Hogan running for Senate

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A vote for Hogan means

NATIONAL ABORTION BAN
NATIONAL CONTRACEPTIVE BAN
NATIONAL WOMEN'S INTERSTATE TRAVEL BAN
NATIONAL RELIGION IN SCHOOLS
AND MOST OF ALL NATIONAL INSTALLMENT OF PROJECT 2025.

Why did I do all caps, because clearly people are still idiots and can not understand how bad voting for Hogan will be for the state of MD and the country.

If you are an American you will never vote for one Republican again.

Between Project 2025, and the fact they don't want Americans voting which is the core reason we are the United States of America no American would vote for a Republican ever again.

There are no two sides here either you love America ie vote Democrat or you love Russia vote Republican. Full stop no discussion, why because the god dammed treasonous snakes wrote it all down.

Who is proposing banning contraception?

Read this thread and the links in it. https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1178761.page

Voting against a strawman bill to nationalize contraception laws is the same as a nationwide ban now?

You're using the word "strawman" wrong. It was an actual bill to codify an existing federal right to contraception. The Republicans voted against it.

No, you’re just dumb. The bill was a strawman. It’s trying to suggest there’s a problem (“right wingers” proposing to ban birth control) that doesn’t exist.

Thomas explicitly listed Griswold as one of the cases he'd like to overturn next in his Dobbs concurrence. When someone tells you what they're planning, listen.

+1

Anyone thinking that once Republcians take over things will be like normal ie playing by three branches of government, is not listening.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:His own ads are all.about the border and other right wing dogwhistles. He's clearly saying who he is and the whole "but so moderate" is a lie. He was leashed by the dem legislature, he won't be as a senator.

To be clear the border is a mess and needs to be addressed. The Dems have abjectly failed in that regard.

Try again.

Votes are public. Your boys have voted no for all Boarder anything.

This is easy moron learn to use the internet properly. PUBLIC RECORD every single vote by both parties.

Republicans voted NO.

So spare us your misinformation or utter garbage.

And that wall your boy said he would build every contractor they hired jailed and or indicted. Ask the families in the boarder town who the problem is with. It is not Dems fact.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A vote for Hogan means

NATIONAL ABORTION BAN
NATIONAL CONTRACEPTIVE BAN
NATIONAL WOMEN'S INTERSTATE TRAVEL BAN
NATIONAL RELIGION IN SCHOOLS
AND MOST OF ALL NATIONAL INSTALLMENT OF PROJECT 2025.

Why did I do all caps, because clearly people are still idiots and can not understand how bad voting for Hogan will be for the state of MD and the country.

If you are an American you will never vote for one Republican again.

Between Project 2025, and the fact they don't want Americans voting which is the core reason we are the United States of America no American would vote for a Republican ever again.

There are no two sides here either you love America ie vote Democrat or you love Russia vote Republican. Full stop no discussion, why because the god dammed treasonous snakes wrote it all down.

Who is proposing banning contraception?

Read this thread and the links in it. https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1178761.page

Voting against a strawman bill to nationalize contraception laws is the same as a nationwide ban now?

You're using the word "strawman" wrong. It was an actual bill to codify an existing federal right to contraception. The Republicans voted against it.

No, you’re just dumb. The bill was a strawman. It’s trying to suggest there’s a problem (“right wingers” proposing to ban birth control) that doesn’t exist.

Thomas explicitly listed Griswold as one of the cases he'd like to overturn next in his Dobbs concurrence. When someone tells you what they're planning, listen.

+1

Anyone thinking that once Republcians take over things will be like normal ie playing by three branches of government, is not listening.

I mean the Supreme Court is literally about to rule that hospitals can be prohibited from performing abortion care even in the case of emergencies. The state of Idaho is literally suing to force hospitals to sit in their hands while women die.

Don't tell me "Republicans wouldn't" because look what they've already done.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The histrionics about a possible Hogan win are hilarious. He did a good job for MD as governor and will do a good job as senator.

Governors can be non-partisan. Senators have to decide which party to caucus with. That decision alone disqualifies him for me

+1

The Hogan supporters on this thread are trying to bamboozle us with vague assurances of Hogan’s alleged “moderation”. But I notice that they carefully avoid acknowledging that senators make binary, up-or-down votes and so far none of them have promised that Hogan would provide Democrats with a crucial vote to block a Trump Supreme Court nominee or a piece of legislation important to MAGA.

How could they? He won't.

I don’t know how many times we have to explain this, but we know he’s a Republican, so we aren’t voting for him with the expectation that he’s caucusing with Democrats. I don’t however expect him to toe the MAGA line with crazy legislation. There is room for that in the Senate, not so much in the House. Hogan is not dumb, unless he really is aiming to be a 1 term Senator he cannot go full MAGA because his core constituency is non-MAGA moderates on both sides.

