Kavanaugh Accuser reveals her Identity

[Anonymous]

More reason to suspect the woman:

She signed the letter as Christine Blasey, the name she uses professionally.

Her LAWYER with a clear agenda says she took a polygraph. So put the results out to the public. All the below is, is words on a page. Put up or shut up:

She engaged Debra Katz, a Washington lawyer known for her work on sexual harassment cases. On the advice of Katz, who believed Ford would be attacked as a liar if she came forward, Ford took a polygraph test administered by a former FBI agent in early August. The results, which Katz provided to The Post, concluded that Ford was being truthful when she said a statement summarizing her allegations was accurate.

[Anonymous]

She's also a research PSYCHOLOGIST.

[Anonymous]

Another interesting tidbit in the Post story:

He said he recalled that his wife used Kavanaugh’s last name and voiced concern that Kavanaugh — then a federal judge — might one day be nominated to the Supreme Court.

That alone raises huge suspicion. How convenient of him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm fascinated that there are people willing to spend time poking holes into someone's sexual assault story. Living your best life, huh?

Ask the Duke lacrosse team.

Or the UVA fraternity members.

The "well she has nothing to gain so obvously she's being truthful" trope needs to end NOW. What did Jackie from UVA have to gain from concoting the RS story? Nothing. Some people are just mentally ill.

Oh, that's good!!

Yes, she's mentally ill, so she concocted this story, which she put forth anonymously, because she's mentally ill. But then she, being mentally ill, changed her mind and decided to go public with an accusation that will incite people like you, Natasha, to accuse her of being mentally ill!! Sounds like something a mentally ill person would do!!

Speaking of mentally ill, PP, peppering your comments with “Natasha” and “Boris” makes one wonder about your paranoia.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The GOP probably knew about this over the summer when the whole "sen feinstein hired a chinese spy" think broke.

BS. The Dems planned this. They sat on the letter until the 11th hour. Their timing is choreographed, just like their playacting the morning of the first hearing. This is "he said, she said" on steroids. For two months they said nothing to the GOP on the committee. It gave her time to get her social media cleaned up--although I did find one site where she gave a "clap" for an article about the Women's March.

Oh, I'm sure Dems did choreographed timing of it. Dirty, but you know what? a la guerre com a la guerre.
I wouldn't expect them to get a high road after all of the Mitch's dirty games - Garland, blocking most if the Obama's judutiary appointments, cancelled resses, I can go on and on.

It's one thing to put tactics into play. It's another thing to accuse a man 30 years later of almost raping and killing you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe Mark Judge ultimately did the right thing in this matter.

How so?

He knocked the rapist off the victim.

He also documented that kavanaugh was an alcoholic during HS.

Where are you getting this information about Judge saying it all happened? I'm reading he said it did NOT happen.

[Anonymous]

Well, I guess from now on, only women can be nominated to the SC. If allegations that went unreported for over thirty years that may or may not have taken place between two (possibly_ drunken teens--and we do not even have proof or corroboration that he was there--then no man is free from attack.

1. The whole story does not ring true.
2. We do not know for a fact that it is even Kavanaugh that she is talking about, but it is certainly convenient.
3. Even her story makes it sound like they were horsing around.

This whole thing is unreal. Sounds like she read too many of her psychology books. A teenager would have shared this with a friend contemporaneously. She was not raped, so she would not have been "shamed."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She feared for her life based on that? She actually thought they would kill her at a high school party with lots of people in attendance? She sounds a little nutty and hysterical.

She believes she endured a sexual assault. I feel for her. But I don’t believe her version of events is true.

Unlike her, I actually was raped by an acquaintance at a party. And I was scared shitless, but I never thought for a second that the guy was going to kill me. I do understand that their are situations in which one would justiably fear for their life (like if one were being raped at gun point). But in her set of facts, I don’t see how a rational person would fear for her life. She sounds a bit delusional.

Have you ever had a guy pin you down and cover your mouth with his hand? Human nature is to panic and fear that you might suffocate.

It's quite rational to fear getting a life threatening STD from forced sex.

HE DIDN'T HAVE SEX WITH HER THOUGH. My GOD you people are stupid or can't read.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Well, I guess from now on, only women can be nominated to the SC. If allegations that went unreported for over thirty years that may or may not have taken place between two (possibly_ drunken teens--and we do not even have proof or corroboration that he was there--then no man is free from attack.

1. The whole story does not ring true.
2. We do not know for a fact that it is even Kavanaugh that she is talking about, but it is certainly convenient.
3. Even her story makes it sound like they were horsing around.

