Michael Cohen and related issues Master Thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Daniel's family was on Chris Plante. Apparently she has quite the imagination and history

Who is Chris Plante?

WMAL host/Fox shill.

Respected journalist who figured out that he could live a more lavish lifestyle by feeding red meat to deplorables.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Daniel's family was on Chris Plante. Apparently she has quite the imagination and history

Who is Chris Plante?

WMAL host/Fox shill.

Respected journalist who figured out that he could live a more lavish lifestyle by feeding red meat to deplorables.

So a Fox shill.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would like to claim the reward.

So hilarious to threaten women with their newborns! Family values, amirite!

I think it is hilarious to make such a claim with absolutely no proof. Had that happened to me, I damn well would have contacted the police.
Color me skeptical.

Keep doubting Trump's scandals, all the way to the bitter end.

The fact is that lots of people don't report threats like this, because they can't actually protect you from an unknown person. You don't get a security detail because someone threatened you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I would like to claim the reward.

My vote is Willem Dafoe circa 1980-something

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would like to claim the reward.

So hilarious to threaten women with their newborns! Family values, amirite!

I think it is hilarious to make such a claim with absolutely no proof. Had that happened to me, I damn well would have contacted the police.
Color me skeptical.

Keep doubting Trump's scandals, all the way to the bitter end.

The fact is that lots of people don't report threats like this, because they can't actually protect you from an unknown person. You don't get a security detail because someone threatened you.

Um... she hired her security detail. It had nothing to do with this “alleged threat” she is claiming. I have no doubt it is part of her desire for that “15 minutes of fame.”
My prediction.......they will never identify this person because he does not exist.

[Anonymous]

When is wood expected to rule?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I would like to claim the reward.

Hmmm

https://twitter.com/PooleLoe/status/986330682250031105

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lemme guess. The minor matters Hannity was probably just consulting Cohen about must have been just “adoptions.”

+1 something is not adding up here. SDNY or Mueller will provide greater clarity.

Hannity said "mostly real estate". Maybe he wanted to know how to set up some woman in a f*ck pad.

Assuming he’s being truthful about “real estate” this was my first thought. A Manhattan apt or Florida condo for current side girlfriend or for an ex side girlfriend to keep quiet.

Or a cash purchase at a Trump property with laundered Russian money?

Hannity is filthy rich, and liquid. And he’s heir apparent to take over for Limbaugh, who makes $100m cash a year. Why the hell would Hannity care about laundering peanuts thru a real estate deal. Cohen’s speciality was fixing issues with side women.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:FOX NEWS statement on Hannity: "While FOX News was unaware of Sean Hannity's informal relationship with Michael Cohen and was surprised by the announcement in court yesterday, we have reviewed the matter and spoken to Sean and he continues to have our full support."

uh huh

so this is actual media bias

remember it

I am having the dissonant experience of jaw dropping surprise and also the met expectation that Fox is trash.

Yes, this is actual media bias.

+1 This is such an egregious case of conflict of interest Fox is losing all credibility by not at least suspending him.

Not even Fox News knew that conservative commentator Sean Hannity was a client of President Donald Trump's personal attorney Michael Cohen until it was revealed in court Monday — and media ethics experts across the political spectrum are calling foul.

Hannity is the host of a primetime opinion show on Fox News, as well as a conservative talk radio show. He regularly discusses the president's legal affairs and has often defended Cohen amid his mounting legal conflicts, particularly in the wake of an April 9 raid on the lawyer's office and residence.

Hannity, an outspoken Trump supporter who has a warm relationship with the president, never disclosed on air that he received legal services from Cohen.

Samuel Freedman, a professor at Columbia University's Graduate School of Journalism specializing in media ethics, said Hannity's omission was "clearly an ethical violation."

"It's so blatant, it's not even a hard call," Freedman said, adding that he thinks Fox should cut ties with Hannity over the potential conflict of interest.

"I don't think they'll do it, but I think they should fire him," Freedman said. "This is a major breach."

It appeared to be a moot point Tuesday, however. Fox News said it still backed Hannity despite learning about his dealings with Cohen on Monday.

"While Fox News was unaware of Sean Hannity's informal relationship with Michael Cohen and was surprised by the announcement in court yesterday, we have reviewed the matter and spoken to Sean and he continues to have our full support," the cable channel said in a statement.

[Anonymous]

It's likely not laundering, its likely part of the collusion link.

[Anonymous]

It looks remarkably like Stormy’s husband.
This man, "Glendon Crain," has a history. And, the charges against him were dropped just before her 60 Minutes interview.

In July 2015, Crain was accused of family violence and “intentionally, knowingly or recklessly causing bodily injury,” after he allegedly pushed Daniels to the floor. That’s according to a March 2018 Daily Mail report. Two days after his arrest, Crain was released from custody. On March 15, 2018, the charges against Crain were dropped after he completed a rehab program. Shortly afterwards, Daniels made world news with her 60 Minutes interview. The Daily Mail report adds that the full documents relating to Crain’s arrest were being withheld because the it is possible that the case could be reopened.

https://heavy.com/news/2018/01/stormy-daniels-husband-glendon-crain/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would like to claim the reward.

Hmmm

https://twitter.com/PooleLoe/status/986330682250031105

And Matthew Jr's dad is the COO of Trump, Inc. - it would make sense if it was him but I think he's too young. Stormy said the guy was 30's/40.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would like to claim the reward.

So hilarious to threaten women with their newborns! Family values, amirite!

I think it is hilarious to make such a claim with absolutely no proof. Had that happened to me, I damn well would have contacted the police.
Color me skeptical.

Keep doubting Trump's scandals, all the way to the bitter end.

The fact is that lots of people don't report threats like this, because they can't actually protect you from an unknown person. You don't get a security detail because someone threatened you.

Um... she hired her security detail. It had nothing to do with this “alleged threat” she is claiming. I have no doubt it is part of her desire for that “15 minutes of fame.”
My prediction.......they will never identify this person because he does not exist.

Ummm ... she’s been famous for quite some time. Check your husband’s browsing history.