With Project 2025, he doesn't care. 6 years is enough time to do massive amounts of damage.

I’m sorry but nothing I have seen of Larry Hogan tells me he is cobbling together a coalition of moderates only to abandon that and go full MAGA once in the Senate, thus ensuring his fate as a 1 term wonder. I’m just not seeing it.

True!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:His own ads are all.about the border and other right wing dogwhistles. He's clearly saying who he is and the whole "but so moderate" is a lie. He was leashed by the dem legislature, he won't be as a senator.

To be clear the border is a mess and needs to be addressed. The Dems have abjectly failed in that regard.

Try again.

Votes are public. Your boys have voted no for all Boarder anything.

This is easy moron learn to use the internet properly. PUBLIC RECORD every single vote by both parties.

Republicans voted NO.

So spare us your misinformation or utter garbage.

And that wall your boy said he would build every contractor they hired jailed and or indicted. Ask the families in the boarder town who the problem is with. It is not Dems fact.

The wall obsession ignores that 2/3 of cases are visa overstays anyway. But the big dumb boogeyman and simple (but functionally useless) ideas like walls are easy slogans.

[Anonymous]

This thread illustrates the political dysfunction that exists in this country. One one hand you have people giving calm, reasoned responses and on the other people have resorted to name calling, all caps yelling, and hyperbole. There used to be a day where people could actually rationally discuss differences in opinion and it’s sad that day has long since passed. Now if you don’t share someone’s viewpoint you’re a moron, idiot, un-American 🙄

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This thread illustrates the political dysfunction that exists in this country. One one hand you have people giving calm, reasoned responses and on the other people have resorted to name calling, all caps yelling, and hyperbole. There used to be a day where people could actually rationally discuss differences in opinion and it’s sad that day has long since passed. Now if you don’t share someone’s viewpoint you’re a moron, idiot, un-American 🙄

Either you posted on the wrong thread, or you're a bot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This thread illustrates the political dysfunction that exists in this country. One one hand you have people giving calm, reasoned responses and on the other people have resorted to name calling, all caps yelling, and hyperbole. There used to be a day where people could actually rationally discuss differences in opinion and it’s sad that day has long since passed. Now if you don’t share someone’s viewpoint you’re a moron, idiot, un-American 🙄

Either you posted on the wrong thread, or you're a bot.

The poster is mad that they can't rebut facts, so they're accusing people of name calling. Because apparently citing Supreme Court cases is uncivil.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A vote for Hogan means

NATIONAL ABORTION BAN
NATIONAL CONTRACEPTIVE BAN
NATIONAL WOMEN'S INTERSTATE TRAVEL BAN
NATIONAL RELIGION IN SCHOOLS
AND MOST OF ALL NATIONAL INSTALLMENT OF PROJECT 2025.

Why did I do all caps, because clearly people are still idiots and can not understand how bad voting for Hogan will be for the state of MD and the country.

If you are an American you will never vote for one Republican again.

Between Project 2025, and the fact they don't want Americans voting which is the core reason we are the United States of America no American would vote for a Republican ever again.

There are no two sides here either you love America ie vote Democrat or you love Russia vote Republican. Full stop no discussion, why because the god dammed treasonous snakes wrote it all down.

Who is proposing banning contraception?

Read this thread and the links in it. https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1178761.page

Voting against a strawman bill to nationalize contraception laws is the same as a nationwide ban now?

You're using the word "strawman" wrong. It was an actual bill to codify an existing federal right to contraception. The Republicans voted against it.

No, you’re just dumb. The bill was a strawman. It’s trying to suggest there’s a problem (“right wingers” proposing to ban birth control) that doesn’t exist.

Thomas explicitly listed Griswold as one of the cases he'd like to overturn next in his Dobbs concurrence. When someone tells you what they're planning, listen.

Still waiting to see how that results in a national ban.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A vote for Hogan means

NATIONAL ABORTION BAN
NATIONAL CONTRACEPTIVE BAN
NATIONAL WOMEN'S INTERSTATE TRAVEL BAN
NATIONAL RELIGION IN SCHOOLS
AND MOST OF ALL NATIONAL INSTALLMENT OF PROJECT 2025.

Why did I do all caps, because clearly people are still idiots and can not understand how bad voting for Hogan will be for the state of MD and the country.

If you are an American you will never vote for one Republican again.

Between Project 2025, and the fact they don't want Americans voting which is the core reason we are the United States of America no American would vote for a Republican ever again.

There are no two sides here either you love America ie vote Democrat or you love Russia vote Republican. Full stop no discussion, why because the god dammed treasonous snakes wrote it all down.

