Disagree. While technically the proposal focuses on Wisc Avenue, the proposal would change the character of the nearby n-hoods. And that is consistent with the overall push to cram people into NWDC. Wisc Avenue does need to be redeveloped but it does not need to include 10 story buildings and dozens of condo or apartment buildings. Radical changes to the area will drive out the people who live there, and who pay the bulk of DC income taxes. |
What’s this 1/2 miles of bus stop? Can someone cite. Sounds diabolical |
"Cram people into NWDC" ![]() Brought to you by NWDC Residents Against More NWDC Residents. |
Sorry. Agree 100% with previous post. DC should avoid changing radically the character of NWDC. Those residents pay the bills in DC and are entirely why DC has done economically well until recently. Moreover, there are plenty of places in DC where larger condo or apartment buildings can be built. There simply is no need to push the balance to a tipping point. |
Maybe, everyone in DC should move to NWDC and, thus, everyone would benefit from whatever NWDC has. Better idea is to devote resources to the underfunded areas of DC improving them and making them more like NWDC. |
How many SFHs are located ON Wisconsin Avenue…there were maybe 3-5 on a stretch down near the Cathedral Heights development…and literally that is it on the entire stretch from Western to M street. Again, there are no SFHs on Wisconsin. The development either makes economic sense and will happen, or it doesn’t and it won’t. |
The Wisconsin area plan is corridor based. It also contemplates development off Wisconsin. The FH site is huge and goes blocks back off Wisconsin. |
Alternatively, increasing housing in NWDC and also improve other areas of DC! Win-win! |
How would building more higher-rise condos on Wisconsin change the character of parts of the neighborhood that are, say, eight blocks from Wisconsin, exactly? I live less than a block from Wisconsin, so I could sort of see it if you're trying to tell me it's going to change the character of my block. But why should you oppose this if you live at, like, 47th and Brandywine? |
All this density and no plan for schools or other resources. Ward 3 schools are already packed. And hurting. The irony is that many folks want to live in upper NW for better schools and safer streets. More students with no resources increased - school performance metrics go down. And everyone suffers. What would be lovely is bulldozing all the ugly buildings and create green space with SFH behind them. |
I guess we've moved past All the cars in the city should be on the big streets where only apartment people live! straight onto There shouldn't be any housing on the big streets at all, just green space for people to look at as they drive by! |
What's eye rolly to you about this? It's unclear to me why you find this shocking. |
"NWDC for All!" |
How would adding housing on commercial corridors radically change the character of NWDC? No one is talking about putting massive apartment buildings in the side streets. |
where would they go ON wisconsin ave. Please show on a map, thanks |