs (learning disabilities etc). They were just deemed “stupid” and shamed in class. Also, people are having kids much older (me included). Probably makes a difference.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am so not a conspiracy theorist, but I do believe scientists have found a cure for cancer and Big Pharma won’t share it because of the ridiculous amount of money they make off cancer drugs alone.

Anyone with a couple of functioning brain cells knows this. I’m a cog in the industry. A cog that has seen the cure and people’s cancers erased.

Well, tell this to the a$$hole who just called me stupid.

I’m glad there is a cure, please make sure it won’t turn us into zombies first 🧟‍♀️

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I believe a lot of "conspiracy theories" but one is that the vaccine causes infertility among other issues. I will not be taking it.

If that’s true, I’m even more likely to take it. Free birth control here I come.

It's been debunked but what a pity if you could strrlize yourself with one injection, way less invasive than surgery

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not an anti vaxxer, but i'm also of the position that it is near impossible that vaccines don't have *some* permanent ill effects for *some* people. Whether it is one in a million that it causes autism, or other auto immune diseases, etc.... The claim that "we know vaccines are totally safe!" seems BS, because you can't claim the absence of things that have been studied. As in, if no one has ever studied whether, say, people who themselves had the MMR vaccine as kids are more likely to give birth to a kid with ASD or thyroid disease or whatever.... then it can't be ruled out.

DP. I think the vaccine-autism debate is a red herring. I suspect the real reason for the huge rise in autism and other developmental disorders is the widespread use of fertility treatments, often in situations that are high risk to start with (AMA, family history, etc). I don't think there's a conspiracy theory surrounding the issue, but I think there's a big push to avoid saying it.

Actually, this is one reason we decided not to pursue fertility treatments when I couldn't get pregnant, something like undiagnosed high functioning autism (non diagnosed) runs in both families. I think there are a lot of factors causing increased autism, especially toxic chemicals in the food supply, but I don't thi k vaccines have that much to do with it.

I believe a huge cause of autism is that autistic (or people on the spectrum, more accurately) are now having children whereas in the past they did not. I read an article about this years ago. A lot of very smart, tech guys are now able to marry women and reproduce because they are successful. In the past, not as many of those people did not marry and reproduce.

[Anonymous]

Chelsea Clinton's biological father is Webster Hubbell.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^^The problem with this scenario and cancer is that it is no respector of persons. What if the CEO of a big pharma company gets cancer? Will they dip into their secret stash of effective drugs to cure it? Will they die like any ordinary schmuck?

Seriously, right? Like people like Steve Jobs, John McCain, Ted Kennedy, and David Koch would be dead of cancer if there was a cure.

Didn’t Steve Jobs delay pharmaceutical intervention as he had some other holistic treatment he wanted to pursue?

If this particular theory is true, that there’s a cancer cure and it’s being withheld, then the people listed are collateral damage. If someone wants there to be a narrative that cancer impacts everyone and there is no cure, then that includes people from all walks of life like John McCain.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^^The problem with this scenario and cancer is that it is no respector of persons. What if the CEO of a big pharma company gets cancer? Will they dip into their secret stash of effective drugs to cure it? Will they die like any ordinary schmuck?

Seriously, right? Like people like Steve Jobs, John McCain, Ted Kennedy, and David Koch would be dead of cancer if there was a cure.

Didn’t Steve Jobs delay pharmaceutical intervention as he had some other holistic treatment he wanted to pursue?

If this particular theory is true, that there’s a cancer cure and it’s being withheld, then the people listed are collateral damage. If someone wants there to be a narrative that cancer impacts everyone and there is no cure, then that includes people from all walks of life like John McCain.

It would be interesting to acquire some data on big pharma/top executive cause of death to see how many have died of cancer. By age, location, gender, decade in which they died - and then compare data to type of cancer, treatment efficacy for general population, etc.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I believe that we have not learned the truth about Saudi government involvement in 9/11. Not that they were involved at the top, but that some members of the royal family may have been.

I believe that the Russians have played a significant role in encouraging polarization through their use of Facebook and other social media.

Totally agree and it was because of Bush family ties with them. Supposedly, high level Saudis were allowed to fly out of the US after 9/11.

[Anonymous]

There was a second gunman at the Kennedy assassination totally unrelated to Oswald. Oswald was a nut that nobody could depend on for a hit. The other was probably not in the Grassy Knoll but in a sewer cover or something. And probably killed as soon as he took off.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Man did not walk on the moon.

How did the footprints get there?

It's a movie set. Watch Capricorn One.