Who is proposing banning contraception?

Read this thread and the links in it. https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1178761.page

Voting against a strawman bill to nationalize contraception laws is the same as a nationwide ban now?

You're using the word "strawman" wrong. It was an actual bill to codify an existing federal right to contraception. The Republicans voted against it.

No, you’re just dumb. The bill was a strawman. It’s trying to suggest there’s a problem (“right wingers” proposing to ban birth control) that doesn’t exist.

Thomas explicitly listed Griswold as one of the cases he'd like to overturn next in his Dobbs concurrence. When someone tells you what they're planning, listen.

Still waiting to see how that results in a national ban.

DP. When people with power make public statements that they are trying to restrict or eliminate people's access to contraception, I take them at their word. It might be a debating point to you, but it's real life to me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A vote for Hogan means

NATIONAL ABORTION BAN
NATIONAL CONTRACEPTIVE BAN
NATIONAL WOMEN'S INTERSTATE TRAVEL BAN
NATIONAL RELIGION IN SCHOOLS
AND MOST OF ALL NATIONAL INSTALLMENT OF PROJECT 2025.

Why did I do all caps, because clearly people are still idiots and can not understand how bad voting for Hogan will be for the state of MD and the country.

If you are an American you will never vote for one Republican again.

Between Project 2025, and the fact they don't want Americans voting which is the core reason we are the United States of America no American would vote for a Republican ever again.

There are no two sides here either you love America ie vote Democrat or you love Russia vote Republican. Full stop no discussion, why because the god dammed treasonous snakes wrote it all down.

Who is proposing banning contraception?

Read this thread and the links in it. https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1178761.page

Voting against a strawman bill to nationalize contraception laws is the same as a nationwide ban now?

You're using the word "strawman" wrong. It was an actual bill to codify an existing federal right to contraception. The Republicans voted against it.

No, you’re just dumb. The bill was a strawman. It’s trying to suggest there’s a problem (“right wingers” proposing to ban birth control) that doesn’t exist.

Thomas explicitly listed Griswold as one of the cases he'd like to overturn next in his Dobbs concurrence. When someone tells you what they're planning, listen.

Still waiting to see how that results in a national ban.

DP. When people with power make public statements that they are trying to restrict or eliminate people's access to contraception, I take them at their word. It might be a debating point to you, but it's real life to me.

I'm sorry - you told me that someone has proposed a national ban. I'm still looking for where that is proposed. Because thinking Griswold, which was about a state contraception ban, was speciously reasoned is not the same thing as ushering in a national ban.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A vote for Hogan means

NATIONAL ABORTION BAN
NATIONAL CONTRACEPTIVE BAN
NATIONAL WOMEN'S INTERSTATE TRAVEL BAN
NATIONAL RELIGION IN SCHOOLS
AND MOST OF ALL NATIONAL INSTALLMENT OF PROJECT 2025.

Why did I do all caps, because clearly people are still idiots and can not understand how bad voting for Hogan will be for the state of MD and the country.

If you are an American you will never vote for one Republican again.

Between Project 2025, and the fact they don't want Americans voting which is the core reason we are the United States of America no American would vote for a Republican ever again.

There are no two sides here either you love America ie vote Democrat or you love Russia vote Republican. Full stop no discussion, why because the god dammed treasonous snakes wrote it all down.

Who is proposing banning contraception?

Read this thread and the links in it. https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1178761.page

Voting against a strawman bill to nationalize contraception laws is the same as a nationwide ban now?

You're using the word "strawman" wrong. It was an actual bill to codify an existing federal right to contraception. The Republicans voted against it.

No, you’re just dumb. The bill was a strawman. It’s trying to suggest there’s a problem (“right wingers” proposing to ban birth control) that doesn’t exist.

Thomas explicitly listed Griswold as one of the cases he'd like to overturn next in his Dobbs concurrence. When someone tells you what they're planning, listen.

Still waiting to see how that results in a national ban.

DP. When people with power make public statements that they are trying to restrict or eliminate people's access to contraception, I take them at their word. It might be a debating point to you, but it's real life to me.

I'm sorry - you told me that someone has proposed a national ban. I'm still looking for where that is proposed. Because thinking Griswold, which was about a state contraception ban, was speciously reasoned is not the same thing as ushering in a national ban.

Yeah, it's a debating point to you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A vote for Hogan means

NATIONAL ABORTION BAN
NATIONAL CONTRACEPTIVE BAN
NATIONAL WOMEN'S INTERSTATE TRAVEL BAN
NATIONAL RELIGION IN SCHOOLS
AND MOST OF ALL NATIONAL INSTALLMENT OF PROJECT 2025.

Why did I do all caps, because clearly people are still idiots and can not understand how bad voting for Hogan will be for the state of MD and the country.

