Big Beautiful Bill

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Breaking from the NYT:

Trump’s Policy Bill Could Add $2.4 Trillion to Debt, CBO Analysis Shows

The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said Wednesday that the broad Republican bill to cut taxes and slash some federal programs would add $2.4 trillion to the already soaring national debt over the next decade, in an analysis that was all but certain to inflame concerns that President Trump’s domestic agenda would lead to excessive government borrowing.

The Senate will (probably) abide by the Byrd rule. More importantly, isn't reconciliation supposed to be revenue neutral? Doesn't this kill a lot of the Big Beautiful Bill?

Yes. The senate will have to remove the portions of the bill that are not revenue neutral and send it back to the house. The House will have to vote all over again for what is left after the Senate chip it to pieces. There are at least four senators, McConnell, Johnson, Murkowski, and Paul, who have issues with the bill as it stands

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So will the Senate ax the most troubling parts about AI and the courts? Or they will just rubber stamp after pretending to care like the House did?

Legally they are supposed to under the Byrd Rule.

[Anonymous]

16 million people kicked off of health insurance.

#winning

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:16 million people kicked off of health insurance.

#winning

Mike Johnson: They won't lose Medicaid access "unless they choose to do so."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Multiple House Republicans who voted for the bill - WHICH WOULD NOT HAVE PASSED WITHOUT THEIR VOTES - saying it’s terrible.

Eff this shirking loser. The Senate needs to fix it?

He voted for it!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Multiple House Republicans who voted for the bill - WHICH WOULD NOT HAVE PASSED WITHOUT THEIR VOTES - saying it’s terrible.

MAGA: please help. Why did GOP representatives vote for a bill they don’t support?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Multiple House Republicans who voted for the bill - WHICH WOULD NOT HAVE PASSED WITHOUT THEIR VOTES - saying it’s terrible.

MAGA: please help. Why did GOP representatives vote for a bill they don’t support?

Biden's clone mind-controlled them using Hunter's laptop.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Multiple House Republicans who voted for the bill - WHICH WOULD NOT HAVE PASSED WITHOUT THEIR VOTES - saying it’s terrible.

MAGA: please help. Why did GOP representatives vote for a bill they don’t support?

Because trump told them too. They vote yes next tine too. They stand for nothing

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Multiple House Republicans who voted for the bill - WHICH WOULD NOT HAVE PASSED WITHOUT THEIR VOTES - saying it’s terrible.

MAGA: please help. Why did GOP representatives vote for a bill they don’t support?

Because they are scared of YamTits and all laid down figuring the Senate would fix it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Multiple House Republicans who voted for the bill - WHICH WOULD NOT HAVE PASSED WITHOUT THEIR VOTES - saying it’s terrible.

MAGA: please help. Why did GOP representatives vote for a bill they don’t support?

Biden's clone mind-controlled them using Hunter's laptop.

ah the REAL use for the space lasers!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Multiple House Republicans who voted for the bill - WHICH WOULD NOT HAVE PASSED WITHOUT THEIR VOTES - saying it’s terrible.

MAGA: please help. Why did GOP representatives vote for a bill they don’t support?

At least some of the GOP representatives voted for the bill on the assurance that the Senate would not pass it. Apparently, MTG didn't even get that assurance (or didn't ask for it).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Breaking from the NYT:

Trump’s Policy Bill Could Add $2.4 Trillion to Debt, CBO Analysis Shows

The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said Wednesday that the broad Republican bill to cut taxes and slash some federal programs would add $2.4 trillion to the already soaring national debt over the next decade, in an analysis that was all but certain to inflame concerns that President Trump’s domestic agenda would lead to excessive government borrowing.

The Senate will (probably) abide by the Byrd rule. More importantly, isn't reconciliation supposed to be revenue neutral? Doesn't this kill a lot of the Big Beautiful Bill?

Yes. The senate will have to remove the portions of the bill that are not revenue neutral and send it back to the house. The House will have to vote all over again for what is left after the Senate chip it to pieces. There are at least four senators, McConnell, Johnson, Murkowski, and Paul, who have issues with the bill as it stands

No, the Senate will overrule the parliamentarian and score it with the tax cuts as revenue neutral. In other words, they will keep the existing tax rates, rather than raise them.
Biden's budgets did not repeal Trump's tax cuts, but no one said he was raising the deficit because of it.

[Anonymous]

Oh no what will Alabama do without that sweet federal sugar from actually productive taxpayers in New York, New Jersey and Connecticut?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Oh no what will Alabama do without that sweet federal sugar from actually productive taxpayers in New York, New Jersey and Connecticut?

Tuberville is a moron - but he's right about this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Multiple House Republicans who voted for the bill - WHICH WOULD NOT HAVE PASSED WITHOUT THEIR VOTES - saying it’s terrible.

MAGA: please help. Why did GOP representatives vote for a bill they don’t support?

Biden's clone mind-controlled them using Hunter's laptop.

It was the autopen!