This whole thing is unreal. Sounds like she read too many of her psychology books. A teenager would have shared this with a friend contemporaneously. She was not raped, so she would not have been "shamed."

Don't you know? Conservative women rape men and sexually molest kids all the time. Ask liberals

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:More reason to suspect the woman:

She signed the letter as Christine Blasey, the name she uses professionally.

Her LAWYER with a clear agenda says she took a polygraph. So put the results out to the public. All the below is, is words on a page. Put up or shut up:

She engaged Debra Katz, a Washington lawyer known for her work on sexual harassment cases. On the advice of Katz, who believed Ford would be attacked as a liar if she came forward, Ford took a polygraph test administered by a former FBI agent in early August. The results, which Katz provided to The Post, concluded that Ford was being truthful when she said a statement summarizing her allegations was accurate.

?????? A woman using her husband’s name socially and her maiden name professionally is suspect somehow???? Do you KNOW any professional women in the DMV?????

Also, if the WaPo vetted it, it’s good. This will be turned over to all sorts of people to scrutinize. They wouldn’t risk their reputation by signing off on a sketchy poly.

That’s two strikes...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The GOP probably knew about this over the summer when the whole "sen feinstein hired a chinese spy" think broke.

BS. The Dems planned this. They sat on the letter until the 11th hour. Their timing is choreographed, just like their playacting the morning of the first hearing. This is "he said, she said" on steroids. For two months they said nothing to the GOP on the committee. It gave her time to get her social media cleaned up--although I did find one site where she gave a "clap" for an article about the Women's March.

Oh, I'm sure Dems did choreographed timing of it. Dirty, but you know what? a la guerre com a la guerre.
I wouldn't expect them to get a high road after all of the Mitch's dirty games - Garland, blocking most if the Obama's judutiary appointments, cancelled resses, I can go on and on.

It's one thing to put tactics into play. It's another thing to accuse a man 30 years later of almost raping and killing you.

The liberals here have turned this into 'almost rape' and 'almost murder'. And they say conservatives are fearful? LOL

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She feared for her life based on that? She actually thought they would kill her at a high school party with lots of people in attendance? She sounds a little nutty and hysterical.

She believes she endured a sexual assault. I feel for her. But I don’t believe her version of events is true.

Unlike her, I actually was raped by an acquaintance at a party. And I was scared shitless, but I never thought for a second that the guy was going to kill me. I do understand that their are situations in which one would justiably fear for their life (like if one were being raped at gun point). But in her set of facts, I don’t see how a rational person would fear for her life. She sounds a bit delusional.

Have you ever had a guy pin you down and cover your mouth with his hand? Human nature is to panic and fear that you might suffocate.

It's quite rational to fear getting a life threatening STD from forced sex.

HE DIDN'T HAVE SEX WITH HER THOUGH. My GOD you people are stupid or can't read.

They're creating a storyline. Tossing around accusations that will swirl around Kavanaugh and his family for life. They don't care because they're that desperate to keep him off the Supreme Court.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Man. She is very credible.

Have you ever known or been a high school girl? Here's a little secret: a story like this would have been shared contemporaneously. NOT saved for years. Had she been raped, she might not have shared, but this is the kind of story a girl would share. Hiding in the bathroom, etc.

She doesn't remember what year it was?
She doesn't remember how she left the house?

If it had happened and was that traumatic, she would have remembered.

She passed an FBI polygraph. Think Kavanaugh will be willing to take one?

It was administered by a former FBI agent according to the Washington Post article.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Well, I guess from now on, only women can be nominated to the SC. If allegations that went unreported for over thirty years that may or may not have taken place between two (possibly_ drunken teens--and we do not even have proof or corroboration that he was there--then no man is free from attack.

1. The whole story does not ring true.
2. We do not know for a fact that it is even Kavanaugh that she is talking about, but it is certainly convenient.
3. Even her story makes it sound like they were horsing around.

This whole thing is unreal. Sounds like she read too many of her psychology books. A teenager would have shared this with a friend contemporaneously. She was not raped, so she would not have been "shamed."

She's a research psychologist. So yup, she's read a lot of books. She would also know exactly how to frame something like this and have psychologist friends to back her up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Man. She is very credible.

Have you ever known or been a high school girl? Here's a little secret: a story like this would have been shared contemporaneously. NOT saved for years. Had she been raped, she might not have shared, but this is the kind of story a girl would share. Hiding in the bathroom, etc.

She doesn't remember what year it was?
She doesn't remember how she left the house?

If it had happened and was that traumatic, she would have remembered.

She passed an FBI polygraph. Think Kavanaugh will be willing to take one?

It was administered by a former FBI agent according to the Washington Post article.

And so her feminist lawyer says.