If you are an American you will never vote for one Republican again.

Between Project 2025, and the fact they don't want Americans voting which is the core reason we are the United States of America no American would vote for a Republican ever again.

There are no two sides here either you love America ie vote Democrat or you love Russia vote Republican. Full stop no discussion, why because the god dammed treasonous snakes wrote it all down.

Who is proposing banning contraception?

Read this thread and the links in it. https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1178761.page

Voting against a strawman bill to nationalize contraception laws is the same as a nationwide ban now?

You're using the word "strawman" wrong. It was an actual bill to codify an existing federal right to contraception. The Republicans voted against it.

No, you’re just dumb. The bill was a strawman. It’s trying to suggest there’s a problem (“right wingers” proposing to ban birth control) that doesn’t exist.

You didn’t read the whole thread and all the links in it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A vote for Hogan means

NATIONAL ABORTION BAN
NATIONAL CONTRACEPTIVE BAN
NATIONAL WOMEN'S INTERSTATE TRAVEL BAN
NATIONAL RELIGION IN SCHOOLS
AND MOST OF ALL NATIONAL INSTALLMENT OF PROJECT 2025.

Why did I do all caps, because clearly people are still idiots and can not understand how bad voting for Hogan will be for the state of MD and the country.

If you are an American you will never vote for one Republican again.

Between Project 2025, and the fact they don't want Americans voting which is the core reason we are the United States of America no American would vote for a Republican ever again.

There are no two sides here either you love America ie vote Democrat or you love Russia vote Republican. Full stop no discussion, why because the god dammed treasonous snakes wrote it all down.

Who is proposing banning contraception?

Read this thread and the links in it. https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1178761.page

Voting against a strawman bill to nationalize contraception laws is the same as a nationwide ban now?

You're using the word "strawman" wrong. It was an actual bill to codify an existing federal right to contraception. The Republicans voted against it.

No, you’re just dumb. The bill was a strawman. It’s trying to suggest there’s a problem (“right wingers” proposing to ban birth control) that doesn’t exist.

Thomas explicitly listed Griswold as one of the cases he'd like to overturn next in his Dobbs concurrence. When someone tells you what they're planning, listen.

Still waiting to see how that results in a national ban.

DP. When people with power make public statements that they are trying to restrict or eliminate people's access to contraception, I take them at their word. It might be a debating point to you, but it's real life to me.

I'm sorry - you told me that someone has proposed a national ban. I'm still looking for where that is proposed. Because thinking Griswold, which was about a state contraception ban, was speciously reasoned is not the same thing as ushering in a national ban.

Many, many Republicans consider the most reliable forms of birth control to be abortifacients. Stop arguing here about it and just read that whole thread. There’s lots and lots of evidence there.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A vote for Hogan means

NATIONAL ABORTION BAN
NATIONAL CONTRACEPTIVE BAN
NATIONAL WOMEN'S INTERSTATE TRAVEL BAN
NATIONAL RELIGION IN SCHOOLS
AND MOST OF ALL NATIONAL INSTALLMENT OF PROJECT 2025.

Why did I do all caps, because clearly people are still idiots and can not understand how bad voting for Hogan will be for the state of MD and the country.

If you are an American you will never vote for one Republican again.

Between Project 2025, and the fact they don't want Americans voting which is the core reason we are the United States of America no American would vote for a Republican ever again.

There are no two sides here either you love America ie vote Democrat or you love Russia vote Republican. Full stop no discussion, why because the god dammed treasonous snakes wrote it all down.

Who is proposing banning contraception?

Read this thread and the links in it. https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1178761.page

Voting against a strawman bill to nationalize contraception laws is the same as a nationwide ban now?

You're using the word "strawman" wrong. It was an actual bill to codify an existing federal right to contraception. The Republicans voted against it.

No, you’re just dumb. The bill was a strawman. It’s trying to suggest there’s a problem (“right wingers” proposing to ban birth control) that doesn’t exist.

Thomas explicitly listed Griswold as one of the cases he'd like to overturn next in his Dobbs concurrence. When someone tells you what they're planning, listen.

Still waiting to see how that results in a national ban.

DP. When people with power make public statements that they are trying to restrict or eliminate people's access to contraception, I take them at their word. It might be a debating point to you, but it's real life to me.

I'm sorry - you told me that someone has proposed a national ban. I'm still looking for where that is proposed. Because thinking Griswold, which was about a state contraception ban, was speciously reasoned is not the same thing as ushering in a national ban.

Many, many Republicans consider the most reliable forms of birth control to be abortifacients. Stop arguing here about it and just read that whole thread. There’s lots and lots of evidence there.

I admire you for not letting facts and reality stand in the way of your convictions.